<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Zope | Dev</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>26 Nov  2009 10:17:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>split out zope.component &amp;quot;mechanics&amp;quot; into a separate package (was Re: improving the utility and adapter lookup APIs)</title>
<description>Chris McDonough wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; If some set of ZCA APIs made it the responsibility of the *caller* to invoke &amp;gt;&amp;gt; the adapter with arguments would go a long</description>
<pubDate>25 Nov  2009 14:08:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224574</link>
</item><item>
<title>improving the utility and adapter lookup APIs</title>
<description>Hi there, Reading the thread Chris McDonough started (and ended) about modifying the way utility registration works reminded me of the following th</description>
<pubDate>25 Nov  2009 07:41:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224545</link>
</item><item>
<title>z3c.schema2xml and z3c.schema2json</title>
<description>Hi, I&amp;#039;m about to work a bit on z3c.schema2json [1]. As has been briefly discussed before (a while ago [2]), z3c. schema2json is so similar to z3c.s</description>
<pubDate>25 Nov  2009 04:11:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224539</link>
</item><item>
<title>Releasing zope.browserresource</title>
<description>Could somebody please give me PyPI rights for zope.browserresource? I&amp;#039;d like to release a new version of it which includes the recent fixes to its dep</description>
<pubDate>24 Nov  2009 13:56:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224523</link>
</item><item>
<title>Zope3 server with SIGSEGV - what to do?</title>
<description>Hi, In my Zope3 (I use Zope 3.4.0) logs I just found some curious entries: ------------------------------ snip ----------------------- 2009-10-23T12:</description>
<pubDate>24 Nov  2009 13:04:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224521</link>
</item><item>
<title>Making zope.dublincore independent of zope.annotation</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;d like to see the hard dependency of zope.dublincore on zope.annotation gone. This would lift the indirect dependency on the ZODB. zope.dublincore</description>
<pubDate>24 Nov  2009 08:16:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224515</link>
</item><item>
<title>make zope.component.registry.Components inherit from dict?</title>
<description>We&amp;#039;ve been handling some constructive criticisms from repoze.bfg developers with respect to verbosity resulting from use of unnamed utility registrat</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 19:24:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224482</link>
</item><item>
<title>Handling instance specific configuration files with buildout</title>
<description>Hi, thanks to Hanno&amp;#039;s help I&amp;#039;m up and running with buildout. Having spent the  last couple of years tied to to some frozen Zope and CMF checkouts it</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2009 04:29:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224463</link>
</item><item>
<title>Setuptools / Distribute</title>
<description>Hi, I&amp;#039;m about to migrate my first Zope to project to buildout. Does it matter  whether I use setuptools or distribute? And is there any preference f</description>
<pubDate>17 Nov  2009 01:44:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224445</link>
</item><item>
<title>Contributing initgroups upstream</title>
<description>Hi, I&amp;#039;ve just contributed a patch to CPython adding os.initgroups based on this extension module:  http://svn.zope.org/Zope/trunk/src/initgroups/</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 07:07:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224432</link>
</item><item>
<title>Vote on PyPI comments</title>
<description>Hi All, Apologies for the cross post, but I&amp;#039;m not sure this has received the publicity it deserves... PyPI grew a commenting and rating system a wh</description>
<pubDate>13 Nov  2009 07:39:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224412</link>
</item><item>
<title>Zope Tests: 6 OK, 1 Unknown</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Wed Nov 11 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Thu Nov 12 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 7 messages: 1 from Carlos.</description>
<pubDate>12 Nov  2009 03:59:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224407</link>
</item><item>
<title>Automated Acceptance Test</title>
<description>You may have more luck on zope-dev (cc&amp;#039;d). :-) Stefan  On 11.11.2009, at 18:37, Carlos.Solis wrote: &amp;gt; Dear all, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I&#039;m trying to find an open</description>
<pubDate>11 Nov  2009 14:36:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224403</link>
</item><item>
<title>Zope 2.12 - one more ZPublisher event</title>
<description>Hi, In Zope 2.12 ZPublisher we have a good set of events now, which provide useful hooks for modifying the response before or after publication. Ho</description>
<pubDate>10 Nov  2009 23:53:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224400</link>
</item><item>
<title>Packing and GC versus packtime</title>
<description>Hi, I&amp;#039;m wondering: Scenario 1: I pack a storage to a time T and append X transactions after that Scenario 2: I append X transactions to a storage a</description>
<pubDate>09 Nov  2009 04:22:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224385</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: persistent product registry optional?</title>
<description>Hanno Schlichting wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Does anyone know how to correctly fix this? We could make the tear-down &amp;gt;&amp;gt; code in Five more robust, obviously, but I fear</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 13:02:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224358</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Merging the zope.component&amp;#039;s conditional support	for zope.security</title>
<description>* 2009-11-06 18:36, Thomas Lotze wrote: &amp;gt; I obviously don&amp;#039;t. The sooner, the better. I&amp;#039;m going to merge the code on Sunday, if nobody objects. Best</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 11:34:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224357</link>
</item><item>
<title>Writing output logs from zope.testing.testrunner</title>
<description>Hi, I&amp;#039;m trying to turn the results of a test run using zope.testing (zc.recipe.testrunner) into a JUnit compliant XML format so that I can graph it</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 07:12:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224347</link>
</item><item>
<title>Zope 2.12 and Five - setting of Products.meta_types</title>
<description>Hi, Something has changed in Zope 2.12 that is causing tests that use PlacelessSetup&amp;#039;s tearDown() with Five to fail: Error in test /Users/optilude</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 22:14:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224339</link>
</item><item>
<title>Merging the zope.component&amp;#039;s conditional support for zope.security</title>
<description>Hello, I&amp;#039;d like to finally merge my branch which adds conditional support for zope.security, removing the hard dependency between zope.component[zcml</description>
<pubDate>04 Nov  2009 23:58:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224333</link>
</item><item>
<title>Relative path support for z3c.recipe.paster?</title>
<description>Hi, Since zc.recipe.egg 1.2.0, there&amp;#039;s an option to generate scripts which contains relative paths to eggs installed in the eggs/ directory [1] This</description>
<pubDate>04 Nov  2009 07:34:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224324</link>
</item><item>
<title>Zope Tests: 6 OK</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Mon Nov 2 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Tue Nov 3 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Te</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 03:59:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224307</link>
</item><item>
<title>A note on the PyCon Program committee.</title>
<description>I was on the PyCon-PC this and last year. Unfortunately, I had less time this year, and the workload was higher, and the time shorter, so they were fo</description>
<pubDate>01 Nov  2009 23:37:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224292</link>
</item><item>
<title>Zope Tests: 6 OK, 2 Failed</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Fri Oct 30 13:00:00 2009 UTC to Sat Oct 31 13:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Te</description>
<pubDate>31 Oct  2009 05:59:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224281</link>
</item><item>
<title>Zope Tests: 7 OK, 1 Failed</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Thu Oct 29 13:00:00 2009 UTC to Fri Oct 30 13:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Te</description>
<pubDate>30 Oct  2009 05:59:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224275</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
