Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 04 Jul 2009 15:32:35 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hanno Schlichting wrote: > Log message for revision 101181: > Correctly handle unauthorized exception 04 Jul 2009 11:03:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222807 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Christian Theune wrote: > I took the Zope 3.4 KGS, removed the obvious packages that do not belong > t 04 Jul 2009 10:31:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222806 On Sat, 2009-07-04 at 11:25 -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Jul 4, 2009, at 6:30 AM, Christian Theune wrote: > > > It was shallow after understanding 04 Jul 2009 08:31:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222805 Hi, I took the Zope 3.4 KGS, removed the obvious packages that do not belong to the ZTK out of the list and created a home for the master list that d 04 Jul 2009 04:33:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222804 Hi, On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 10:44 -0400, Jim Fulton wrote: > Switching to zope-dev. > > On Jul 2, 2009, at 10:40 AM, Chris Withers wrote: > > > Jim F 04 Jul 2009 03:30:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222803 On 7/3/09 1:29 PM, Tres Seaver wrote: >> In general, I find deploying as zip files to be an anti-feature. In >> seems especially insane when extensio 03 Jul 2009 13:44:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222802 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jim Fulton wrote: > On Jul 2, 2009, at 8:39 PM, Tim Hoffman wrote: > >> Hi all >> >> Can I make a sugg 03 Jul 2009 10:29:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222801 Hi Tobias Cool Just something to note google recently upped the file limit to 3000 so don't be too agressive generating those zips ;-) T > > Great 03 Jul 2009 06:21:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222800 On 03.07.2009, at 12:33, Jim Fulton wrote: > On Jul 3, 2009, at 6:25 AM, Tim Hoffman wrote: > >> Hi Jim >> >> That is what I am doing now, the proble 03 Jul 2009 05:08:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222798 On Jul 3, 2009, at 6:25 AM, Tim Hoffman wrote: > Hi Jim > > That is what I am doing now, the problem I see though is when someone > upates (via build 03 Jul 2009 03:33:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222797 Hi Jim That is what I am doing now, the problem I see though is when someone upates (via buildout etc.... a) module they need to remember to remove 03 Jul 2009 03:25:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222796 On Jul 2, 2009, at 8:39 PM, Tim Hoffman wrote: > Hi all > > Can I make a suggestion that would make a couple of modules more gae > friendly ;-) > zop 03 Jul 2009 03:04:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222795 Tobias Rodäbel wrote: > Sorry, I don't agree. We assume an imp.load_dynamic function from what > we read in the python documentation. But the implem 03 Jul 2009 02:09:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222794 On 03.07.2009, at 10:38, Chris Withers wrote: > Tim Hoffman wrote: >> gae/1.333250465889549129/zope/i18nmessageid/ >> _zope_i18nmessageid_message.py 03 Jul 2009 02:05:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222793 I suppose that depends on your point of view. They exception is actually saying that imp.load_dynamic is not implemented, not that it can't load the 03 Jul 2009 02:05:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222792 Tim Hoffman wrote: > gae/1.333250465889549129/zope/i18nmessageid/_zope_i18nmessageid_message.py", > line 6, in __bootstrap__ > imp.load_dynamic(__ 03 Jul 2009 01:38:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222791 Hi, yes, I'd really appreciate such a modification. Then I could delete the regarding code in my rod.recipe.appengine, which provides a dummy imp 03 Jul 2009 01:33:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222790 Hi all Can I make a suggestion that would make a couple of modules more gae friendly ;-) zope.interface and zope.i18nmessageid have 'c' optimisations 02 Jul 2009 17:39:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222789 On 02.07.09 19:41, Jonas Meurer wrote: > On 02/07/2009 Andreas Jung wrote: > >>> On 02/07/2009 Andreas Jung wrote: >>> >>>>> Compiling /usr/ 02 Jul 2009 10:47:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222787 On 02/07/2009 Andreas Jung wrote: > > On 02/07/2009 Andreas Jung wrote: > >>> Compiling /usr/lib/zope2.11/lib/python/mechanize/_firefox3cookiejar.py . 02 Jul 2009 10:41:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222786 On 02.07.09 19:23, Jonas Meurer wrote: > Hello again, > > first, thanks for the fast response. > > On 02/07/2009 Andreas Jung wrote: > >>> Compilin 02 Jul 2009 10:37:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222785 Hello again, first, thanks for the fast response. On 02/07/2009 Andreas Jung wrote: > > Compiling /usr/lib/zope2.11/lib/python/mechanize/_firefox3co 02 Jul 2009 10:23:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222784 On Jul 2, 2009, at 12:11 PM, Hanno Schlichting wrote: > On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Jim Fulton<jim@zope.com> wrote: >> >> On Jul 2, 2009, at 7:58 02 Jul 2009 10:12:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222783 On 02.07.09 18:32, Jonas Meurer wrote: > Hello, > > at preparing zope2.11.3 for debian, i came across several byte-compiling > errors. > > three of th 02 Jul 2009 09:39:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222782 Hello, at preparing zope2.11.3 for debian, i came across several byte-compiling errors. three of them are due to the new tests for python2.5 and pyt 02 Jul 2009 09:32:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222781