I would like to thank pugdog for addressing this issue and for fixing my problem. And I am stumped as well...I looked all over the codes to find where (1) is defined...and don't see it.
I was thinking (I know...dangerous ), pugdog, that the reason that this is not a wide spread problem is that most Links SQL users are upgrading their sites from earlier versions of the flat file version of Links and they are using their current category structure. I don't know...just a thought.
Regards,
Eliot Lee
I was thinking (I know...dangerous ), pugdog, that the reason that this is not a wide spread problem is that most Links SQL users are upgrading their sites from earlier versions of the flat file version of Links and they are using their current category structure. I don't know...just a thought.
Regards,
Eliot Lee