Gossamer Forum
Home : Products : Gossamer Links : Discussions :

Re: Category structure

Quote Reply
Re: Category structure In reply to
Well, how would you address M:M connections?? Without creating intersection tables??? It seems that you would be violating Normalization Rules. By simply adding the columns in the Links table (which I did suggest in my REPLY), then you would only be able to add links to ONE type and ONE location.

I would hope that GT would address different relationships/connections for different types of fields/columns in future releases.

Regards,

Eliot Lee
Subject Author Views Date
Thread Category structure cco 3925 Jul 7, 2001, 6:06 PM
Post Re: Category structure
pugdog 3872 Jul 7, 2001, 6:44 PM
Thread Re: Category structure
Stealth 3865 Jul 7, 2001, 6:57 PM
Thread Re: Category structure
pugdog 3873 Jul 7, 2001, 7:12 PM
Thread Re: Category structure
Stealth 3852 Jul 7, 2001, 7:20 PM
Thread Re: Category structure
cco 3852 Jul 8, 2001, 12:05 AM
Thread Re: Category structure
BryanL 3845 Jul 8, 2001, 8:51 AM
Thread Re: Category structure
Stealth 3830 Jul 8, 2001, 9:00 AM
Thread Re: Category structure
BryanL 3816 Jul 8, 2001, 9:17 AM
Post Re: Category structure
Stealth 3845 Jul 8, 2001, 9:37 AM
Post Re: Category structure
pugdog 3833 Jul 8, 2001, 1:45 PM