>>
The whole bad_html.gif was a bit exageratted. He posted a screenshot of a low resolution.
<<
That was based on past posts in the forum which you haven't seen.
>>
Agreed or no? You understand I'm not blaming it on you now? I'm just saying you didn't see things as they appear to others.
<<
Of course, I never think I'm always right or I'm a God but the reason you are siding with ELiot is because you don't know the past (that's not your fault)....all you are seeing in the thread in it's slightly ambiguous context...for example you picked up on the image I uploaded and thought I was wrong to do that...on the face of it I agree but when you've had Eliot do that to you about 5 times in the past (which I have, along with smutty remarks) then you start to realise why I did it and why I got annoyed.
The whole bad_html.gif was a bit exageratted. He posted a screenshot of a low resolution.
<<
That was based on past posts in the forum which you haven't seen.
>>
Agreed or no? You understand I'm not blaming it on you now? I'm just saying you didn't see things as they appear to others.
<<
Of course, I never think I'm always right or I'm a God but the reason you are siding with ELiot is because you don't know the past (that's not your fault)....all you are seeing in the thread in it's slightly ambiguous context...for example you picked up on the image I uploaded and thought I was wrong to do that...on the face of it I agree but when you've had Eliot do that to you about 5 times in the past (which I have, along with smutty remarks) then you start to realise why I did it and why I got annoyed.