Gossamer Forum
Home : Products : Gossamer Forum : Discussion :

Re: [jagerman] Regarding RedRum's post "Attachment test"

Quote Reply
Re: [jagerman] Regarding RedRum's post "Attachment test" In reply to
Jason

IMO, it should be like this...

[url=parent]Re: [jagerman][/url] Regarding RedRum's post "Attachment test"

The [url=parent]Re: [jagerman][/url] part should be locked and not shown in the post reply window. It should be added after the post it made. The Regarding RedRum's post "Attachment test" can be edited as you wish.

Cheers

Wil

- wil
Subject Author Views Date
Thread Attachment test Jagerman 10532 Oct 30, 2001, 5:05 PM
Thread Re: [jagerman] Attachment test
Jagerman 10222 Oct 30, 2001, 5:06 PM
Thread Re: [jagerman] Attachment test
Jagerman 10246 Oct 30, 2001, 5:07 PM
Post Re: [jagerman] Attachment test
Paul 10258 Oct 30, 2001, 6:11 PM
Thread Re: [jagerman] Attachment test
Paul 10214 Oct 30, 2001, 6:21 PM
Thread Re: [RedRum] Attachment test
Jagerman 10333 Oct 30, 2001, 6:39 PM
Post Re: [jagerman] Attachment test
Paul 10157 Oct 30, 2001, 6:43 PM
Thread Re: [jagerman] Attachment test
Paul 10281 Oct 30, 2001, 6:52 PM
Thread Regarding RedRum's post "Attachment test"
Jagerman 10232 Oct 30, 2001, 7:11 PM
Post Re: [jagerman] Regarding RedRum's post "Attachment test"
Wil 10175 Oct 31, 2001, 1:15 AM
Thread Re: [jagerman] Regarding RedRum's post "Attachment test"
Wil 10181 Oct 31, 2001, 5:49 AM
Thread Re: [Wil] Regarding RedRum's post "Attachment test"
Paul 10241 Oct 31, 2001, 6:02 AM
Thread Re: [RedRum] Regarding RedRum's post "Attachment test"
Wil 10197 Oct 31, 2001, 7:00 AM
Thread Nothing to do with attachment testing
Jagerman 10241 Oct 31, 2001, 10:35 AM
Post Re: [jagerman] Nothing to do with attachment testing
Paul 10277 Oct 31, 2001, 10:38 AM
Thread Re: [jagerman] Nothing to do with attachment testing
QooQ 10537 Oct 31, 2001, 3:52 PM
Post Re: [QooQ] Nothing to do with attachment testing
Paul 10140 Oct 31, 2001, 3:55 PM
Thread Re: [QooQ] Nothing to do with attachment testing
Jagerman 10241 Oct 31, 2001, 3:56 PM
Thread Nothing to do with attachment testing
QooQ 10192 Oct 31, 2001, 4:01 PM
Thread Re: [QooQ] Nothing to do with attachment testing
Paul 10200 Oct 31, 2001, 4:31 PM
Post Re: [RedRum] Nothing to do with attachment testing
QooQ 10225 Oct 31, 2001, 5:15 PM
Thread Re: [jagerman] Parent tag in message header
Wil 10207 Nov 1, 2001, 1:20 AM
Thread Re: [Wil] Parent tag in message header
Paul 10091 Nov 1, 2001, 3:44 AM
Thread Re: [RedRum] Parent tag in message header
Wil 10183 Nov 1, 2001, 4:51 AM
Thread Re: [Wil] Parent tag in message header
Paul 10183 Nov 1, 2001, 5:53 AM
Thread Re: [RedRum] Parent tag in message header
Wil 7227 Nov 1, 2001, 7:15 AM
Thread Re: [Wil] Parent tag in message header
Paul 7056 Nov 1, 2001, 7:20 AM
Thread Post deleted by Wil
Wil 7045 Nov 1, 2001, 7:22 AM
Thread Re: [Paul] Subject: Parent tag in message header
Wil 7002 Nov 1, 2001, 7:24 AM
Thread Re: [Wil] Subject: Parent tag in message header
Paul 7064 Nov 1, 2001, 7:27 AM
Thread Re: [RedRum] Subject: Parent tag in message header
Wil 7028 Nov 1, 2001, 8:38 AM
Thread Re: [Wil] Subject: Parent tag in message header
Wil 6909 Nov 1, 2001, 8:39 AM
Thread Re: [Wil] Subject: Parent tag in message header
Paul 6940 Nov 1, 2001, 8:53 AM
Thread Re: [RedRum] Subject: Parent tag in message header
Wil 7006 Nov 1, 2001, 9:04 AM
Thread Re: [Wil] Subject: Parent tag in message header
Paul 7077 Nov 1, 2001, 9:07 AM
Post Re: [RedRum] Subject: Parent tag in message header
Jagerman 6942 Nov 1, 2001, 10:49 AM
Thread Re: [Wil] Subject: Parent tag in message header
QooQ 7013 Nov 1, 2001, 3:27 PM
Thread Re: [QooQ] Subject: Parent tag in message header
Paul 6893 Nov 1, 2001, 3:40 PM
Post Re: [RedRum] Subject: Parent tag in message header
QooQ 6934 Nov 1, 2001, 3:54 PM
Thread Re: [QooQ] Subject: Parent tag in message header
Paul 7022 Nov 1, 2001, 3:54 PM
Thread Re: [RedRum] Subject: Parent tag in message header
QooQ 6941 Nov 1, 2001, 3:56 PM
Thread Re: [QooQ] Subject: Parent tag in message header
Paul 6875 Nov 1, 2001, 3:57 PM
Post Re: [RedRum] Subject: Parent tag in message header
Wil 6922 Nov 2, 2001, 1:18 AM