Gossamer Forum
(Advanced Search)
for
Home : Products : Links 2.0 : Discussions :

Re: [ceniti] Browser compatibility

Feb 14, 2002, 5:56 AM
Paul
Veteran (19537 posts)
Feb 14, 2002, 5:56 AM
Views: 5312
Shortcut
Quote Reply
Re: [ceniti] Browser compatibility In reply to
Those two examples you gave have different meanings.

Netscape would have terrible complaints if paths like /images/image.gif didn't work.

Perhaps you had ../path/image.gif but the relativity was incorrect?...or was it something I did?

Last edited by:

RedRum: Feb 14, 2002, 5:57 AM
Subject Author Views Date
Thread Browser compatibility ceniti 5376 Feb 13, 2002, 3:19 PM
Thread Re: [ceniti] Browser compatibility 		Paul 5278 Feb 14, 2002, 2:12 AM
Thread Re: [RedRum] Browser compatibility 		ceniti 5261 Feb 14, 2002, 5:55 AM
Thread Re: [ceniti] Browser compatibility 		Paul 5312 Feb 14, 2002, 5:56 AM
Thread Re: [RedRum] Browser compatibility 		ceniti 5287 Feb 14, 2002, 6:06 AM
Thread Re: [ceniti] Browser compatibility 		Paul 5229 Feb 14, 2002, 6:17 AM
Thread Re: [RedRum] Browser compatibility 		ceniti 5213 Feb 14, 2002, 6:35 AM
Thread Re: [ceniti] Browser compatibility 		Stealth 5223 Feb 14, 2002, 7:25 AM
Thread Re: [Heckler] Browser compatibility 		ceniti 5199 Feb 14, 2002, 7:33 AM
Thread Re: [ceniti] Browser compatibility 		Stealth 5250 Feb 14, 2002, 7:35 AM
Thread Re: [Heckler] Browser compatibility 		ceniti 5233 Feb 14, 2002, 7:44 AM
Thread Re: [ceniti] Browser compatibility 		Stealth 5200 Feb 14, 2002, 7:54 AM
Thread Re: [Heckler] Browser compatibility 		ceniti 5238 Feb 14, 2002, 8:03 AM
Post Re: [ceniti] Browser compatibility 		Stealth 5191 Feb 14, 2002, 8:48 AM