If the justification were that Saddam is an evil, dictatorial tyrant that must be taken out for world peace - great, go ahead. But instead the justification, by your own admission, seems to be "we're pretty sure we'll be able to find proof after the war is over." Do you see nothing wrong with that?[/reply]

Everybody agreed, even Hans Blix, that Iraq had not cooperated with the UN inspections, that they had not fulfilled their obligations under various UN resolutions. Banned missiles were discovered and destroyed. Tons of chemical and biological weapons which Iraq admitted to having after the first Gulf War were unaccounted for even though they were required to destroy and account for all of this after GW1.

That in and of itself is justificaton.