Hi.
Every page access is in fact two cgi accesses like this:
1. Conventional Templates As With Gossamer Mail...
login.cgi?t=template;page=style.css
webmail.cgi?sid=;...
With the conventional templates which come with Gossamer Mail....
As against this:
(2) .Modified to replace the login.cgi?t=template;page=style.css
<%include style.css%>
is just webmail.cgi?sid=;....
and also the content served is lower by about 3K (mod_gzip working) if the content in conventional templates is compared.
Qstns:
Is the second option technically correct? Apparently 3K per access is savings on bandwidth.
Having style.css in images directory had further lowered the content by 1 K but then it messed up many things perhaps because it wasn't doen properly ...
Thanx...
HyTC
Every page access is in fact two cgi accesses like this:
1. Conventional Templates As With Gossamer Mail...
login.cgi?t=template;page=style.css
webmail.cgi?sid=;...
With the conventional templates which come with Gossamer Mail....
As against this:
(2) .Modified to replace the login.cgi?t=template;page=style.css
<%include style.css%>
is just webmail.cgi?sid=;....
and also the content served is lower by about 3K (mod_gzip working) if the content in conventional templates is compared.
Qstns:
Is the second option technically correct? Apparently 3K per access is savings on bandwidth.
Having style.css in images directory had further lowered the content by 1 K but then it messed up many things perhaps because it wasn't doen properly ...
Thanx...
HyTC