Gossamer Forum
Home : Products : Gossamer Mail : Discussion :

Re: [BUG in 2.0.1]

Quote Reply
Re: [BUG in 2.0.1] In reply to
Hello Alex!

I trust you but from the password and login-info, one could change the domain DNS info. The account is sub-judice and therefore I had to give a Notorised bond as well as Network Sol. to the courts.

I may have to declare to the courts if you want an access.

There is a company who collected 400$ Million from the public (Young cyber enterprenuers) and has sued me for some conflict, for no reason, HA!!! They lost in the second round also. But it continues.

If you want, I may send the Lockin certificate by registered Mail that you may have to go to a notory Public and sign-in under oath. Wanna do this?

------------------------------------------------

First, I had email, Validation option turned on. It never worked great.

I changed to Auto Validation, when I saw that it was not working at all.

Then I changed to Q & A option as an extra addition, like yahoo, for additional security.

What happened that it is not sending password to the user anymore.

#

Thats nothing to do with my own installation, I beleive.

Its the concept of design.

Thats the problem.

So, therefore, Half the users are having password Q & A and half not.

Many users or most users give a free email service account. They would like to have an optional email address to have their passwords, if they forget, but otherwise they would go for Q & A!

Hence this both is necessary. But this does not work togather, unfortunately. When the user tries to get a password through email, and if he did not have the Q&A, because the old system did not insert at all, then he cannot get it anymore.

Thats the problem.




Subject Author Views Date
Thread LOST PASSWORD dearnet 4901 Jun 30, 2001, 3:14 AM
Thread Re: [BUG in 2.0.1]
Alex 4781 Jun 30, 2001, 10:52 AM
Thread Re: [BUG in 2.0.1]
dearnet 4761 Jun 30, 2001, 10:56 AM
Thread Re: [BUG in 2.0.1]
Alex 4813 Jun 30, 2001, 11:03 AM
Post Re: [BUG in 2.0.1]
dearnet 4797 Jun 30, 2001, 11:08 AM
Thread Re: [BUG in 2.0.1]
dearnet 4753 Jul 17, 2001, 9:23 AM
Thread Re: [BUG in 2.0.1]
dearnet 4723 Jul 20, 2001, 1:22 PM
Thread Re: [BUG in 2.0.1]
dearnet 4703 Jul 23, 2001, 1:41 PM
Post Re: [BUG in 2.0.1]
dearnet 4675 Jul 26, 2001, 10:27 PM
Thread Re: [BUG in 2.0.1]
dearnet 4607 Sep 8, 2001, 1:00 AM
Thread Re: [BUG in 2.0.1]
Bmxer 4629 Sep 8, 2001, 7:05 AM
Thread Re: [BUG in 2.0.1]
Paul 4656 Sep 8, 2001, 7:32 AM
Thread Re: [BUG in 2.0.1]
dearnet 4624 Sep 8, 2001, 8:55 AM
Thread Re: [BUG in 2.0.1]
Alex 4562 Sep 10, 2001, 12:54 PM
Post Re: [BUG in 2.0.1]
dearnet 4536 Sep 10, 2001, 3:23 PM
Thread Re: [BUG in 2.0.1]
dearnet 4551 Sep 10, 2001, 3:33 PM
Thread Re: [BUG in 2.0.1]
Alex 4548 Sep 10, 2001, 5:02 PM
Post Re: [BUG in 2.0.1]
dearnet 4492 Sep 11, 2001, 12:46 AM
Thread Re: [BUG in 2.0.1]
dearnet 4601 Sep 8, 2001, 8:52 AM
Post Re: [BUG in 2.0.1]
Paul 4584 Sep 8, 2001, 8:57 AM