Actually, the problem with Links SQL 2.0 is the confusion with Links 2.0.
Since links 2.0 is probably never, ever going to go past a version 3.0, maybe calling Links SQL NG the 5.0 version (sort of like what M$ did with Word for Windows, to bring it into sync with DOS Word, except for the reverse reason, to keep it out of sync <G>).
Maybe calling it something completely different, would work, but then you move away from the "links" name.
Maybe calling it Gossamer Links 3.0, rather than Links SQL ?? (I don't think 2.0 is a good name, for a lot of reasons, not the least of which is the confusion with links 2.0, but also we've really skipped the 2.0 release and maybe even a 3.0 release, waiting for this one).
Sounds ethereal, and then merges it into Gossamer Mail, Gossamer Links, <G>.
I think Alex is keeping silent hoping something comes up here <G>
PUGDOG® PUGDOG® Enterprises, Inc.
FAQ: http://postcards.com/FAQ