Hi Alex,
My reason of being confused is:
Since I installed from http, why should certain files and replaced files (by GT) have ownership userid and not nobody. Please note:
Basically my concern is twofold:
If the above two are not functioning as expected then there must be certain packages/scripts etc which could be responsible for this. I have not tried the "Purge Users" utility fearing a catastrophe experienced by certain users earlier.
Could it please be known as to what .pm/script files is needed to be sent to you. Part of admin utility is non functional, even on a test install with latest version which i tried recently.
Thnx
Anup
My reason of being confused is:
Since I installed from http, why should certain files and replaced files (by GT) have ownership userid and not nobody. Please note:
- No wrapper, suEXEC. The Service Provider (i am on dedicated server) would not just install anything without a request being made from my side.
- Currently if i install say FileMan from http, all ownerships are nobody as expected and if installed from shell then it is userid.
Basically my concern is twofold:
- Admin/Delete/Validate user does not delete the user from disk, though it deletes from database. otherwise delete user functions from admin. But the Admin/Delete/Validate option fails to delete the user from disk.
- Purge Messages (Trash for eg) does not remove the message from disk. Empty folder etc from admin deletes the message from disk.
If the above two are not functioning as expected then there must be certain packages/scripts etc which could be responsible for this. I have not tried the "Purge Users" utility fearing a catastrophe experienced by certain users earlier.
Could it please be known as to what .pm/script files is needed to be sent to you. Part of admin utility is non functional, even on a test install with latest version which i tried recently.
Thnx
Anup