Gossamer Forum
Home : Products : Gossamer Links : Discussions :

Re: [webmaster33] Are LSQL mailing SA Compliant?

Quote Reply
Re: [webmaster33] Are LSQL mailing SA Compliant? In reply to
Hmm. Seeing the expanse of the modules apparently adding up to the problem, I personally hope that the solution is made available on priority basis.

While on HTML Mails, again, yes HTML mails cause more scoring (due to more rules) SA. At the same time i hope that HTML Mail feature is not removed from LinksSQL. Moreover, i am just giving header of an Non LinksSQL Automated Mailings going through the same recepient server and it's all HTML Mail (7K) ... without images:

Content-Type: text/html
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivery-Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2004 01:04:37 +0530
Message-Id: 11615246.1094672177411.JavaMail.root@fromsowhere.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Envelope-To: myself@onmydomain.com
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
0.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts
0.1 HTML_60_70 BODY: Message is 60% to 70% HTML
0.5 HTML_SHOUTING9 BODY: HTML has very strong "shouting" markup
0.7 MIME_HTML_NO_CHARSET RAW: Message text in HTML without charset
X-Spam-Score: 1.4

So five rules add up to 1.4
Links SQL 3 rules add upto 2.7

All references in headers which could cause discomfort has been edited...

What are the headers that you would need from LinksSQL Mailings?

[EDIT] On Plugins Issue I am not trying to put the blame on anyone. But it sometimes leads to *not so good experience* when you are showed the tongue either way Paid or free), unless you pay to correct those shortcomings which personally i would never envisage doing so, as otherwise every bug brought to fore would apparently imply that for getting it corrected it would have to be paid up for... or else be at the mercy of the one's responsible for it
[EDIT]

Thanks for bringing this thread to life :)

HyTC

Last edited by:

HyperTherm: Sep 10, 2004, 5:26 AM
Subject Author Views Date
Thread Are LSQL mailing SA Compliant? HyperTherm 5413 Sep 8, 2004, 3:19 AM
Thread Re: [HyperTherm] Are LSQL mailing SA Compliant?
webmaster33 5136 Sep 8, 2004, 2:10 PM
Thread Re: [webmaster33] Are LSQL mailing SA Compliant?
HyperTherm 5069 Sep 8, 2004, 3:50 PM
Thread Re: [HyperTherm] Are LSQL mailing SA Compliant?
webmaster33 5107 Sep 9, 2004, 1:57 AM
Thread Re: [webmaster33] Are LSQL mailing SA Compliant?
HyperTherm 5084 Sep 9, 2004, 11:45 AM
Thread Re: [HyperTherm] Are LSQL mailing SA Compliant?
webmaster33 5087 Sep 9, 2004, 12:57 PM
Thread Re: [webmaster33] Are LSQL mailing SA Compliant?
HyperTherm 5079 Sep 10, 2004, 4:01 AM
Thread Re: [HyperTherm] Are LSQL mailing SA Compliant?
webmaster33 5050 Sep 10, 2004, 4:45 AM
Thread Re: [webmaster33] Are LSQL mailing SA Compliant?
HyperTherm 5025 Sep 10, 2004, 5:15 AM
Thread Re: [HyperTherm] Are LSQL mailing SA Compliant?
brewt 4995 Sep 17, 2004, 12:25 PM
Post Re: [brewt] Are LSQL mailing SA Compliant?
HyperTherm 4972 Sep 27, 2004, 7:49 AM
Thread Re: [brewt] Are LSQL mailing SA Compliant?
HyperTherm 4980 Oct 8, 2004, 1:36 PM
Thread Re: [HyperTherm] Are LSQL mailing SA Compliant?
HyperTherm 4958 Oct 10, 2004, 5:38 AM
Thread Re: [HyperTherm] Are LSQL mailing SA Compliant?
HyperTherm 4961 Oct 11, 2004, 4:17 AM
Thread Re: [HyperTherm] Are LSQL mailing SA Compliant?
HyperTherm 4893 Oct 26, 2004, 11:56 AM
Post Re: [HyperTherm] Are LSQL mailing SA Compliant?
brewt 4889 Oct 26, 2004, 12:47 PM
Thread Re: [HyperTherm] Are LSQL mailing SA Compliant?
brewt 5076 Sep 9, 2004, 10:47 PM
Post Re: [brewt] Are LSQL mailing SA Compliant?
HyperTherm 5076 Sep 10, 2004, 4:31 AM