<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Zope | Dev</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>04 Jul  2009 13:53:53 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>Re: SVN: Zope/branches/2.12/ Correctly handle unauthorized exceptions in the ZPublisherExceptionHook.</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hanno Schlichting wrote: &amp;gt; Log message for revision 101181: &amp;gt;  Correctly handle unauthorized exception</description>
<pubDate>04 Jul  2009 11:03:16 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222807</link>
</item><item>
<title>List of packages in ZTK</title>
<description>Hi, I took the Zope 3.4 KGS, removed the obvious packages that do not belong to the ZTK out of the list and created a home for the master list that d</description>
<pubDate>04 Jul  2009 04:33:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222804</link>
</item><item>
<title>A suggestion for changing exception handler when loading &amp;#039;c&amp;#039; optimisations to make modules more friendly for GAE</title>
<description>Hi all Can I make a suggestion that would make a couple of modules more gae friendly ;-) zope.interface and zope.i18nmessageid have &amp;#039;c&amp;#039; optimisations</description>
<pubDate>02 Jul  2009 17:39:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222789</link>
</item><item>
<title>issues with building zope2.11.3</title>
<description>Hello, at preparing zope2.11.3 for debian, i came across several byte-compiling errors. three of them are due to the new tests for python2.5 and pyt</description>
<pubDate>02 Jul  2009 09:32:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222781</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Distutils] Where is the setuptools source repository?</title>
<description>Switching to zope-dev. On Jul 2, 2009, at 10:40 AM, Chris Withers wrote: &amp;gt; Jim Fulton wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; buildout works fine. The problem is the zope.testing</description>
<pubDate>02 Jul  2009 07:44:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222778</link>
</item><item>
<title>FYI: svn.zope.org change for svn:// protocol service</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, This is a heads-up that affects anyone accessing the SVN repositories  using the svn:// proto</description>
<pubDate>02 Jul  2009 07:16:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222776</link>
</item><item>
<title>zope.testing 3.7.7</title>
<description>I just released zope.testing 3.7.7. It only contains a single change: installing the test runner callable via a console_script entry point to allow s</description>
<pubDate>02 Jul  2009 06:55:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222773</link>
</item><item>
<title>Some thoughts on KGS</title>
<description>I think the KGS should define 3 categories of packages: - ZTK packages   These are packages we maintain and expect people to build things on. - Te</description>
<pubDate>02 Jul  2009 04:19:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222770</link>
</item><item>
<title>zope.app.module, zope.app.interface and zodb in KGS?</title>
<description>zope.app.module provides support for persistemt modules.  zope.app.interface provides support for persistent interfaces. Both  rely on a highly expe</description>
<pubDate>02 Jul  2009 03:30:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222769</link>
</item><item>
<title>zope.interface 3.5.2 release</title>
<description>I just released zope.interface 3.5.2, which adds only this bug fix: - BaseAdapterRegistry.unregister, unsubscribe: Remove empty portions of  the dat</description>
<pubDate>01 Jul  2009 09:01:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222762</link>
</item><item>
<title>lxml is hard to install (was Re: How to test changes to ZTK packages?)</title>
<description>On Jun 30, 2009, at 2:35 PM, Tres Seaver wrote: &amp;gt; -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- &amp;gt; Hash: SHA1 &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Tim Hoffman wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; I have to chime in here t</description>
<pubDate>30 Jun  2009 13:35:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222745</link>
</item><item>
<title>Making PersistentList satisfy zope.schema.List</title>
<description>I noticed that PersistentList and PersistentDict do not satisfy zope.schema.List or zope.schema.Dict, which is rather annoying. For example: class I</description>
<pubDate>30 Jun  2009 12:17:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222744</link>
</item><item>
<title>How to test changes to ZTK packages?</title>
<description>I should know this, but I don&amp;#039;t. What is the recommended way to test  changes to core ZTK packages to mitigate the risk that changes affect  other</description>
<pubDate>30 Jun  2009 03:28:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222732</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: SVN: zope.dublincore/trunk/setup.py Add &amp;#039;zope.app.component&amp;#039; to the &amp;#039;test&amp;#039; extra in the setup.py so that the</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Aaron Lehmann wrote: &amp;gt; Log message for revision 101312: &amp;gt;  Add &amp;#039;zope.app.component&amp;#039; to the &amp;#039;test&amp;#039; extr</description>
<pubDate>29 Jun  2009 13:18:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222731</link>
</item><item>
<title>ZCatalog and indexes cleanup</title>
<description>Hi!  I did plan to work on a small catalog improvement, but after looking at the code I&amp;#039;d like to do some cleanup first:  1.) remove the deprecated</description>
<pubDate>29 Jun  2009 03:48:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222723</link>
</item><item>
<title>Z3 event on system shutdown</title>
<description>Do we have a Z3 event being fired during the app-server shutdown phase (comparable to IProcessingEvent)? Andreas</description>
<pubDate>28 Jun  2009 01:06:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222711</link>
</item><item>
<title>Schema to JSON</title>
<description>Hi, I&amp;#039;m about to embark on a module to serialize Zope schemas into the JSON format for my application, taking inspiration from z3c.schema2xml. I&amp;#039;ve h</description>
<pubDate>27 Jun  2009 11:23:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222708</link>
</item><item>
<title>A couple of questions about (maybe) missing dependencies</title>
<description>Hello, While analyzing the dependency graph of one of our applications, I found some missing dependencies. I&amp;#039;m not sure these are bugs, but I&amp;#039;d like</description>
<pubDate>27 Jun  2009 00:47:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222703</link>
</item><item>
<title>zope.proxy</title>
<description>Hi, Is there any documentation on zope.proxy other than the test? I don&amp;#039;t speak C anymore. :) Basically, I&amp;#039;m curious if it would be possible to imp</description>
<pubDate>26 Jun  2009 03:30:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222690</link>
</item><item>
<title>zope.sendmail dependencies</title>
<description>Hello, it looks like zope.sendmail should depend on transaction (because that&amp;#039;s what it is using, importing it) and not on the full ZODB3. Am I miss</description>
<pubDate>25 Jun  2009 23:36:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222687</link>
</item><item>
<title>new zope.18nmessageid release</title>
<description>Would anyone mind if I made a new release of zope.18nmessageid? It would probably be version 3.5.0. The last release was in 2007, and the trunk cod</description>
<pubDate>25 Jun  2009 23:15:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222686</link>
</item><item>
<title>zope.testbrowser without the http requests</title>
<description>Hi All, I&amp;#039;m doing some functional testing of controllers in a Pylons project and I&amp;#039;m wondering if zope.testbrowser can be used for just analysing ht</description>
<pubDate>24 Jun  2009 12:05:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222668</link>
</item><item>
<title>zc.async: cron replacement?</title>
<description>Hi all, In messages like http://www.mail-archive.com/zope3-dev@zope.org/msg05964.html, zc.async is mentioned as the solution for cron-like functional</description>
<pubDate>24 Jun  2009 10:19:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222659</link>
</item><item>
<title>z3c.saconfig engine creation configuration</title>
<description>On MySQL, it&amp;#039;s necessary to supply to ``pool_recycle`` parameter on engine creation, else the connection dies after some timeout and the pool is una</description>
<pubDate>24 Jun  2009 06:42:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222657</link>
</item><item>
<title>Manuel Beta</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;ve just released the first beta of Manuel, my next-generation doctest project. Being that zope-dev has some of the most well-informed users of doct</description>
<pubDate>24 Jun  2009 06:00:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222656</link>
</item><item>
<title>fail loading persistentregistry</title>
<description>Hello, Within zope2 (2.10.6) I can&amp;#039;t load the pickle containing the persistentregistry any more because I removed a product that has persistent adatp</description>
<pubDate>24 Jun  2009 05:14:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222655</link>
</item><item>
<title>2.5/2.6 support in Zope (Re: The future of Zope{2, 3} and Plone in Debian and Ubuntu)</title>
<description>On Jun 23, 2009, at 4:20 PM, Tres Seaver wrote: &amp;gt; -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- &amp;gt; Hash: SHA1 &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Fabio Tranchitella wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Zope 2 and Plone</description>
<pubDate>24 Jun  2009 02:39:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222648</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: The future of Zope{2, 3} and Plone in Debian and Ubuntu</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Fabio Tranchitella wrote: &amp;gt; Zope 2 and Plone &amp;gt; ================ &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Zope 2 and Plone are obviously re</description>
<pubDate>23 Jun  2009 13:20:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222641</link>
</item><item>
<title>Zope Tests: No messages</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Mon Jun 22 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Tue Jun 23 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were no messages. ____________</description>
<pubDate>23 Jun  2009 05:00:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222633</link>
</item><item>
<title>hurry.workflow class based work flows.</title>
<description>Hello, I have been working with hurry.workflow in a project and had some questions about making hurry.workflow work with different work flows. For</description>
<pubDate>22 Jun  2009 23:28:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222630</link>
</item><item>
<title>repoze.component and repoze.configuration</title>
<description>I have released two new packages to PyPI. These packages were inspired by (design almost entirely stolen from) zope.component and zope.configuration</description>
<pubDate>22 Jun  2009 12:54:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222627</link>
</item><item>
<title>tabs in the source</title>
<description>Hello, Maybe it&amp;#039;s time for an svn commit police squad? 22 .py files have tabs... and I grepped only zope.* packages. -- Best regards, Adam GROSZER</description>
<pubDate>22 Jun  2009 10:16:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222622</link>
</item><item>
<title>Zope Tests: 7 OK, 1 Failed</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Sun Jun 21 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Mon Jun 22 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Te</description>
<pubDate>22 Jun  2009 05:00:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222613</link>
</item><item>
<title>RFC: ZTK custom publications, zope.app.publication, and zope.traversing</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;m trying to make the Zope Toolkit (ZTK) publisher/publication  framework a little easier to deal with. I think zope.app.publication  mostly provi</description>
<pubDate>21 Jun  2009 08:55:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222599</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Checkins] SVN: zope.traversing/trunk/src/zope/traversing/ Moved the publicationtraverse module from zope.app.publication and added tests.</title>
<description>Why? traverseName is part of zope.app.publication&amp;#039;s implementation.  Now it&amp;#039;s oddly split off in a very separate package. This makes  customizing</description>
<pubDate>20 Jun  2009 10:10:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222589</link>
</item><item>
<title>[action required] Zope Contributor Agreement change</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, This is a last reminder for those current contributors to the Zope  software repositories on</description>
<pubDate>19 Jun  2009 05:25:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222574</link>
</item><item>
<title>zope.testing: Define __add__ for RENormalizing</title>
<description>Hi, I suggest defining __add__ for zope.testing.renormalizing.RENormalizing which would return a new Checker with the transformers combined. This a</description>
<pubDate>18 Jun  2009 01:00:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222553</link>
</item><item>
<title>Hg mirror available</title>
<description>This is a first attempt to build an Mercurial mirror : http://hg.zope.mirrors.securactive.org/ - Size SVN 2.13go Hg 780mo Hg (only trunk for each pac</description>
<pubDate>17 Jun  2009 16:34:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222552</link>
</item><item>
<title>zope.testbrowser behavour on HTTPError</title>
<description>Hello, I noticed that if a click or some action causes an HTTPError in a Browser, the old page content stays in .contents. Exception comes at self.br</description>
<pubDate>17 Jun  2009 01:42:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222536</link>
</item><item>
<title>REQUEST vs. request</title>
<description>Hello, I am a bit confused about self.request and self.REQUEST. Can anybody point me to an explanation of the different tasks that both have? Googlin</description>
<pubDate>16 Jun  2009 13:35:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222532</link>
</item><item>
<title>Zope 3.4.1 release?</title>
<description>Hi, any chance to see a new release (KGS) ? Some packages are old : - docutils - zope.testing - z3c.etestbrowser I can help on this task. -- Sebast</description>
<pubDate>16 Jun  2009 06:59:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222526</link>
</item><item>
<title>buildbots</title>
<description>Hello, from various clippings of this list and the ZTK docs at &amp;lt;http://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit/process/tools.html&amp;gt; I&amp;#039;ve gathered that there are (at</description>
<pubDate>15 Jun  2009 23:00:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222516</link>
</item><item>
<title>git / Hg mirror of Zope SVN?</title>
<description>Oops, wrong ML :).  ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Sebastien Douche &amp;lt;sdouche@gmail.com&amp;gt; Date: Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 18:04 Subject: git</description>
<pubDate>15 Jun  2009 11:05:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222513</link>
</item><item>
<title>Exposing a zope-testrunner binary in zope.testing</title>
<description>Hi, Any objections to me adding this line to zope.testing&amp;#039;s setup.py:   entry_points = {&amp;#039;console_scripts&amp;#039;: [&amp;#039;zope-testrunner = zope.testing.testru</description>
<pubDate>14 Jun  2009 23:53:55 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222509</link>
</item><item>
<title>z3c.form 2.0.0 released!</title>
<description>Hello everyone, on behalf of the `z3c.form` developers, I am proud to announce the next major released of `z3c.form` 2.0.0. `z3c.form` form is a flex</description>
<pubDate>13 Jun  2009 20:46:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222506</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [ZODB-Dev] Removing the unused and untested ZODB.Mount module</title>
<description>On Jun 11, 2009, at 2:19 PM, Tres Seaver wrote: &amp;gt; -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- &amp;gt; Hash: SHA1 &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Jim Fulton wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; It looking for the ZODBMou</description>
<pubDate>11 Jun  2009 11:21:49 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222485</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Removing the unused and untested ZODB.Mount module</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jim Fulton wrote: &amp;gt; It looking for the ZODBMountPoint object that Tarek refered to, I saw  &amp;gt; that ther</description>
<pubDate>11 Jun  2009 11:19:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222486</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: SVN: Zope/branches/2.10/ backport r94905 to 2.10: Acquisition wrappers now correctly proxy `__iter__`.</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Andreas Zeidler wrote: &amp;gt; Log message for revision 94907: &amp;gt;  backport r94905 to 2.10: Acquisition wrapp</description>
<pubDate>11 Jun  2009 11:10:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222484</link>
</item><item>
<title>Bug tracking</title>
<description>Hello, I&amp;#039;m trying to understand how we are using the bug tracker. I noticed that on Launchpad right now there are both umbrella projects such as &amp;quot;Zo</description>
<pubDate>10 Jun  2009 23:57:22 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222472</link>
</item><item>
<title>Zope sprinting at EP</title>
<description>Hi there, I see we have a grok sprint working towards grok 1.0 at the EP. I&amp;#039;d like to spend my sprinting time on ZTK issues which currently include:</description>
<pubDate>10 Jun  2009 23:51:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222471</link>
</item><item>
<title>Zope2 / Zope3 catalog index fork / divergence</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Christian Theune wrote: &amp;gt; On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 20:07 -0400, Tres Seaver wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; -----BEGIN PGP SIGNE</description>
<pubDate>10 Jun  2009 09:10:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222465</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: SVN: zope.index/trunk/ - Port okascore.c optimization used in okapiiindex from Zope2 catalog</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Chris McDonough wrote: &amp;gt; Log message for revision 100775: &amp;gt;  - Port okascore.c optimization used in ok</description>
<pubDate>09 Jun  2009 17:07:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222457</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Checkins] SVN: zope.app.publisher/trunk/ To make browsers update their caches of resources immediately when the</title>
<description>On Tuesday 09 June 2009, Wolfgang Schnerring wrote: &amp;gt;   To make browsers update their caches of resources immediately when the &amp;gt;   resource changes, t</description>
<pubDate>09 Jun  2009 06:51:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222450</link>
</item><item>
<title>Who uses request.getPositionalArguments()?</title>
<description>Hello, I&amp;#039;ve stumbled over this by accident, but it seems that getPositionalArguments() in zope.publisher.base.BaseRequest always returns an empty val</description>
<pubDate>09 Jun  2009 06:45:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222449</link>
</item><item>
<title>ZODB moved class upgrade script Was: zope.testrunner import location notifications</title>
<description>Hi, On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 12:42 +0200, Martijn Faassen wrote: &amp;gt; Hi there, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; (in particular Christian Theune) &amp;gt; &amp;gt; What&amp;#039;s the status of the &amp;#039;import</description>
<pubDate>08 Jun  2009 00:49:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222443</link>
</item><item>
<title>Odd header-handling behavior of zope.publisher.http.HTTPRequest</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;ll start by saying this is my fault. :( The HTTPRequest.getHeader method will return any environment variable,  not just headers. I expect this w</description>
<pubDate>06 Jun  2009 10:06:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222431</link>
</item><item>
<title>release zope.testing?</title>
<description>Hello, I&amp;#039;ve recently fixed two bugs in zope.testing that I find annoying on an almost daily basis (commandline option -1 doesn&amp;#039;t work and readline is</description>
<pubDate>05 Jun  2009 08:04:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222424</link>
</item><item>
<title>HA storage for zope</title>
<description>Hi, I&amp;#039;m looking at a HA setup for a project, and was wondering what the current best way forward would be. There seem to be a few potential options</description>
<pubDate>02 Jun  2009 16:04:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222388</link>
</item><item>
<title>zope.formlib does not correctly validate invariants with fields from a base interface</title>
<description>Hi, I&amp;#039;d like to fix the following bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope2/+bug/382717 Example:  &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; import zope.interface &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; import zope.schema  &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>02 Jun  2009 05:05:16 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222381</link>
</item><item>
<title>plone.reload was: Re: refactoring site functionality</title>
<description>Stephan Richter wrote: &amp;gt; On Thursday 28 May 2009, Roger Ineichen wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; btw, you are pointing to a good direction. Didn&amp;#039;t we talk &amp;gt;&amp;gt; about reload g</description>
<pubDate>01 Jun  2009 10:40:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222372</link>
</item><item>
<title>refactoring site functionality</title>
<description>Hey, Jim Fulton wrote: &amp;gt; 2. I think local configuration address use cases that most people  &amp;gt; don&amp;#039;t have but introduce complexity that I bet a lot o</description>
<pubDate>28 May  2009 08:00:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222348</link>
</item><item>
<title>Zope Tests: 7 OK, 1 Failed</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Wed May 27 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Thu May 28 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Te</description>
<pubDate>28 May  2009 05:00:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222327</link>
</item><item>
<title>RFC: Site -&amp;gt; Locus</title>
<description>Hi there, We have a concept of &amp;quot;Site&amp;quot; in the Zope Toolkit, along with SiteManager and the like. What this concept allows us to do is locally registe</description>
<pubDate>28 May  2009 04:08:55 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222323</link>
</item><item>
<title>Zope Tests: 2 OK</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Tue May 26 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Wed May 27 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 2 messages: 2 from Zope Te</description>
<pubDate>27 May  2009 05:00:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222308</link>
</item><item>
<title>Zsql and oracle CLOB column</title>
<description>Dear list, While inserting data into one of the oracle table&amp;#039;s CLOB column using zsql via python script, we observed that zope process (running in d</description>
<pubDate>27 May  2009 03:28:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222305</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Interface-dev] zope.interface 3.5.1 bdist_rpm problem</title>
<description>Thanks. Sorry this didn&amp;#039;t make it in. I&amp;#039;ve added this to my to-do  list. :) Jim On May 26, 2009, at 5:52 PM, Armen Babikyan wrote: &amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I or</description>
<pubDate>26 May  2009 14:58:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222300</link>
</item><item>
<title>Zope 2.12.0 beta 2 released</title>
<description>I just released Zope 2.12.0 beta 2 http://pypi.python.org/pypi/Zope2/2.12.0b2 and created the the official 2.12 release branch: http://svn.zope.org</description>
<pubDate>26 May  2009 10:06:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222296</link>
</item><item>
<title>Test failure in zope.traversing 3.7.0</title>
<description>I get the following failure while running the Zope 2.12 tests: ajung@suxmac2:~/sandboxes/Zope-2.12/2.12 bin/alltests       Test-module import</description>
<pubDate>26 May  2009 07:40:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222292</link>
</item><item>
<title>Zope Tests: 5 OK, 3 Unknown</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Mon May 25 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Tue May 26 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Te</description>
<pubDate>26 May  2009 05:00:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222290</link>
</item><item>
<title>zope.testrunner import location notifications</title>
<description>Hi there, (in particular Christian Theune) What&amp;#039;s the status of the &amp;#039;import location&amp;#039; notification functionality in zope.testrunner? What&amp;#039;s the st</description>
<pubDate>26 May  2009 03:42:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222287</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: SVN: zope.app.pagetemplate/tags/3.7.0/src/zope/app/pagetemplate/tests/test_simpleviewclass.py Coverage.</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Stephan Richter wrote: &amp;gt; On Monday 25 May 2009, Tres Seaver wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Log message for revision 100382:</description>
<pubDate>25 May  2009 18:54:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222272</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Checkins] SVN: zope.app.http/trunk/ - Replaced the dependency on zope.deprecation with BBB imports</title>
<description>On Monday 25 May 2009, Shane Hathaway wrote: &amp;gt; +- Replaced the dependency on zope.deprecation with BBB imports As a general question, how will people</description>
<pubDate>25 May  2009 17:33:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222267</link>
</item><item>
<title>RFC: zope.app.pagetemplate.engine dependencies</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Resolution #1 ============= Whereas: - - The &amp;#039;zope.app.pagetemplate.engine&amp;#039; module pulls in nothing f</description>
<pubDate>25 May  2009 09:37:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222258</link>
</item><item>
<title>How to include a &amp;lt;style media=&amp;quot;print&amp;quot;....&amp;gt; CSS file?</title>
<description>Hi, I&amp;#039;m currently to make my application printer-friendly, thus I&amp;#039;d like to include a print-CSS file. Currently, I include CSS-files like that: ----</description>
<pubDate>25 May  2009 06:48:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222254</link>
</item><item>
<title>Zope Tests: 5 OK, 3 Failed</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Sun May 24 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Mon May 25 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Te</description>
<pubDate>25 May  2009 05:00:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222253</link>
</item><item>
<title>[action required] Zope Contributor Agreement change</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, Please exclude the mass-email, most of you will receive this more than  once, we&amp;#039;re hoping to</description>
<pubDate>24 May  2009 05:18:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222240</link>
</item><item>
<title>zc.buildout problem</title>
<description>Hello, Following just happened. The project has KGS 3.4 versions as a base, locally I wanted to override lxml to &amp;gt;= 2.1.1. [...snip...] extends = ht</description>
<pubDate>24 May  2009 02:15:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222232</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Checkins] SVN: z3c.form/trunk/ merged branch icemac_validate_NOT_CHANGED</title>
<description>Hello Michael, After some simple thinking there are some fears that this wrecks other basic fields validation. Something like the field is required,</description>
<pubDate>24 May  2009 01:46:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222231</link>
</item><item>
<title>Another OFS.Traversable and ZPublisher inconsistency</title>
<description>Hi, So, we determined that OFS.Traversable&amp;#039;s unrestrictedTraverse() shouldn&amp;#039;t grow support for IPublishTraverse, which is fair enough. We&amp;#039;re now us</description>
<pubDate>22 May  2009 22:00:22 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222217</link>
</item><item>
<title>zope.mimetype 1.1.2 release</title>
<description>I just released a new version of zope.mimetype. This version no longer depends on zope.app.component directly. -- Alex Smith Software Engineer Zope</description>
<pubDate>22 May  2009 14:31:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222215</link>
</item><item>
<title>package dependency refactoring progress report</title>
<description>Hi there, This is a progress report on the package dependency refactoring work. We&amp;#039;ve had a lot of people contribute to this process (thanks everyb</description>
<pubDate>22 May  2009 10:11:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222213</link>
</item><item>
<title>zope.app.publisher 3.7.0 release</title>
<description>I just released a new version of zope.app.publisher. The changes in this version are largely related to reducing dependencies on zope.app.component a</description>
<pubDate>22 May  2009 08:35:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222208</link>
</item><item>
<title>zope.app.component 3.8.2 release</title>
<description>I released a new version of zope.app.component to fix a bug introduced in the recently deprecation of its metadirectives. Packages that were broken b</description>
<pubDate>22 May  2009 08:32:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222207</link>
</item><item>
<title>zope.app.component is now deprecated</title>
<description>Hi there, I&amp;#039;ve factored more bits out of zope.app.component; the last bits could go into zope.component. zope.app.component is now deprecated. I&amp;#039;ve</description>
<pubDate>21 May  2009 06:47:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222202</link>
</item><item>
<title>Availability of windows binaries for zope.container on Python 2.5</title>
<description>Hi List, Just trying to install Grok, and as seems to be the tradition, some package updates have resulted in requiring a Visual Studio compiler to b</description>
<pubDate>20 May  2009 11:16:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222190</link>
</item><item>
<title>(REMINDER) Updated e-mail addresses due this week</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 (Please forgive the crosspost, and follow up to me directly with questions, rather than CC&amp;#039;ing the list</description>
<pubDate>20 May  2009 07:34:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222186</link>
</item><item>
<title>ComponentLookupError</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;m getting this traceback: ====================================================================================== serving on http://127.0.0.1:8080 20</description>
<pubDate>19 May  2009 07:53:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222167</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: SVN: Products.GenericSetup/trunk/Products/GenericSetup/browser/addWithPresettings.pt - don&amp;#039;t rely on manage_page_header, manage_form_title and manage_page_footer (in Zope 2.12 they can&amp;#039;t be acquired)</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Yvo Schubbe wrote: &amp;gt; Log message for revision 100073: &amp;gt;  - don&amp;#039;t rely on manage_page_header, manage_fo</description>
<pubDate>18 May  2009 09:19:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222152</link>
</item><item>
<title>Zope Tests: 6 OK</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Sun May 17 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Mon May 18 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Te</description>
<pubDate>18 May  2009 05:00:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222149</link>
</item><item>
<title>please release zc.buildout</title>
<description>Hello zope-dev,  Would someone please release a new egg,  &amp;quot;close_fds is not supported on Windows platforms&amp;quot; is blocking... -- Best regards, Adam</description>
<pubDate>18 May  2009 02:05:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222145</link>
</item><item>
<title>z3c.form 2.0 release?</title>
<description>Hi, what is still to be done for the z3c.form 2.0 release? Something I can help? Yours sincerely, -- Michael Howitz · mh@gocept.com · software deve</description>
<pubDate>17 May  2009 06:43:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222135</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Fwd: [Bug 376907] Re: AttributeError: &amp;#039;str&amp;#039; object has no attribute &amp;#039;registerSynch&amp;#039;]</title>
<description>This is a bug I filed against ZODB3.9.0b1 As you can see Jim says it is a bug in zope.app.publication but there is no Launchpad project to forward the</description>
<pubDate>15 May  2009 06:24:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222104</link>
</item><item>
<title>z3c.recipe.i18n tests break on unix</title>
<description>Hi, the tests of z3c.reipce.i18n break on unix systems, for instance with: Failed example:   ls(&amp;#039;bin&amp;#039;) Expected:   - buildout-script.py   -</description>
<pubDate>15 May  2009 02:40:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222083</link>
</item><item>
<title>movedaddedremoved branches of zope.container and zope.lifecycleevent</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;ve created two codependent branches of zope.container and zope.lifecyclevent: http://svn.zope.org/zope.container/branches/movedaddedremoved/ http:</description>
<pubDate>15 May  2009 01:26:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222080</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Checkins] SVN: zope.intid/trunk/ - Remove a dependency on ``zope.container.contained.Contained``</title>
<description>Am 15.05.2009 um 05:32 schrieb Chris McDonough: &amp;gt; Log message for revision 99961: &amp;gt; - Remove a dependency on ``zope.container.contained.Contained``</description>
<pubDate>14 May  2009 23:46:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222077</link>
</item><item>
<title>zope.* package dependencies report</title>
<description>FWIW, this may not be useful to some, but here&amp;#039;s a (not-very-detailed) report on all the zope.* packages in Zope&amp;#039;s SVN and the number of transitive d</description>
<pubDate>14 May  2009 20:16:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222075</link>
</item><item>
<title>zope.container analysis</title>
<description>zope.container (32 transitive dependencies) has some possibly low-hanging dependency tease-apart fruit. Does anyone have any ideas about to sort ou</description>
<pubDate>14 May  2009 20:05:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222074</link>
</item><item>
<title>Why does restrictedTraverse() in Zope 2 not respect IPublishTraverse adapters?</title>
<description>Hi, There&amp;#039;s currently a funny inconsistency in Zope&amp;#039;s Traversable class. If you have a URL like http://localhost:8080/path/to/@@aview/foo, and @@av</description>
<pubDate>14 May  2009 08:14:55 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222066</link>
</item><item>
<title>zope.app.publication dependencies (volunteers needed!)</title>
<description>Hi there, zope.app.publisher is depended on by quite a bit of code that uses the Zope Toolkit, as it defines brower:view and browser:resource and t</description>
<pubDate>13 May  2009 10:55:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222047</link>
</item><item>
<title>reusability markers in our documentation</title>
<description>Hi there, In the &amp;quot;ZTK futures&amp;quot; thread Chris McDonough pointed out that right now we don&amp;#039;t signal which packages are easily reusable outside of the Z</description>
<pubDate>13 May  2009 10:36:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222046</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
