Login | Register For Free | Help
Search for: (Advanced)

Mailing List Archive: Zope: Users

ZeoRAID usage in production

 

 

Zope users RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded


miles at jamkit

Jun 2, 2009, 9:56 AM

Post #1 of 2 (491 views)
Permalink
ZeoRAID usage in production

Hi,

This is mainly a question for Christian, but I'm cc'ing the list as it will
be useful knowledge to be generally available. I was looking at this
product and thinking about using it in an upcoming assignment.

>From the docs:
"Keep backups of your data. ZEORaid has good unit test coverage but hasn't
seen live action yet, so keep this in mind." - is this still the case?

Is anyone else using it at the moment at all for demanding sites? Could you
post some stats, experiences and any gotchas at all? How does ZeoRAID cope
with the blob storage? Also, what's the timeout for connecting to the zeo
storages?

Also, I read this bit in the docs:

"The RAID server itself remains the last single point of failure in the
system. This problem is solved as the RAID server does not maintain any
persistent state (except the configuration data: it's listening ip and port
and the list of storages).

The RAID server can be made reliable by providing a hot-spare server using
existing HA tools (taking over the IP when a host goes down) and the
existing ZEO ClientStorage behaviour."

Is it possible to provide a "pool" of ZeoRAID processes, each talking to the
same zeo storages, and put the list of ZeoRAID processes into the client
storage configuration so it will round-robin if one is not available?

Many thanks for your help,

Miles


chris at simplistix

Jun 7, 2009, 10:13 AM

Post #2 of 2 (412 views)
Permalink
Re: ZeoRAID usage in production [In reply to]

Miles Waller wrote:
> From the docs:
> "Keep backups of your data. ZEORaid has good unit test coverage but
> hasn't seen live action yet, so keep this in mind." - is this still the
> case?

Yep, and Christian has expressed the need for further development to
solve some bugs, although I don't have details of those bugs to hand.

> Is it possible to provide a "pool" of ZeoRAID processes, each talking to
> the same zeo storages, and put the list of ZeoRAID processes into the
> client storage configuration so it will round-robin if one is not available?

I believe this is one of the areas where there are still bugs ;-)
It's this configuration that I'd like to roll out, but it's a hard sell
to a customer to be punting a HA solution that needs further development
before it's stable.

cheers,

Chris

--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
_______________________________________________
Zope maillist - Zope[at]zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )

Zope users RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded
 
 


Interested in having your list archived? Contact lists@gossamer-threads.com
 
  Web Applications & Managed Hosting Powered by Gossamer Threads Inc.