Gossamer Forum
Home : Products : Gossamer Forum : Discussion :

Re: [jagerman] Regarding RedRum's post "Attachment test"

Quote Reply
Re: [jagerman] Regarding RedRum's post "Attachment test" In reply to
Jason

IMO, it should be like this...

[url=parent]Re: [jagerman][/url] Regarding RedRum's post "Attachment test"

The [url=parent]Re: [jagerman][/url] part should be locked and not shown in the post reply window. It should be added after the post it made. The Regarding RedRum's post "Attachment test" can be edited as you wish.

Cheers

Wil

- wil
Subject Author Views Date
Thread Attachment test Jagerman 10553 Oct 30, 2001, 5:05 PM
Thread Re: [jagerman] Attachment test
Jagerman 10243 Oct 30, 2001, 5:06 PM
Thread Re: [jagerman] Attachment test
Jagerman 10268 Oct 30, 2001, 5:07 PM
Post Re: [jagerman] Attachment test
Paul 10279 Oct 30, 2001, 6:11 PM
Thread Re: [jagerman] Attachment test
Paul 10235 Oct 30, 2001, 6:21 PM
Thread Re: [RedRum] Attachment test
Jagerman 10355 Oct 30, 2001, 6:39 PM
Post Re: [jagerman] Attachment test
Paul 10179 Oct 30, 2001, 6:43 PM
Thread Re: [jagerman] Attachment test
Paul 10302 Oct 30, 2001, 6:52 PM
Thread Regarding RedRum's post "Attachment test"
Jagerman 10253 Oct 30, 2001, 7:11 PM
Post Re: [jagerman] Regarding RedRum's post "Attachment test"
Wil 10196 Oct 31, 2001, 1:15 AM
Thread Re: [jagerman] Regarding RedRum's post "Attachment test"
Wil 10203 Oct 31, 2001, 5:49 AM
Thread Re: [Wil] Regarding RedRum's post "Attachment test"
Paul 10262 Oct 31, 2001, 6:02 AM
Thread Re: [RedRum] Regarding RedRum's post "Attachment test"
Wil 10219 Oct 31, 2001, 7:00 AM
Thread Nothing to do with attachment testing
Jagerman 10262 Oct 31, 2001, 10:35 AM
Post Re: [jagerman] Nothing to do with attachment testing
Paul 10298 Oct 31, 2001, 10:38 AM
Thread Re: [jagerman] Nothing to do with attachment testing
QooQ 10558 Oct 31, 2001, 3:52 PM
Post Re: [QooQ] Nothing to do with attachment testing
Paul 10161 Oct 31, 2001, 3:55 PM
Thread Re: [QooQ] Nothing to do with attachment testing
Jagerman 10262 Oct 31, 2001, 3:56 PM
Thread Nothing to do with attachment testing
QooQ 10213 Oct 31, 2001, 4:01 PM
Thread Re: [QooQ] Nothing to do with attachment testing
Paul 10222 Oct 31, 2001, 4:31 PM
Post Re: [RedRum] Nothing to do with attachment testing
QooQ 10246 Oct 31, 2001, 5:15 PM
Thread Re: [jagerman] Parent tag in message header
Wil 10228 Nov 1, 2001, 1:20 AM
Thread Re: [Wil] Parent tag in message header
Paul 10112 Nov 1, 2001, 3:44 AM
Thread Re: [RedRum] Parent tag in message header
Wil 10204 Nov 1, 2001, 4:51 AM
Thread Re: [Wil] Parent tag in message header
Paul 10204 Nov 1, 2001, 5:53 AM
Thread Re: [RedRum] Parent tag in message header
Wil 7243 Nov 1, 2001, 7:15 AM
Thread Re: [Wil] Parent tag in message header
Paul 7072 Nov 1, 2001, 7:20 AM
Thread Post deleted by Wil
Wil 7061 Nov 1, 2001, 7:22 AM
Thread Re: [Paul] Subject: Parent tag in message header
Wil 7019 Nov 1, 2001, 7:24 AM
Thread Re: [Wil] Subject: Parent tag in message header
Paul 7080 Nov 1, 2001, 7:27 AM
Thread Re: [RedRum] Subject: Parent tag in message header
Wil 7046 Nov 1, 2001, 8:38 AM
Thread Re: [Wil] Subject: Parent tag in message header
Wil 6925 Nov 1, 2001, 8:39 AM
Thread Re: [Wil] Subject: Parent tag in message header
Paul 6957 Nov 1, 2001, 8:53 AM
Thread Re: [RedRum] Subject: Parent tag in message header
Wil 7023 Nov 1, 2001, 9:04 AM
Thread Re: [Wil] Subject: Parent tag in message header
Paul 7093 Nov 1, 2001, 9:07 AM
Post Re: [RedRum] Subject: Parent tag in message header
Jagerman 6958 Nov 1, 2001, 10:49 AM
Thread Re: [Wil] Subject: Parent tag in message header
QooQ 7029 Nov 1, 2001, 3:27 PM
Thread Re: [QooQ] Subject: Parent tag in message header
Paul 6910 Nov 1, 2001, 3:40 PM
Post Re: [RedRum] Subject: Parent tag in message header
QooQ 6950 Nov 1, 2001, 3:54 PM
Thread Re: [QooQ] Subject: Parent tag in message header
Paul 7038 Nov 1, 2001, 3:54 PM
Thread Re: [RedRum] Subject: Parent tag in message header
QooQ 6957 Nov 1, 2001, 3:56 PM
Thread Re: [QooQ] Subject: Parent tag in message header
Paul 6891 Nov 1, 2001, 3:57 PM
Post Re: [RedRum] Subject: Parent tag in message header
Wil 6938 Nov 2, 2001, 1:18 AM