Gossamer Forum
Home : Products : Gossamer Forum : Discussion :

Re: [Wil] Inconsistent & and ;

Quote Reply
Re: [Wil] Inconsistent & and ; In reply to
If you want it to pass w3c's 4.x strict validation you CAN'T use those depreciated tags. Otherwise you'll have to use transitional. Of course the browsers will work fine as they're made to work with broken non-standard HTML.

In Reply To:
It just means there is a new, and supposedly, better way of doing what you're trying to achieve.
As Jason was trying to point out, not necessarily Smile

Adrian
Subject Author Views Date
Thread Inconsistent & and ; Paul 5136 Jan 10, 2002, 10:38 AM
Thread Re: [RedRum] Inconsistent & and ;
Jagerman 4958 Jan 10, 2002, 11:22 AM
Thread Re: [jagerman] Inconsistent & and ;
Wil 4938 Jan 10, 2002, 11:45 AM
Thread Re: [Wil] Inconsistent & and ;
Jagerman 4935 Jan 10, 2002, 11:55 AM
Thread Re: [jagerman] Inconsistent & and ;
Wil 4924 Jan 10, 2002, 11:59 AM
Thread Re: [Wil] Inconsistent & and ;
Jagerman 4954 Jan 10, 2002, 12:00 PM
Thread Re: [jagerman] Inconsistent & and ;
Wil 4915 Jan 10, 2002, 12:08 PM
Thread Re: [Wil] Inconsistent & and ;
Jagerman 4933 Jan 10, 2002, 12:23 PM
Thread Re: [jagerman] Inconsistent & and ;
Wil 4902 Jan 10, 2002, 12:26 PM
Thread Re: [Wil] Inconsistent & and ;
Jagerman 4913 Jan 10, 2002, 12:40 PM
Thread Re: [jagerman] Inconsistent & and ;
Wil 4930 Jan 10, 2002, 12:49 PM
Thread Re: [Wil] Inconsistent & and ;
brewt 4905 Jan 10, 2002, 12:57 PM
Thread Re: [brewt] Inconsistent & and ;
Wil 4902 Jan 11, 2002, 1:21 AM
Thread Re: [Wil] Inconsistent & and ;
brewt 4884 Jan 11, 2002, 8:50 AM
Post Re: [brewt] Inconsistent & and ;
Wil 4901 Jan 11, 2002, 8:54 AM