Gossamer Forum
Home : Products : Gossamer Links : Discussions :

Re: [Jag] GT LSQL v3.0.0 poor CSS design bug

Quote Reply
Re: [Jag] GT LSQL v3.0.0 poor CSS design bug In reply to
Yes, I also aggree most of what you wrote.

Quote:
Even though I find that CSS is great, I'm also am getting pretty tired of hearing people saying that tables are bad design and you should use CSS. CSS is far from perfect for every situation and some people seem to think that valid CSS and XHTML is the holy grail, when HTML and table design works in far more browsers than CSS and HTML at the moment simple because older browsers don't understand CSS or badly.

I have the same opinion.

CSS makes development easier, and seems people wants to save work. HTML table based development is difficulter, and most people doesn't like that.
Most of those who replied to this thread are sticking to CSS, because it makes their life easier. Because sometimes it makes possible to shorten a 7 day work down to 1 day. Not CSS will be the real solution, but a better, improved template system, similar to what I suggested:
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/...i?post=279007#279007

Every standard has its place between the the other standards. Also CSS, Flash, and other web solutions. Neither of them is a total solution, and should be used in a limited way. It's not good to have a full Flash site, nor to have full CSS site, nor a full image based site.
We have to find the optimal ratio of these technologies, which may be valid for our site.


Building a page dynamically never was a client-side task (expect Flash, Java, Javascript, but they also has disadvantages).
Dynamic pages was always a server-side task, and LSQL was created exactly for this task.

The bottom line is, that CSS is good, but should be not threated as the overall solution for template themes, just an technology which extends the possibilities of HTML. So the solution to shorten the template & design upgrade time is, to improve the GT template system, to have skeleton based template system.

Like it or not, this is the future. We have reached the limits of the current template system, and need new features to save long and difficult design upgrade tasks. Read my suggestion, and you will see the advantages. Or not Wink

Best regards,
Webmaster33


Paid Support
from Webmaster33. Expert in Perl programming & Gossamer Threads applications. (click here for prices)
Webmaster33's products (upd.2004.09.26) | Private message | Contact me | Was my post helpful? Donate my help...
Subject Author Views Date
Thread; hot thread GT LSQL v3.0.0 poor CSS design bug webmaster33 7720 Apr 11, 2005, 8:53 AM
Thread; hot thread Re: [webmaster33] GT LSQL v3.0.0 poor CSS design bug
Alba 7389 Apr 11, 2005, 9:02 AM
Thread; hot thread Re: [Alba] GT LSQL v3.0.0 poor CSS design bug
webmaster33 7582 Apr 11, 2005, 9:10 AM
Thread; hot thread Re: [webmaster33] GT LSQL v3.0.0 poor CSS design bug
DeadMan 7403 Apr 11, 2005, 9:21 AM
Thread; hot thread Re: [deadroot] GT LSQL v3.0.0 poor CSS design bug
webmaster33 7406 Apr 11, 2005, 9:45 AM
Thread; hot thread Re: [webmaster33] GT LSQL v3.0.0 poor CSS design bug
pugdog 7399 Apr 11, 2005, 10:07 AM
Thread; hot thread Re: [pugdog] GT LSQL v3.0.0 poor CSS design bug
webmaster33 7362 Apr 11, 2005, 10:30 AM
Post; hot thread Re: [webmaster33] GT LSQL v3.0.0 poor CSS design bug
loxly 7364 Apr 11, 2005, 12:08 PM
Thread; hot thread Re: [webmaster33] GT LSQL v3.0.0 poor CSS design bug
DeadMan 7397 Apr 11, 2005, 10:22 AM
Thread; hot thread Re: [deadroot] GT LSQL v3.0.0 poor CSS design bug
pugdog 7455 Apr 11, 2005, 10:25 AM
Thread; hot thread Re: [pugdog] GT LSQL v3.0.0 poor CSS design bug
Andy 7360 Apr 11, 2005, 10:29 AM
Post; hot thread Re: [Andy] GT LSQL v3.0.0 poor CSS design bug
DeadMan 7412 Apr 11, 2005, 10:37 AM
Post; hot thread Re: [webmaster33] GT LSQL v3.0.0 poor CSS design bug
Alba 7414 Apr 11, 2005, 10:13 AM
Thread; hot thread Re: [webmaster33] GT LSQL v3.0.0 poor CSS design bug
Jag 7433 Apr 11, 2005, 1:57 PM
Thread; hot thread Re: [Jag] GT LSQL v3.0.0 poor CSS design bug
pugdog 7340 Apr 11, 2005, 2:13 PM
Post; hot thread Re: [pugdog] GT LSQL v3.0.0 poor CSS design bug
Jag 7333 Apr 11, 2005, 2:49 PM
Post; hot thread Re: [Jag] GT LSQL v3.0.0 poor CSS design bug
webmaster33 7324 Apr 11, 2005, 6:27 PM