Quote:
I have nothing to lose?
Paul... if I had the choice to be hung for "deceiving" the people in this forum and to be called a person who logs into 2 screens to deceive people.. I would rather be hung. My name is my name.. No suffix or prefix shall be given to it.
Do you moderate x amount of forums, do you design templates for GT, do/did you help with GossamerHost support, do you do work for GT clients (Im not talking about Links2 installs).
Can you answer yes to all of those question?...I don't think you can...that is what I stand to lose. Why would I want to risk losing that just because of someone I've never met.
I've tried so many times to make genuine replies to Eliot...no matter _what_ (and I mean no matter what) I say he sees the wrong side of my post and turns it into an argument. Why can't he be like the huge majority of forum users who seem to have no problem understanding what I'm saying in my posts.
Take this thread the otherday, he told someone you used exec cgi when trying to use SSI for a cgi script (when using a query string)...my reply and I quote:
>>
Well just a point to note, he _shouldn't_ have been using exec cgi. When using a query string exec cgi will not work, what he had was fine.
<<
Fairly normal correct?
Eliot says:
>>
I disagree, Paul. He is still "executing" a CGI script, thus the exec cgi is the directive to use in this case.
<<
I say:
>>
Eliot trust me, include virtual is correct.
<<
Again, nothing wrong there right?
So:
>>
Trust you? That's a big laugh. Show me some proof...and I might reconsider my previous statement. But I stand by what I've already posted.
<<
WTF?