Gossamer Forum
Home : General : Perl Programming :

UltraBoard 2000 vs. Ultimate Bulletin Board

Quote Reply
UltraBoard 2000 vs. Ultimate Bulletin Board
Hi,

I would like to install a forum to my site but I don't know which BBS to prefer. Can someone supply me with pros & cons referring to the above bulletin board systems. UltraBoard 2000 has more than 300 files. Till now, I haven't installed any board.

Phil.
Quote Reply
Re: UltraBoard 2000 vs. Ultimate Bulletin Board In reply to
They are both pretty good products. I would recommend looking at what features each product offers and what would best suit your users, not only you as administrator of the Forum.

Regards,

------------------
Eliot Lee....
Former Handle: Eliot
* Check Resource Center
* Search Forums
Quote Reply
Re: UltraBoard 2000 vs. Ultimate Bulletin Board In reply to
I would suggest checking out WWWThreads as well.

It's SQL backed, and well written, with a good following, and it's a mature program -- it's a 5.0 release, or something like that, and UltraBoard is really pre 1.0 release since the 2000 is a complete rewrite of the 1.62 version, which was also technically a pre-1.0 release, and buggy.

Ultraboards advantage (and limitation) is it's completely modular, and perhaps too modular. Each subroutine is a separate module, and at some point they should be "packaged" and combined just for ease of maintennance.

UltimaeBBS is a standard, but like most standards, it's falling way behind the times.

WWWThreads is a good compromise, and a lot of us are using it, and working on mods to integrate it into Links SQL, and share users and such, so that you might find the slightly higher initial investment will pay off big time down the road.

There are also two other reasonable packages out there;

Sporum and Phorum both of which use SQL, and offer diffrent features and functionality. Sporum is a "clone" or sequel to WWWThreads. I chose WWWThreads over it for aesthetic reasons, more than anything else (I posted a few weeks ago more details).

Phorum is PHP based, and while it's still not complete, you might find that it does what you neeed, and not being perl based, you'll have access to the world of PHP programs that are being written.

I don't push any one product, I think they all have merit, but if you are using Links SQL, WWWThreads has the slight advantage in that a lot of us have switched over to it, and WWWThreads seems to be running Links SQL for their support area -- so development between the two programs will have that added boost. My disclaimer is that there is NO OFFICIAL link between WWWThreads and Link SQL, or whether there will be. A few of us individuals have noticed the similarities and have started exploiting them, that's all.

I tried sporum, phorum, ubbs, wwwthreads and ultrabbs. After 5+ months of testing and trying I finally chose wwwthreads. That was best for my needs, your needs may vary.



Quote Reply
Re: UltraBoard 2000 vs. Ultimate Bulletin Board In reply to
I will try UltraBoard, if I get it run :-)
Quote Reply
Re: UltraBoard 2000 vs. Ultimate Bulletin Board In reply to
I have been looking at discussion boards for a non-profit project (read no budget)

Ikonboard was free but it is 2Meg. A lot of this is graphics. It looks too busy for what I need.

I liked the looks of phorum (clean, simple). The download is something like 92K. I thought the script being small might mean it would run quickly, but after reading around on this board, it appears I shouldn't be comparing php & perl directly.

My site would be a fairly low useage site, but I see Phorum is used for the fairly high traffic scubadiving.com, so that shows some confidence on Rodales part.

The other option was discus from discusware.com. It looks OK and has a fairly simple interface.

It has also been over a year since this original post and I imaging somethings have changed.

I looked at sporum but couldn't find much on the web regarding user comments.

If there are any other insight and/or suggestions for no-budget discussion boards, please update me.

--
Rob Van Deren
BeaverheadRiver.com
SW Montana's Premier Online Directory
Quote Reply
Re: UltraBoard 2000 vs. Ultimate Bulletin Board In reply to
I haven't been able to get to the Ultraboard forums in a long time... are they still around?

- Mark

Astro-Boy!!
http://www.zip.com.au/~astroboy/
Quote Reply
Re: UltraBoard 2000 vs. Ultimate Bulletin Board In reply to
Ultraboard 2000's URL is: www.ub2k.com
Ultimate Bulletin Board was purchased by InfoPop and that URL is: www.infopop.com

--
Rob Van Deren
BeaverheadRiver.com
SW Montana's Premier Online Directory
Quote Reply
Re: UltraBoard 2000 vs. Ultimate Bulletin Board In reply to
Try phpbb

I think you can find it at sourceforge.net

Mods:http://wiredon.net/gt/download.shtml
Installations:http://wiredon.net/gt/
Quote Reply
Re: UltraBoard 2000 vs. Ultimate Bulletin Board In reply to
In Reply To:
Ultimate Bulletin Board was purchased by InfoPop
No it wasn't. It was created by Infopop, only under a previous company name. Wink

Quote Reply
Re: UltraBoard 2000 vs. Ultimate Bulletin Board In reply to
The creator of UBB decided to create a 'holding' company called infopop to house it's wider range of products.

Wil

Quote Reply
Re: UltraBoard 2000 vs. Ultimate Bulletin Board In reply to
http://www.vbulletin.com/.

Nothing else needs to be said.

Quote Reply
Re: UltraBoard 2000 vs. Ultimate Bulletin Board In reply to
Apart from "discuss" is the suckiest board.ever.

Quote Reply
Re: UltraBoard 2000 vs. Ultimate Bulletin Board In reply to
lol.....and vbulletin doesn't work with macs.

Mods:http://wiredon.net/gt/download.shtml
Installations:http://wiredon.net/gt/
Quote Reply
Re: UltraBoard 2000 vs. Ultimate Bulletin Board In reply to
.... and vBulletin is $160 over budget for this project :-)

--
Rob Van Deren
BeaverheadRiver.com
SW Montana's Premier Online Directory
Quote Reply
Re: UltraBoard 2000 vs. Ultimate Bulletin Board In reply to
In Reply To:
Ultraboard 2000's URL is: www.ub2k.com
Yeah, I know that's the address, but I've been getting SQL error's there for a few weeks now...

- Mark

Astro-Boy!!
http://www.zip.com.au/~astroboy/
Quote Reply
Re: UltraBoard 2000 vs. Ultimate Bulletin Board In reply to
The unofficial word is that Ultraboard 2000 www.ub2k.com is out of business.

No official explanation has been given to its registered members, no email on what's going on and no statement on site since they went down several months ago.

Customers have been abandoned by UB2K after helping support this company buy purchasing their softwares.



________________________
Eraser
Insight Eye
http://www.insighteye.com
Quote Reply
Re: UltraBoard 2000 vs. Ultimate Bulletin Board In reply to
I noticed the errors the day I looked over the site. At the time, I figured they were just having a bad day;-)

The forums and download section are down.

First time I have seen a website abaondoned like that. Left running as it slowly falls apart until the hosting runs out. Most seem to immediately turn to 404 errors.

It is too bad someone was not able to purchase the ub2k business and continue it. Maybe the code was facing a major rewrite and it didn't look like it would be worth the effort.

--
Rob Van Deren
BeaverheadRiver.com
SW Montana's Premier Online Directory
Quote Reply
Re: UltraBoard 2000 vs. Ultimate Bulletin Board In reply to
Try Ikonboard too. Very easy to set-up and very customizable. (and free!)

http://www.ikonboard.com

Quote Reply
Re: UltraBoard 2000 vs. Ultimate Bulletin Board In reply to
I looked at Ikonboard and it seemed a little busy to me. The download is 5Meg and it is loaded with graphicical avatars, emoticons, etc. It also didn't look like there was an easy way for a user to change between linear and threaded display of messages.

I looked around some (not a bunch) and didn't find an explanation of how to turn off the heavy graphics and resolve the linear/threaded question.

Anybody have any first hand experience with Ikonboard?

--
Rob Van Deren
BeaverheadRiver.com
SW Montana's Premier Online Directory
Quote Reply
Re: UltraBoard 2000 vs. Ultimate Bulletin Board In reply to
I'm not sure about the linear/threaded question, but I know that in the admin panel you can turn off all the graphics.

I set one up for a friend, that's how I know that they're easy to set-up. I remember seeing options for the graphics, but not the post views.

Quote Reply
Re: UltraBoard 2000 vs. Ultimate Bulletin Board In reply to
The view mode is puerly linear, as are most bulletin board system nowadays. I believe WWWThreads is the only one that offers a choice.

The Ikonboard download is only around 200k for v2 (800k extracted), and around 500k for v3 (2MB extracted), so I'm not sure where you got 5MB from.

- Mark

Astro-Boy!!
http://www.zip.com.au/~astroboy/
Quote Reply
Re: UltraBoard 2000 vs. Ultimate Bulletin Board In reply to
Ikonboard requires 10meg to start and I thought I read somewhere that 5 was for the boards and 5 was for the script and graphics. I can't find the 5 meg reference now, so it may not be correct.

I was also looking at Sporum. The site Hotscripts links to has also been abandoned since July 2000. There are links in the support forum to sporum.org that has taken over the project and maintains the script. They are up to version 3.

I like the option of displaying the forum as Threaded, Nested, Combined or Flat The installation instructions looked a little, uh, daunting to me.

--
Rob Van Deren
BeaverheadRiver.com
SW Montana's Premier Online Directory
Quote Reply
Re: UltraBoard 2000 vs. Ultimate Bulletin Board In reply to
Looks like the purpose of this thread ends with the release of Gossamer Forum 0.9.0.

--
Rob

SW Montana's Online Community
Modular Model Railroading