Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 24 Nov 2009 03:58:38 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg Hanno Schlichting wrote: > > I'm not sure how this affects Chris proposal. But we already have a > commonly used subclass of the component registry t 24 Nov 2009 01:04:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224503 On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 5:53 AM, Matthew Wilkes <matthew@matthewwilkes.co.uk> wrote: > But, here is where the ZCA eyes come back into play, I wouldn't 24 Nov 2009 00:25:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224502 On 2009-11-24 05:57, Martin Aspeli wrote: > I whole-heartedly agree, and I think it's important that we use the > momentum behind BFG (and other consu 24 Nov 2009 00:12:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224501 Martin Aspeli wrote: >> Could maybe we instead just do: >> >> class Components(object): >> def __init__(self, name='', bases=()): >> 23 Nov 2009 23:39:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224500 Chris McDonough wrote: > OK after rereading this, I think we may be massively overthinking this. The > above is getting kinda silly. I can't think 23 Nov 2009 23:07:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224499 Chris McDonough wrote: > Thanks. Yup. I would be +1 on this if the registry itself implemented > IDictInterface. > > If that was untenable, if all 23 Nov 2009 22:39:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224498 Martin Aspeli wrote: >> Meh, I just remembered that I tried this. The current implementation requires >> that the "name" value be a literal string o 23 Nov 2009 22:24:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224497 Matthew Wilkes wrote: > > On 2009-11-24, at 0521, Chris McDonough wrote: > >> I don't think I understand. Could you provide an example? > > Sure! 23 Nov 2009 22:22:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224496 Martin Aspeli wrote: > Hi Chris, > > Chris McDonough wrote: >> Martin Aspeli wrote: >>> We need to make sure that we're not inventing a different way 23 Nov 2009 22:11:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224495 On 2009-11-24, at 0521, Chris McDonough wrote: > I don't think I understand. Could you provide an example? Sure! I think this is the same thing th 23 Nov 2009 21:59:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224493 Chris McDonough wrote: > Chris McDonough wrote: >>> Off the top of my head, another way to think of this *might* be to say >>> that the 'dict access' 23 Nov 2009 21:54:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224494 Hi Chris, Chris McDonough wrote: > Martin Aspeli wrote: >> We need to make sure that we're not inventing a different way to achieve >> something whi 23 Nov 2009 21:54:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224492 Chris McDonough wrote: > >> Off the top of my head, another way to think of this *might* be to say >> that the 'dict access' is basically looking up 23 Nov 2009 21:42:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224491 Martin Aspeli wrote: > We need to make sure that we're not inventing a different way to achieve > something which is already possible. This will lead 23 Nov 2009 21:40:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224490 Chris McDonough wrote: >> A lookup keyed entirely on strings and not interfaces is perfectly >> possible using the ZCA, just register your utility t 23 Nov 2009 21:31:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224489 Matthew Wilkes wrote: >> In a system like this, there are no interfaces; the string >> 'root_factory' performs the same job as the IRootFactory inter 23 Nov 2009 21:21:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224488 Matthew Wilkes wrote: > Right, but I think mixing the two is just going to be confusing. Your > alternative spelling may well be useful, but only 23 Nov 2009 21:10:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224487 Hi Chris, >>> In repoze.bfg, we've actually decided to use a subclass of the component >>> registry which also inherits from "dict". This makes it p 23 Nov 2009 20:57:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224486 > You may have Zope Component Developer's Eyes, a common disease in > these parts. ;-) The goggles, they do nothing. > Under the hood, the system 23 Nov 2009 20:53:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224485 Matthew Wilkes wrote: > Hi Chris, > > On 2009-11-24, at 0324, Chris McDonough wrote: > >> In repoze.bfg, we've actually decided to use a subclass of 23 Nov 2009 20:03:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224484 Hi Chris, On 2009-11-24, at 0324, Chris McDonough wrote: > In repoze.bfg, we've actually decided to use a subclass of the > component > registry w 23 Nov 2009 19:41:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224483 We've been handling some constructive criticisms from repoze.bfg developers with respect to verbosity resulting from use of unnamed utility registrat 23 Nov 2009 19:24:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224482 Hi there, On 11/23/2009 10:27 AM, Jonathan Ballet wrote: > Hello, > > On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Jonathan Ballet > <jonathan.ballet@securactive 23 Nov 2009 11:04:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224481 Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Sun Nov 22 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Mon Nov 23 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Te 23 Nov 2009 03:59:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224480 Hello, On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Jonathan Ballet <jonathan.ballet@securactive.net> wrote: > Hello Christian, > > On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 11:07 23 Nov 2009 01:27:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224478