I wanted to buy a "used" DBManSQL license earlier, but found nobody who wanted to sell me one.
If you'd been faster, then we could have been exchange my LSQL license to your DBManSQL one plus money.
I anyway need both LSQL & DBManSQL, but for a cheap exchange it would have been worth to temporarily sell my LSQL license
As for LSQL or DBManSQL discussion.
Both are useful, but each has the area when it should be used.
DBManSQL is useful in those cases, when you want to handle unlimited databases, and want to do complex searches, but hierarchical categories, directory related features are not important.
I already posted an LSQL vs DBManSQL feature comparison here:
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/...i?post=277640#277640
Generally LSQL is for directories, DBManSQL is for databases.
Sorry for being offtopic
Best regards,
Webmaster33
Paid Support from Webmaster33. Expert in Perl programming & Gossamer Threads applications. (click here for prices)
Webmaster33's products (upd.2004.09.26) | Private message | Contact me | Was my post helpful? Donate my help...
If you'd been faster, then we could have been exchange my LSQL license to your DBManSQL one plus money.
I anyway need both LSQL & DBManSQL, but for a cheap exchange it would have been worth to temporarily sell my LSQL license
As for LSQL or DBManSQL discussion.
Both are useful, but each has the area when it should be used.
DBManSQL is useful in those cases, when you want to handle unlimited databases, and want to do complex searches, but hierarchical categories, directory related features are not important.
I already posted an LSQL vs DBManSQL feature comparison here:
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/...i?post=277640#277640
Generally LSQL is for directories, DBManSQL is for databases.
Sorry for being offtopic
Best regards,
Webmaster33
Paid Support from Webmaster33. Expert in Perl programming & Gossamer Threads applications. (click here for prices)
Webmaster33's products (upd.2004.09.26) | Private message | Contact me | Was my post helpful? Donate my help...
