Gossamer Forum
Home : Products : Gossamer Links : Discussions :

Re: [pugdog] Configurable Main field, instead just using fixed URL field

Quote Reply
Re: [pugdog] Configurable Main field, instead just using fixed URL field In reply to
As Paul pointed out, the unique field flag would not result a flexible solution.

Yes, I will likely write a plugin for that task, but I think the idea could be implemented as core part of LSQL, because LSQL need to be more flexible, and not just link (URL) related application.
If I write a plugin, it will be commercial plugin, and some people will be not able to afford to pay for it.
If would be implemented as core part, more people could use it.

Seems that I'm against my business with that suggestion, but as my experience shows, likely my plugin will be even earlier finished, than to see my suggestions implemented into core Links SQL. Unsure

Best regards,
Webmaster33


Paid Support
from Webmaster33. Expert in Perl programming & Gossamer Threads applications. (click here for prices)
Webmaster33's products (upd.2004.09.26) | Private message | Contact me | Was my post helpful? Donate my help...
Subject Author Views Date
Thread Configurable Main field, instead just using fixed URL field webmaster33 3790 Dec 30, 2002, 3:42 AM
Thread Re: [webmaster33] Configurable Main field, instead just using fixed URL field
pugdog 3580 Dec 30, 2002, 12:51 PM
Thread Re: [pugdog] Configurable Main field, instead just using fixed URL field
webmaster33 3626 Dec 30, 2002, 4:44 PM
Thread Re: [webmaster33] Configurable Main field, instead just using fixed URL field
pugdog 3634 Dec 30, 2002, 9:53 PM
Post Re: [pugdog] Configurable Main field, instead just using fixed URL field
Paul 3570 Dec 31, 2002, 2:32 AM
Thread Re: [pugdog] Configurable Main field, instead just using fixed URL field
webmaster33 3623 Dec 31, 2002, 5:54 AM
Thread Re: [webmaster33] Configurable Main field, instead just using fixed URL field
Paul 3585 Dec 31, 2002, 6:31 AM
Post Re: [Paul] Configurable Main field, instead just using fixed URL field
webmaster33 3591 Dec 31, 2002, 7:13 AM