Excuse me.
I don't like to jump in on flame wars, but I think (personal opinion) I DON'T like your attitude.
I probably wouldn't choose Hyperseek _JUST_ on the basis of that, so, as an ardant Links supporter and user, and one who chose Links and Links SQL over Hyperseek, I _THANK_ you very much for your post, since I'm sure it has helped convince several people that the support and friendliness of the Links people, just can't be beat :)
Thanks again for your input :)
Hope to see you around more, "clearing up" the differences between Links/Links SQL and Hyperseek.
(BTW... it probably (may have?) come off better if you started with "Hi, I'm the author of Hyperseek, and....")
I don't like to jump in on flame wars, but I think (personal opinion) I DON'T like your attitude.
I probably wouldn't choose Hyperseek _JUST_ on the basis of that, so, as an ardant Links supporter and user, and one who chose Links and Links SQL over Hyperseek, I _THANK_ you very much for your post, since I'm sure it has helped convince several people that the support and friendliness of the Links people, just can't be beat :)
Thanks again for your input :)
Hope to see you around more, "clearing up" the differences between Links/Links SQL and Hyperseek.
(BTW... it probably (may have?) come off better if you started with "Hi, I'm the author of Hyperseek, and....")