Gossamer Forum
Home : Products : Gossamer Forum : Discussion :

Re: [jagerman] Regarding RedRum's post "Attachment test"

Quote Reply
Re: [jagerman] Regarding RedRum's post "Attachment test" In reply to
Jason

IMO, it should be like this...

[url=parent]Re: [jagerman][/url] Regarding RedRum's post "Attachment test"

The [url=parent]Re: [jagerman][/url] part should be locked and not shown in the post reply window. It should be added after the post it made. The Regarding RedRum's post "Attachment test" can be edited as you wish.

Cheers

Wil

- wil
Subject Author Views Date
Thread Attachment test Jagerman 6140 Oct 30, 2001, 5:05 PM
Thread Re: [jagerman] Attachment test
Jagerman 5914 Oct 30, 2001, 5:06 PM
Thread Re: [jagerman] Attachment test
Jagerman 5976 Oct 30, 2001, 5:07 PM
Post Re: [jagerman] Attachment test
Paul 5997 Oct 30, 2001, 6:11 PM
Thread Re: [jagerman] Attachment test
Paul 5944 Oct 30, 2001, 6:21 PM
Thread Re: [RedRum] Attachment test
Jagerman 6042 Oct 30, 2001, 6:39 PM
Post Re: [jagerman] Attachment test
Paul 5886 Oct 30, 2001, 6:43 PM
Thread Re: [jagerman] Attachment test
Paul 5986 Oct 30, 2001, 6:52 PM
Thread Regarding RedRum's post "Attachment test"
Jagerman 5960 Oct 30, 2001, 7:11 PM
Post Re: [jagerman] Regarding RedRum's post "Attachment test"
Wil 5906 Oct 31, 2001, 1:15 AM
Thread Re: [jagerman] Regarding RedRum's post "Attachment test"
Wil 5907 Oct 31, 2001, 5:49 AM
Thread Re: [Wil] Regarding RedRum's post "Attachment test"
Paul 5973 Oct 31, 2001, 6:02 AM
Thread Re: [RedRum] Regarding RedRum's post "Attachment test"
Wil 5944 Oct 31, 2001, 7:00 AM
Thread Nothing to do with attachment testing
Jagerman 5932 Oct 31, 2001, 10:35 AM
Post Re: [jagerman] Nothing to do with attachment testing
Paul 5997 Oct 31, 2001, 10:38 AM
Thread Re: [jagerman] Nothing to do with attachment testing
QooQ 5972 Oct 31, 2001, 3:52 PM
Post Re: [QooQ] Nothing to do with attachment testing
Paul 5883 Oct 31, 2001, 3:55 PM
Thread Re: [QooQ] Nothing to do with attachment testing
Jagerman 5965 Oct 31, 2001, 3:56 PM
Thread Nothing to do with attachment testing
QooQ 5919 Oct 31, 2001, 4:01 PM
Thread Re: [QooQ] Nothing to do with attachment testing
Paul 5931 Oct 31, 2001, 4:31 PM
Post Re: [RedRum] Nothing to do with attachment testing
QooQ 5951 Oct 31, 2001, 5:15 PM
Thread Re: [jagerman] Parent tag in message header
Wil 5928 Nov 1, 2001, 1:20 AM
Thread Re: [Wil] Parent tag in message header
Paul 5839 Nov 1, 2001, 3:44 AM
Thread Re: [RedRum] Parent tag in message header
Wil 5836 Nov 1, 2001, 4:51 AM
Thread Re: [Wil] Parent tag in message header
Paul 5912 Nov 1, 2001, 5:53 AM
Thread Re: [RedRum] Parent tag in message header
Wil 4069 Nov 1, 2001, 7:15 AM
Thread Re: [Wil] Parent tag in message header
Paul 3986 Nov 1, 2001, 7:20 AM
Thread Post deleted by Wil
Wil 3978 Nov 1, 2001, 7:22 AM
Thread Re: [Paul] Subject: Parent tag in message header
Wil 3980 Nov 1, 2001, 7:24 AM
Thread Re: [Wil] Subject: Parent tag in message header
Paul 4040 Nov 1, 2001, 7:27 AM
Thread Re: [RedRum] Subject: Parent tag in message header
Wil 4005 Nov 1, 2001, 8:38 AM
Thread Re: [Wil] Subject: Parent tag in message header
Wil 3878 Nov 1, 2001, 8:39 AM
Thread Re: [Wil] Subject: Parent tag in message header
Paul 3917 Nov 1, 2001, 8:53 AM
Thread Re: [RedRum] Subject: Parent tag in message header
Wil 3966 Nov 1, 2001, 9:04 AM
Thread Re: [Wil] Subject: Parent tag in message header
Paul 4039 Nov 1, 2001, 9:07 AM
Post Re: [RedRum] Subject: Parent tag in message header
Jagerman 3928 Nov 1, 2001, 10:49 AM
Thread Re: [Wil] Subject: Parent tag in message header
QooQ 3980 Nov 1, 2001, 3:27 PM
Thread Re: [QooQ] Subject: Parent tag in message header
Paul 3851 Nov 1, 2001, 3:40 PM
Post Re: [RedRum] Subject: Parent tag in message header
QooQ 3888 Nov 1, 2001, 3:54 PM
Thread Re: [QooQ] Subject: Parent tag in message header
Paul 3943 Nov 1, 2001, 3:54 PM
Thread Re: [RedRum] Subject: Parent tag in message header
QooQ 3937 Nov 1, 2001, 3:56 PM
Thread Re: [QooQ] Subject: Parent tag in message header
Paul 3847 Nov 1, 2001, 3:57 PM
Post Re: [RedRum] Subject: Parent tag in message header
Wil 3909 Nov 2, 2001, 1:18 AM