Gossamer Forum
Home : Products : Links 2.0 : Discussions :

Is links 2.0 Year 2000 compliant?

Quote Reply
Is links 2.0 Year 2000 compliant?
I did a search for this topic but couldn't find much info.

Does any one know if links is 2000 compliant?
Has it been or has anyone tested it?

Cheers
CP
Quote Reply
Re: Is links 2.0 Year 2000 compliant? In reply to
Yes it is.

Regards.

------------------
Eliot Lee
Anthro TECH,L.L.C
www.anthrotech.com
----------------------


Quote Reply
Re: Is links 2.0 Year 2000 compliant? In reply to
Thanks Smile

A simple reply to a simple question.

CP
Quote Reply
Re: Is links 2.0 Year 2000 compliant? In reply to
If Links is y2k compliant (and I sure hope it really is) why is there code that says $year - 1900 in links.cfg under sub date_to_unix {

I don't know much about it, but could this cause a problem?

Adam
Quote Reply
Re: Is links 2.0 Year 2000 compliant? In reply to
i'm not a programmer but this is the correct way to do it. you can read about it at webadverts faq.
Quote Reply
Re: Is links 2.0 Year 2000 compliant? In reply to
Read this Thread for more information....

http://www.gossamer-threads.com/scripts/forum/resources/Forum11/HTML/000137.html

Regards.

------------------
Eliot Lee
Anthro TECH,L.L.C
www.anthrotech.com
----------------------


Quote Reply
Re: Is links 2.0 Year 2000 compliant? In reply to
To see an example of the script that Alex recommends in the other Thread, check out:

www.anthrotech.com/cgibin/misc/y2k.cgi

You will see that the unix_time translates into the different dates appropriately.

Regards.

------------------
Eliot Lee
Anthro TECH,L.L.C
www.anthrotech.com
----------------------