There are several things to consider here:
a) the Links 2.0 forums are the oldest forums (next to DBMAN). you question may have been answered 4 years ago and might be on the last page of your search results
b) quite a few users ARE just too plain damn lazy and post without an honest attempt to search on their own.
c) reorganizing a forum and sorting out threads into categories, dumping redundant threads, etc., would take more time than it's worth. I don't get compensated in any form to hange around the Links forums as a moderator when I'm off from work, so spending my time doing that is simply out of the question.
--Philip
Links 2.0 moderator
a) the Links 2.0 forums are the oldest forums (next to DBMAN). you question may have been answered 4 years ago and might be on the last page of your search results
b) quite a few users ARE just too plain damn lazy and post without an honest attempt to search on their own.
c) reorganizing a forum and sorting out threads into categories, dumping redundant threads, etc., would take more time than it's worth. I don't get compensated in any form to hange around the Links forums as a moderator when I'm off from work, so spending my time doing that is simply out of the question.
--Philip
Links 2.0 moderator