Like everyone else, I may not be picturing what's happening here in my head, but if I were to click on Tacos in your directory, how would you expect the categories to appear in the result?
See, the problem with assigning some designation for subcategories is that the subcategory might later be considered a category of its own right in a listing, and how is the database supposed to know how the data is expected to be displayed? It simply wouldn't be right to have a field for categories, and a different field for subcategories when one expects the same data to appear in each case.
So, all the entries have to be categories, and adjustments need to be made in the template. Now, this might be just speculation, but it appears the category names in %category% might actually be "fully qualified", giving you something to test for when placing your subcategories. In my copy of Links SQL 2.0, I'd look in the categories.html template. Your mileage may differ.
Alan Frayer
Don't just read the news - make the news!
Your World News - http://yourworldnews.frayernet.com
See, the problem with assigning some designation for subcategories is that the subcategory might later be considered a category of its own right in a listing, and how is the database supposed to know how the data is expected to be displayed? It simply wouldn't be right to have a field for categories, and a different field for subcategories when one expects the same data to appear in each case.
So, all the entries have to be categories, and adjustments need to be made in the template. Now, this might be just speculation, but it appears the category names in %category% might actually be "fully qualified", giving you something to test for when placing your subcategories. In my copy of Links SQL 2.0, I'd look in the categories.html template. Your mileage may differ.
Alan Frayer
Don't just read the news - make the news!
Your World News - http://yourworldnews.frayernet.com
