Gossamer Forum
Home : Products : Gossamer Forum : Discussion :

Re: [jagerman] Regarding RedRum's post "Attachment test"

Quote Reply
Re: [jagerman] Regarding RedRum's post "Attachment test" In reply to
Jason

IMO, it should be like this...

[url=parent]Re: [jagerman][/url] Regarding RedRum's post "Attachment test"

The [url=parent]Re: [jagerman][/url] part should be locked and not shown in the post reply window. It should be added after the post it made. The Regarding RedRum's post "Attachment test" can be edited as you wish.

Cheers

Wil

- wil
Subject Author Views Date
Thread Attachment test Jagerman 7255 Oct 30, 2001, 5:05 PM
Thread Re: [jagerman] Attachment test
Jagerman 6991 Oct 30, 2001, 5:06 PM
Thread Re: [jagerman] Attachment test
Jagerman 7046 Oct 30, 2001, 5:07 PM
Post Re: [jagerman] Attachment test
Paul 7070 Oct 30, 2001, 6:11 PM
Thread Re: [jagerman] Attachment test
Paul 7013 Oct 30, 2001, 6:21 PM
Thread Re: [RedRum] Attachment test
Jagerman 7134 Oct 30, 2001, 6:39 PM
Post Re: [jagerman] Attachment test
Paul 6948 Oct 30, 2001, 6:43 PM
Thread Re: [jagerman] Attachment test
Paul 7065 Oct 30, 2001, 6:52 PM
Thread Regarding RedRum's post "Attachment test"
Jagerman 7037 Oct 30, 2001, 7:11 PM
Post Re: [jagerman] Regarding RedRum's post "Attachment test"
Wil 6967 Oct 31, 2001, 1:15 AM
Thread Re: [jagerman] Regarding RedRum's post "Attachment test"
Wil 6975 Oct 31, 2001, 5:49 AM
Thread Re: [Wil] Regarding RedRum's post "Attachment test"
Paul 7045 Oct 31, 2001, 6:02 AM
Thread Re: [RedRum] Regarding RedRum's post "Attachment test"
Wil 7007 Oct 31, 2001, 7:00 AM
Thread Nothing to do with attachment testing
Jagerman 7019 Oct 31, 2001, 10:35 AM
Post Re: [jagerman] Nothing to do with attachment testing
Paul 7075 Oct 31, 2001, 10:38 AM
Thread Re: [jagerman] Nothing to do with attachment testing
QooQ 7075 Oct 31, 2001, 3:52 PM
Post Re: [QooQ] Nothing to do with attachment testing
Paul 6945 Oct 31, 2001, 3:55 PM
Thread Re: [QooQ] Nothing to do with attachment testing
Jagerman 7030 Oct 31, 2001, 3:56 PM
Thread Nothing to do with attachment testing
QooQ 6988 Oct 31, 2001, 4:01 PM
Thread Re: [QooQ] Nothing to do with attachment testing
Paul 7001 Oct 31, 2001, 4:31 PM
Post Re: [RedRum] Nothing to do with attachment testing
QooQ 7023 Oct 31, 2001, 5:15 PM
Thread Re: [jagerman] Parent tag in message header
Wil 6991 Nov 1, 2001, 1:20 AM
Thread Re: [Wil] Parent tag in message header
Paul 6912 Nov 1, 2001, 3:44 AM
Thread Re: [RedRum] Parent tag in message header
Wil 6948 Nov 1, 2001, 4:51 AM
Thread Re: [Wil] Parent tag in message header
Paul 6991 Nov 1, 2001, 5:53 AM
Thread Re: [RedRum] Parent tag in message header
Wil 4828 Nov 1, 2001, 7:15 AM
Thread Re: [Wil] Parent tag in message header
Paul 4767 Nov 1, 2001, 7:20 AM
Thread Post deleted by Wil
Wil 4725 Nov 1, 2001, 7:22 AM
Thread Re: [Paul] Subject: Parent tag in message header
Wil 4725 Nov 1, 2001, 7:24 AM
Thread Re: [Wil] Subject: Parent tag in message header
Paul 4791 Nov 1, 2001, 7:27 AM
Thread Re: [RedRum] Subject: Parent tag in message header
Wil 4742 Nov 1, 2001, 8:38 AM
Thread Re: [Wil] Subject: Parent tag in message header
Wil 4628 Nov 1, 2001, 8:39 AM
Thread Re: [Wil] Subject: Parent tag in message header
Paul 4654 Nov 1, 2001, 8:53 AM
Thread Re: [RedRum] Subject: Parent tag in message header
Wil 4727 Nov 1, 2001, 9:04 AM
Thread Re: [Wil] Subject: Parent tag in message header
Paul 4788 Nov 1, 2001, 9:07 AM
Post Re: [RedRum] Subject: Parent tag in message header
Jagerman 4668 Nov 1, 2001, 10:49 AM
Thread Re: [Wil] Subject: Parent tag in message header
QooQ 4730 Nov 1, 2001, 3:27 PM
Thread Re: [QooQ] Subject: Parent tag in message header
Paul 4599 Nov 1, 2001, 3:40 PM
Post Re: [RedRum] Subject: Parent tag in message header
QooQ 4641 Nov 1, 2001, 3:54 PM
Thread Re: [QooQ] Subject: Parent tag in message header
Paul 4708 Nov 1, 2001, 3:54 PM
Thread Re: [RedRum] Subject: Parent tag in message header
QooQ 4678 Nov 1, 2001, 3:56 PM
Thread Re: [QooQ] Subject: Parent tag in message header
Paul 4595 Nov 1, 2001, 3:57 PM
Post Re: [RedRum] Subject: Parent tag in message header
Wil 4651 Nov 2, 2001, 1:18 AM