Gossamer Forum
Home : Products : Links 2.0 : Discussions :

Re: New Feature Request(s)

Quote Reply
Re: New Feature Request(s) In reply to
Hi Andrew,

I'm not really that fond of either ideas. Smile I don't like passwords because experience has shown that people never remember them. I think the current security is adequate:

1. The admin can view the original and new link. Any blatant changes should be noticeable. Also, if the contact email addresses don't match he can verify before approving the change.

2. The site owner is emailed a copy of the changes. If he didn't submit the change, this should raise a flag.

As for expired links, ideally that's what the link verifyier is for. Links don't really expire do they? As long as the information is still there, the link is still good. If the information is stale or outdated, then the link should be removed, not just because it's been in the directory.

Just my 0.02, although I'm always open to other opinions/arguments.


Subject Author Views Date
Thread New Feature Request(s) Andrew Mitcham 3035 Jan 6, 1999, 2:53 PM
Post Re: New Feature Request(s)
Alex 2977 Jan 6, 1999, 6:43 PM
Post Re: New Feature Request(s)
Andrew Mitcham 2977 Jan 6, 1999, 11:14 PM
Post Re: New Feature Request(s)
Onasc 2972 Jan 8, 1999, 2:49 PM
Thread Re: [Andrew Mitcham] New Feature Request(s)
Roy5085 2854 Sep 13, 2002, 9:24 AM
Post Re: [Roy5085] New Feature Request(s)
Stealth 2845 Sep 13, 2002, 3:40 PM