Gossamer Forum
Home : Products : Gossamer Links : Discussions :

Re: [brewt] Are LSQL mailing SA Compliant?

Quote Reply
Re: [brewt] Are LSQL mailing SA Compliant? In reply to
Hi Adrian

Quote:
As for the ones that have been reported:
0.3 RM_hm_EmptyMsgid Message ID is empty, or just spaces - probable spamsign

This looks like a custom rule, but you're matching this rule because you're using an SMTP server to send rather than sendmail. It will be fixed in the next release.

Actually No Message-ID/Date part is used by Exim users to filter out Mydoom Worm mails. The ACL that is used in DATA part is:

# Reject on no message-id/date from remote hosts
deny condition = ${if !def:h_Message-ID: {1}}
message = Message SHOULD have Message-ID: but does not
deny condition = ${if !def:h_Date: {1}}
message = Message SHOULD have Date: but does not

Now this woule mean that Any Mailings from LSQL with a Missing Message ID (and all derivatives of GT::MAIL::send call being used in third party plugins) would get blocked at SMTP level if this scheck is built in...

Quote:
These rules are due to you putting HTML in the email templates. They currently only support plain text
Actually Mass Email has the drop down of sending mail as HTML.

Thanx...
HyTC

Last edited by:

HyperTherm: Sep 27, 2004, 8:08 AM
Subject Author Views Date
Thread Are LSQL mailing SA Compliant? HyperTherm 5457 Sep 8, 2004, 3:19 AM
Thread Re: [HyperTherm] Are LSQL mailing SA Compliant?
webmaster33 5180 Sep 8, 2004, 2:10 PM
Thread Re: [webmaster33] Are LSQL mailing SA Compliant?
HyperTherm 5113 Sep 8, 2004, 3:50 PM
Thread Re: [HyperTherm] Are LSQL mailing SA Compliant?
webmaster33 5151 Sep 9, 2004, 1:57 AM
Thread Re: [webmaster33] Are LSQL mailing SA Compliant?
HyperTherm 5128 Sep 9, 2004, 11:45 AM
Thread Re: [HyperTherm] Are LSQL mailing SA Compliant?
webmaster33 5132 Sep 9, 2004, 12:57 PM
Thread Re: [webmaster33] Are LSQL mailing SA Compliant?
HyperTherm 5123 Sep 10, 2004, 4:01 AM
Thread Re: [HyperTherm] Are LSQL mailing SA Compliant?
webmaster33 5094 Sep 10, 2004, 4:45 AM
Thread Re: [webmaster33] Are LSQL mailing SA Compliant?
HyperTherm 5069 Sep 10, 2004, 5:15 AM
Thread Re: [HyperTherm] Are LSQL mailing SA Compliant?
brewt 5039 Sep 17, 2004, 12:25 PM
Post Re: [brewt] Are LSQL mailing SA Compliant?
HyperTherm 5017 Sep 27, 2004, 7:49 AM
Thread Re: [brewt] Are LSQL mailing SA Compliant?
HyperTherm 5025 Oct 8, 2004, 1:36 PM
Thread Re: [HyperTherm] Are LSQL mailing SA Compliant?
HyperTherm 5002 Oct 10, 2004, 5:38 AM
Thread Re: [HyperTherm] Are LSQL mailing SA Compliant?
HyperTherm 5005 Oct 11, 2004, 4:17 AM
Thread Re: [HyperTherm] Are LSQL mailing SA Compliant?
HyperTherm 4937 Oct 26, 2004, 11:56 AM
Post Re: [HyperTherm] Are LSQL mailing SA Compliant?
brewt 4933 Oct 26, 2004, 12:47 PM
Thread Re: [HyperTherm] Are LSQL mailing SA Compliant?
brewt 5120 Sep 9, 2004, 10:47 PM
Post Re: [brewt] Are LSQL mailing SA Compliant?
HyperTherm 5120 Sep 10, 2004, 4:31 AM