Gossamer Forum
Home : Products : Links 2.0 : Discussions :

Bug in top rates :no or one link with rating=10?

Quote Reply
Bug in top rates :no or one link with rating=10?
Hello

i've posted a similar question in customized forum, but i think that the better place is here. Sorry 4 the trouble...

I've seen that on my rates pages in rating section,
only one link with 10 (rating) is allowed.
the others links with 10 (rating + more than 10 votes) are invisible.
(no problem with top rates in votes number section).

--------------Like this------------------------------

Top 10 Resources (by Rating) -- with at least 10 votes

Rating # Votes Resource
10 101 popo
7 10 demo

Top 10 Resources (by Votes) -- with at least 10 votes
Rating # Votes Resource
10 101 popo
10 15 ilaooo
10 11 testie
10 11 lapin
7 10 demo

You can see that 3 others links with rating = 10 (ilaooo, testie and lapin) are invisibles in top ressource by rating ...
if there are more links with rating=10, it seems that
the space between links with ratin=10 and the links with ratings=9.5 or 7 or 5... (rating) become more important...

But if I rated or changed the rating of the 3 others links (ilaooo, testie or lapin) with rating=10, their ratings change and they appear in Top rates by rating :


-------------Like this-------------------------------------


Top 10 Resources (by Rating) -- with at least 10 votes

Rating # Votes Resource
10 101 popo
9.87 15 ilaooo
9.82 11 testie
9.82 11 lapin
7 10 demo

Top 10 Resources (by Votes) -- with at least 10 votes

Rating # Votes Resource
10 101 popo
9.87 15 ilaooo
9.82 11 testie
9.82 11 lapin
7 10 demo


So i supposed that Top rates allows only one links with 10 (rating). But perhaps i have made a mistake...

1) Is my links.db corrupted?
(I've added some links, but when i added some new fields in links.def, i've erased the older links.db and linksid.txt (and other files in data directory), and put new blank links.db and linksid.txt (and the other files in data directory) of links2.zip,
and next, i've added the following links in the links.db (via administration screen) :

3|ilaooo|http://www.ilaoo.com|28-Jul-2000|puloo|dede|de|dede@mail.com|12|Yes|Yes|9.87|15|No|dede|de|de|de|No|Allemand|de|de|de|d|ed|ed|de
4|testie|http://www.biloo.com|28-Jul-2000|puloo|dede|de|dede@mail.com|1|Yes|No|9.82|11|No|dede|de|de|de|No|Espagnol|de|de|de|de|de|de|de
5|lapin|http://www.liloo.com|28-Jul-2000|puloo|de|de|dede@mail.com|10|Yes|No|9.82|11|No|de|de|de|de|No|Allemand|de|de|de|de|de|de|de
6|popo|http://www.pourkoi.com|28-Jul-2000|puloo|de|de|dede@mail.com|10|Yes|No|9.99|101|No|de|de|dede|de|No|Allemand|de|de|de|de|d|e|de
7|demo|http://www.com.com|28-Jul-2000|puloo|de|de|e@mail.com|12|Yes|Yes|7|10|No|de|de|de|de|Yes|Allemand|de|de|de|de|de|de|de

Is my links.db corrupted?


* There is perhaps another problem,
when i've transfered some files with installation of links,
CuteFTP said :
warning ! 414 bare linefields receivec in ASCII mode, File may have not transfer correctly (with template.pl et site_html_template.pl)
Does it matter?

* Or perhaps all is allright,
and top rates allows only one link with rating = 10 ???

Sorry for all my questions and long thread... and
Thanks for your help :o)

Ciao

Jud


PS: Now, I try to add links with rating=10,
but there is no link with rating=10 which appear in top rates by rating. They appear only in the second section with classement by nombers of votes... strange...
Subject Author Views Date
Thread Bug in top rates :no or one link with rating=10? jude 2898 Jul 28, 2000, 7:29 PM
Thread Re: Bug in top rates :no or one link with rating=10?
jude 2777 Jul 29, 2000, 6:47 AM
Thread Re: Bug in top rates :no or one link with rating=10?
sponge 2790 Jul 29, 2000, 7:15 AM
Thread Re: Bug in top rates :no or one link with rating=10?
jude 2746 Jul 30, 2000, 7:00 AM
Thread Re: Bug in top rates :no or one link with rating=10?
sponge 2742 Jul 30, 2000, 10:06 AM
Post Re: Bug in top rates :no or one link with rating=10?
jude 2745 Jul 30, 2000, 4:47 PM
Post Re: [jude] Bug in top rates :no or one link with rating=10?
rcull 2668 Jun 26, 2004, 10:30 AM