War And Finances: In any war once started the victory is governed by many factors one of them being financial pumping. Humanitarian Aid is a part of it and that's one of the reasons why we are "Human Beings" and not Animals. It's not personal opinion but a global one I believe. In case you would like to agree then take a case where nothing is put in Humanitarian Aid then more and more of people like "Jordanian Expert" who was interviewed on BBC from Jordan who would be uttering statements like quote unquote "Nazism Of Bush And Blair" That was aired by BBC (as i saw few hours back) and not me. In addition, the possibility switch over of local mass (which is not coming as expected by the administrations) would have been impossible and more of Mosul type of challenges.
While on Anger: Camp David Summit. PM is interested in getting UN involvement soon. A reason could be Anger or frustration in which UN and Security council impase lead to this war would normally prevent Bush from Agreeing to it.
Saddam is bad. But the lethal WMD was not handed over to Lebanon extremists when there was contact with them. And you may not like but during 1980's these WMD were shipped by US to Saddam (when he was enjoying the Blue Eyed Boy status) to fight Iran.
If he hands over nukes to OBL (which is a laughable proposition) then Saddam would be the first to be bombed by OBL.
The Indonesians are not taking the war nicely...The moderate Muslim Leader there again on air on BBC has said statements which again may not be welcomed but it was something more worse than the Jordinanian Expert,.. again aired on BBC.
When it hits the target it is "Precision Bombing" and when it doesn't it was Iraqi Mis-hit. At least that's how the Baghdad market place is being expressed by Western Media. There are mishits in every war but it would be brave to accept the same. Actually the worry is that this mishit is raising sentiments against the attacks from within Iraqi's (who may be dubbed as "Republican Army" in civilian clothes.
I am sure it is not
Actually for all those against war (in general and not particularly this one) would always be thought of seeing it with bias by "Advocates Of War" ...that's how a debate starts isn't it?
While on Anger: Camp David Summit. PM is interested in getting UN involvement soon. A reason could be Anger or frustration in which UN and Security council impase lead to this war would normally prevent Bush from Agreeing to it.
Saddam is bad. But the lethal WMD was not handed over to Lebanon extremists when there was contact with them. And you may not like but during 1980's these WMD were shipped by US to Saddam (when he was enjoying the Blue Eyed Boy status) to fight Iran.
If he hands over nukes to OBL (which is a laughable proposition) then Saddam would be the first to be bombed by OBL.
The Indonesians are not taking the war nicely...The moderate Muslim Leader there again on air on BBC has said statements which again may not be welcomed but it was something more worse than the Jordinanian Expert,.. again aired on BBC.
Quote:
it seems quite contradictory that they would spend so much money and time into precision bombing and humanitarian aid.Quote:
I'm afraid your argument is severely flawed.I am sure it is not
Quote:
I'm sure we could debate the motives and consequences all day, but until you can see things objectivelyActually for all those against war (in general and not particularly this one) would always be thought of seeing it with bias by "Advocates Of War" ...that's how a debate starts isn't it?