Gossamer Forum
Home : Products : Gossamer Forum : Discussion :

Re: [jagerman] Regarding RedRum's post "Attachment test"

Quote Reply
Re: [jagerman] Regarding RedRum's post "Attachment test" In reply to
Jason

IMO, it should be like this...

[url=parent]Re: [jagerman][/url] Regarding RedRum's post "Attachment test"

The [url=parent]Re: [jagerman][/url] part should be locked and not shown in the post reply window. It should be added after the post it made. The Regarding RedRum's post "Attachment test" can be edited as you wish.

Cheers

Wil

- wil
Subject Author Views Date
Thread Attachment test Jagerman 6838 Oct 30, 2001, 5:05 PM
Thread Re: [jagerman] Attachment test
Jagerman 6587 Oct 30, 2001, 5:06 PM
Thread Re: [jagerman] Attachment test
Jagerman 6647 Oct 30, 2001, 5:07 PM
Post Re: [jagerman] Attachment test
Paul 6666 Oct 30, 2001, 6:11 PM
Thread Re: [jagerman] Attachment test
Paul 6611 Oct 30, 2001, 6:21 PM
Thread Re: [RedRum] Attachment test
Jagerman 6725 Oct 30, 2001, 6:39 PM
Post Re: [jagerman] Attachment test
Paul 6552 Oct 30, 2001, 6:43 PM
Thread Re: [jagerman] Attachment test
Paul 6661 Oct 30, 2001, 6:52 PM
Thread Regarding RedRum's post "Attachment test"
Jagerman 6631 Oct 30, 2001, 7:11 PM
Post Re: [jagerman] Regarding RedRum's post "Attachment test"
Wil 6571 Oct 31, 2001, 1:15 AM
Thread Re: [jagerman] Regarding RedRum's post "Attachment test"
Wil 6573 Oct 31, 2001, 5:49 AM
Thread Re: [Wil] Regarding RedRum's post "Attachment test"
Paul 6640 Oct 31, 2001, 6:02 AM
Thread Re: [RedRum] Regarding RedRum's post "Attachment test"
Wil 6609 Oct 31, 2001, 7:00 AM
Thread Nothing to do with attachment testing
Jagerman 6605 Oct 31, 2001, 10:35 AM
Post Re: [jagerman] Nothing to do with attachment testing
Paul 6671 Oct 31, 2001, 10:38 AM
Thread Re: [jagerman] Nothing to do with attachment testing
QooQ 6649 Oct 31, 2001, 3:52 PM
Post Re: [QooQ] Nothing to do with attachment testing
Paul 6549 Oct 31, 2001, 3:55 PM
Thread Re: [QooQ] Nothing to do with attachment testing
Jagerman 6629 Oct 31, 2001, 3:56 PM
Thread Nothing to do with attachment testing
QooQ 6583 Oct 31, 2001, 4:01 PM
Thread Re: [QooQ] Nothing to do with attachment testing
Paul 6599 Oct 31, 2001, 4:31 PM
Post Re: [RedRum] Nothing to do with attachment testing
QooQ 6622 Oct 31, 2001, 5:15 PM
Thread Re: [jagerman] Parent tag in message header
Wil 6596 Nov 1, 2001, 1:20 AM
Thread Re: [Wil] Parent tag in message header
Paul 6506 Nov 1, 2001, 3:44 AM
Thread Re: [RedRum] Parent tag in message header
Wil 6509 Nov 1, 2001, 4:51 AM
Thread Re: [Wil] Parent tag in message header
Paul 6587 Nov 1, 2001, 5:53 AM
Thread Re: [RedRum] Parent tag in message header
Wil 4547 Nov 1, 2001, 7:15 AM
Thread Re: [Wil] Parent tag in message header
Paul 4475 Nov 1, 2001, 7:20 AM
Thread Post deleted by Wil
Wil 4449 Nov 1, 2001, 7:22 AM
Thread Re: [Paul] Subject: Parent tag in message header
Wil 4452 Nov 1, 2001, 7:24 AM
Thread Re: [Wil] Subject: Parent tag in message header
Paul 4513 Nov 1, 2001, 7:27 AM
Thread Re: [RedRum] Subject: Parent tag in message header
Wil 4474 Nov 1, 2001, 8:38 AM
Thread Re: [Wil] Subject: Parent tag in message header
Wil 4347 Nov 1, 2001, 8:39 AM
Thread Re: [Wil] Subject: Parent tag in message header
Paul 4383 Nov 1, 2001, 8:53 AM
Thread Re: [RedRum] Subject: Parent tag in message header
Wil 4444 Nov 1, 2001, 9:04 AM
Thread Re: [Wil] Subject: Parent tag in message header
Paul 4512 Nov 1, 2001, 9:07 AM
Post Re: [RedRum] Subject: Parent tag in message header
Jagerman 4396 Nov 1, 2001, 10:49 AM
Thread Re: [Wil] Subject: Parent tag in message header
QooQ 4452 Nov 1, 2001, 3:27 PM
Thread Re: [QooQ] Subject: Parent tag in message header
Paul 4327 Nov 1, 2001, 3:40 PM
Post Re: [RedRum] Subject: Parent tag in message header
QooQ 4368 Nov 1, 2001, 3:54 PM
Thread Re: [QooQ] Subject: Parent tag in message header
Paul 4424 Nov 1, 2001, 3:54 PM
Thread Re: [RedRum] Subject: Parent tag in message header
QooQ 4407 Nov 1, 2001, 3:56 PM
Thread Re: [QooQ] Subject: Parent tag in message header
Paul 4317 Nov 1, 2001, 3:57 PM
Post Re: [RedRum] Subject: Parent tag in message header
Wil 4383 Nov 2, 2001, 1:18 AM