jim at zope
Aug 20, 2012, 11:15 AM
Post #1 of 1
(113 views)
Permalink
|
|
zc.buildout in github foul
|
|
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Jim Fulton <jim [at] zope> wrote:
...
> I also committed a foul by unilaterally moving buildout development to
> github. This was originally just a fork for buildout 2, but helpers wanted
> to move 1 development there too and, well ... helpers. :)
> Anyway, the move of buildout to github wasn't a secret.
My foul was even greater than I thought. I didn't change the license
(and don't particularly want to except...) and yet I carelessly let a
non-zope-contributor become a buildout developer.
https://github.com/buildout
Honestly, I wasn't even thinking in these terms and should have been.
I probably should have truly forked buildout if I wanted to be free
from the restriction of having only zope contributors. Maybe I still
should. buildout probably shouldn't have been in the zope repo to
begin with.
It so happens that the one non-zope-contributor is planning to become a
zope contributor, we'll soon be in the state that all of the buildout
developers are contributors again.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton
http://www.linkedin.com/in/jimfulton
Jerky is better than bacon! http://zo.pe/Kqm
_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev [at] zope
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
|
