Gossamer Forum
Home : Products : Gossamer Links : Discussions :

Re: .shtml and links SQL

Quote Reply
Re: .shtml and links SQL In reply to
In Reply To:
It is better to and with html or htm because some search engines may ignore shtm or shtml ending.
Huh?? Now, that's a new one...Which search engines, pray tell, ignore shtml/shtm extensions??? I know that some ignore .cgi/.pl with parameters, but SHTML/SHTM???

Please provide documentation, article references, etc. that explains this. I am curious...

Regards,

Eliot Lee
Subject Author Views Date
Thread .shtml and links SQL zuby84 5378 Mar 20, 2001, 1:24 AM
Post Re: .shtml and links SQL
Mishpat 5257 Mar 20, 2001, 1:42 AM
Thread Re: .shtml and links SQL
mikado 5279 Mar 20, 2001, 8:19 AM
Post Re: .shtml and links SQL
mikado 5239 Mar 20, 2001, 8:20 AM
Thread Re: .shtml and links SQL
Stealth 5290 Mar 20, 2001, 9:41 AM
Thread Re: .shtml and links SQL
padders 5352 Mar 20, 2001, 9:59 AM
Post Re: .shtml and links SQL
Stealth 5267 Mar 20, 2001, 10:19 AM
Thread Re: .shtml and links SQL
Paul 5274 Mar 20, 2001, 10:53 AM
Thread Re: .shtml and links SQL
mdj1 5269 Mar 20, 2001, 11:41 AM
Thread Re: [mdj1] .shtml and links SQL
Welsh Dragon 5151 Oct 24, 2001, 10:09 PM
Thread Re: [CptPugwash] .shtml and links SQL
Alex 5190 Oct 26, 2001, 12:33 AM
Thread Re: [Alex] .shtml and links SQL
Welsh Dragon 5095 Oct 26, 2001, 10:09 AM
Thread Re: [CptPugwash] .shtml and links SQL
Alex 5106 Oct 27, 2001, 11:48 AM
Post Re: [Alex] .shtml and links SQL
Welsh Dragon 5090 Oct 27, 2001, 3:59 PM