Gossamer Forum
Home : Products : Gossamer Links : Discussions :

Database structure in 2.0.5 compared to 2.1.0

Quote Reply
Database structure in 2.0.5 compared to 2.1.0
Ok, I got a really annoying problem here! For some reason, someones database (for an import I am doing, is configured really odd. The tables are, for example;

Build_Update
Category
CategoryAlternates
CategoryHierarchy

What are these tables? I looked in their setup area, and it was set to use Links_ as the table starter, but as you can see this is not the case here.

Anyone shed any light on it?

Thanks

Andy (mod)
andy@ultranerds.co.uk
Want to give me something back for my help? Please see my Amazon Wish List
GLinks ULTRA Package | GLinks ULTRA Package PRO
Links SQL Plugins | Website Design and SEO | UltraNerds | ULTRAGLobals Plugin | Pre-Made Template Sets | FREE GLinks Plugins!
Subject Author Views Date
Thread Database structure in 2.0.5 compared to 2.1.0 Andy 5332 Jan 22, 2002, 9:15 AM
Thread Re: [AndyNewby] Database structure in 2.0.5 compared to 2.1.0
Andy 5224 Jan 22, 2002, 2:26 PM
Post Re: [AndyNewby] Database structure in 2.0.5 compared to 2.1.0
Paul 5100 Jan 22, 2002, 2:27 PM
Thread Re: [AndyNewby] Database structure in 2.0.5 compared to 2.1.0
pugdog 5111 Jan 22, 2002, 2:35 PM
Thread Re: [pugdog] Database structure in 2.0.5 compared to 2.1.0
Andy 5149 Jan 22, 2002, 11:30 PM
Thread Re: [AndyNewby] Database structure in 2.0.5 compared to 2.1.0
pugdog 5174 Jan 23, 2002, 8:04 AM
Post Re: [pugdog] Database structure in 2.0.5 compared to 2.1.0
Andy 5108 Jan 23, 2002, 8:40 AM
Thread Re: [pugdog] Database structure in 2.0.5 compared to 2.1.0
Andy 5071 Jan 23, 2002, 8:46 AM
Thread Re: [AndyNewby] Database structure in 2.0.5 compared to 2.1.0
pugdog 5057 Jan 23, 2002, 11:20 AM
Post Re: [pugdog] Database structure in 2.0.5 compared to 2.1.0
Andy 5090 Jan 23, 2002, 11:27 AM
Post Re: [AndyNewby] Database structure in 2.0.5 compared to 2.1.0
Paul 5153 Jan 22, 2002, 2:38 PM
Post Re: [AndyNewby] Database structure in 2.0.5 compared to 2.1.0
Alex 5134 Jan 22, 2002, 2:45 PM