Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 08 Nov 2009 20:08:01 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg Hello, * 2009-11-06 20:34, Fabio Tranchitella wrote: > I'm going to merge the code on Sunday, if nobody objects. I merged the branch back to zope.co 08 Nov 2009 04:35:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224379 Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Sat Nov 7 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Sun Nov 8 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Te 08 Nov 2009 03:59:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224376 Martin Aspeli wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to turn the results of a test run using zope.testing > (zc.recipe.testrunner) into a JUnit compliant XML f 07 Nov 2009 08:46:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224370 Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Fri Nov 6 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Sat Nov 7 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Te 07 Nov 2009 03:59:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224369 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Chris Withers wrote: > Hanno Schlichting wrote: >>> Does anyone know how to correctly fix this? We coul 06 Nov 2009 13:31:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224360 On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 10:02 PM, Chris Withers <chris@simplistix.co.uk> wrote: > Hanno Schlichting wrote: >> Maybe my work >> in making the persistent 06 Nov 2009 13:12:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224359 Hanno Schlichting wrote: >> Does anyone know how to correctly fix this? We could make the tear-down >> code in Five more robust, obviously, but I fear 06 Nov 2009 13:02:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224358 * 2009-11-06 18:36, Thomas Lotze wrote: > I obviously don't. The sooner, the better. I'm going to merge the code on Sunday, if nobody objects. Best 06 Nov 2009 11:34:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224357 Fabio Tranchitella wrote: > Hello, > > I'd like to finally merge my branch which adds conditional support for > zope.security, removing the hard dep 06 Nov 2009 09:35:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224349 Martin Aspeli wrote: > Obviously, this is a Java test case, but you get the idea. Incidentally, > I think nose supports this kind of thing already, b 06 Nov 2009 07:33:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224348 Hi, I'm trying to turn the results of a test run using zope.testing (zc.recipe.testrunner) into a JUnit compliant XML format so that I can graph it 06 Nov 2009 07:12:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224347 On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 7:14 AM, Martin Aspeli <optilude+lists@gmail.com> wrote: > Something has changed in Zope 2.12 that is causing tests that use > 06 Nov 2009 05:01:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224345 Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Thu Nov 5 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Fri Nov 6 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Te 06 Nov 2009 03:59:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224344 Martin Aspeli wrote: > Hi, > > Something has changed in Zope 2.12 that is causing tests that use > PlacelessSetup's tearDown() with Five to fail: > 06 Nov 2009 00:21:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224341 Hi, Something has changed in Zope 2.12 that is causing tests that use PlacelessSetup's tearDown() with Five to fail: Error in test /Users/optilude 05 Nov 2009 22:14:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224339 On 11/5/09 14:18 , Jonathan Ballet wrote: > Hi Adam, > > On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 7:11 PM, Adam GROSZER<agroszer@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hello Jonathan, > 05 Nov 2009 14:42:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224338 Hi Adam, On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 7:11 PM, Adam GROSZER <agroszer@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Jonathan, > > bin/buildout -N does not fit you? In fact, w 05 Nov 2009 05:18:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224337 Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Wed Nov 4 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Thu Nov 5 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Te 05 Nov 2009 03:59:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224335 Hello, I'd like to finally merge my branch which adds conditional support for zope.security, removing the hard dependency between zope.component[zcml 04 Nov 2009 23:58:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224333 Hello Jonathan, bin/buildout -N does not fit you? Wednesday, November 4, 2009, 5:50:45 PM, you wrote: JB> Hi Roger, JB> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 5:1 04 Nov 2009 10:11:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224330 Hi Roger, On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 5:15 PM, Roger Ineichen <dev@projekt01.ch> wrote: > Hi Jonathan > > In general any improvment is welcome as long as 04 Nov 2009 08:50:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224328 Hi Jonathan > Betreff: [Zope-dev] Relative path support for z3c.recipe.paster? > > Hi, > > Since zc.recipe.egg 1.2.0, there's an option to generate 04 Nov 2009 08:15:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224325 Hi, Since zc.recipe.egg 1.2.0, there's an option to generate scripts which contains relative paths to eggs installed in the eggs/ directory [1] This 04 Nov 2009 07:34:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224324 Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Tue Nov 3 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Wed Nov 4 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Te 04 Nov 2009 03:59:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224321 Martijn Faassen wrote: > Thomas Lotze wrote: >> I wonder: should we start requiring that the object passed to setSite() >> implement (or even be adap 03 Nov 2009 23:21:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224319 On Nov 3, 2009, at 4:48 PM, Chris McDonough wrote: > Gary Poster wrote: ... >> It is an advocacy piece only in the sense that we are saying that, 03 Nov 2009 14:14:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224318 Gary Poster wrote: > I had a "rethinking interfaces" talk accepted. It's about the positives > and negatives of zope.interface and zope.component, d 03 Nov 2009 13:48:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224329 On Nov 3, 2009, at 3:28 PM, Lennart Regebro wrote: > 2009/11/3 Gary Poster <gary.poster@gmail.com>: >> I had a "rethinking interfaces" talk accepted. 03 Nov 2009 12:32:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224317 2009/11/3 Gary Poster <gary.poster@gmail.com>: > I had a "rethinking interfaces" talk accepted.  It's about the > positives and negatives of zope.inte 03 Nov 2009 12:28:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224316 I had a "rethinking interfaces" talk accepted. It's about the positives and negatives of zope.interface and zope.component, driven primarily from 03 Nov 2009 12:11:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224315 Chris McDonough wrote: > So were any Zope talks/tutorials accepted? I have no idea, besides BFG, which is at the very least Zope related. :) Lennart 03 Nov 2009 11:36:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224314 I also proposed a Grok tutorial, but I've had no word about its acceptance or declination. My zope talk where I would discuss Grok, buildout and zope. 03 Nov 2009 11:34:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224313 So were any Zope talks/tutorials accepted? FWIW, Tres had a BFG talk accepted, and Carlos had a BFG talk and a BFG tutorial accepted. I proposed a 03 Nov 2009 11:13:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224312 Andreas Jung wrote: > Hi there, > > I am currently working on the plan for the www.zope.org relaunch. > > Rough ideas are documented here: > > http 03 Nov 2009 08:52:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224310 Thomas Lotze wrote: > Thomas Lotze wrote: > >> While writing tests for the zope.site.hooks module I'm moving to >> zope.component, I notice that the 03 Nov 2009 08:49:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224309 Chris McDonough wrote: [snip] > Another way to avoid this in the future besides joining the committee would be > for notable members of the Zope comm 03 Nov 2009 08:47:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224311 Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Mon Nov 2 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Tue Nov 3 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Te 03 Nov 2009 03:59:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224307 Hello Christian, On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Christian Theune <ct@gocept.com> wrote: > [...] btw: do you log the seed if > you generated one?) 03 Nov 2009 02:21:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224306 On 10/19/2009 11:57 AM, Jonathan Ballet wrote: > Hello there, > > as I mentioned by Sebastien, the patch has been commited into the > sdouche-shuffle 03 Nov 2009 02:07:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224304 FWIW, Martijn is correct. Python 2.4 does not like values > 2**31-1 for list indexes, slices, e.a. even on 64 bit systems. I have disabled the res 03 Nov 2009 01:23:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224303 2009/11/2 Chris McDonough <chrism@plope.com>: > Another way to avoid this in the future besides joining the committee would > be for notable members o 03 Nov 2009 00:03:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224302 Am 02.11.2009, 14:44 Uhr, schrieb Chris McDonough <chrism@plope.com>: > It's "who you know", not "what you know" unfortunately, even in open > sour 02 Nov 2009 10:49:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224301 On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Andreas Jung <lists@zopyx.com> wrote: > I am going one step further and propose to support officially only > Python 2. 02 Nov 2009 08:34:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224300 Andreas Jung wrote: > I am going one step further and propose to support officially only > Python 2.6 I thought that was Zope 2.13 with Zope 2.12 as 02 Nov 2009 08:03:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224299 Lennart Regebro wrote: > The result of this was that yesterday it looked like almost no Zope > talks would be accepted, because during the last weedin 02 Nov 2009 05:44:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224298 Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Sun Nov 1 13:00:00 2009 UTC to Mon Nov 2 13:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Te 02 Nov 2009 04:59:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224297 I was on the PyCon-PC this and last year. Unfortunately, I had less time this year, and the workload was higher, and the time shorter, so they were fo 01 Nov 2009 23:37:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224292 2009/10/31 Tres Seaver <tseaver@palladion.com>: > I can't reproduce this failure when running the Acquisition 2.12.4 tests > with Python 2.4 on my mac 01 Nov 2009 05:43:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224289 Am 31.10.09 18:53, schrieb Tres Seaver: > Zope Tests Summarizer wrote: > > Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. > > Period Fri Oct 30 13:00:00 01 Nov 2009 05:09:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224288 Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Sat Oct 31 13:00:00 2009 UTC to Sun Nov 1 13:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Te 01 Nov 2009 04:59:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224287 Adam Groszer wrote: > Hello, > > After quickly glancing over plone.behavior it seems more like > something to extend a schema, and does it solve the 31 Oct 2009 21:30:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224285 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Zope Tests Summarizer wrote: > Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. > Period Fri Oct 30 13:00:00 31 Oct 2009 10:53:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224284 On 10/25/2009 03:16 PM, Adam GROSZER wrote: > Hello, > > I have the bad feeling (still need to investigate further) that when > running zope3 with WS 31 Oct 2009 06:28:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224283 Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Fri Oct 30 13:00:00 2009 UTC to Sat Oct 31 13:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Te 31 Oct 2009 05:59:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224281 yuppie wrote: >> He is more familiar with the zopectl code >>> and he already fixed some other regressions caused by his refactoring. >> I have? New 30 Oct 2009 09:50:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224279 Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Thu Oct 29 13:00:00 2009 UTC to Fri Oct 30 13:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Te 30 Oct 2009 05:59:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224275 Hi! Chris Withers wrote: > yuppie wrote: >> I hope Chris W. will fix this. > > I'll try and have a look before Nov 1st. Great! > He is more fam 29 Oct 2009 06:26:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224273 Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Wed Oct 28 13:00:00 2009 UTC to Thu Oct 29 13:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Te 29 Oct 2009 05:59:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224272 Hello, After quickly glancing over plone.behavior it seems more like something to extend a schema, and does it solve the problem of "new properties - 28 Oct 2009 11:06:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224270 Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Tue Oct 27 13:00:00 2009 UTC to Wed Oct 28 13:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Te 28 Oct 2009 05:59:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224269 yuppie wrote: > I hope Chris W. will fix this. I'll try and have a look before Nov 1st. He is more familiar with the zopectl code > and he already 28 Oct 2009 02:00:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224267 Hi! Andreas Jung wrote: > Am 26.10.09 22:28, schrieb yuppie: >> Andreas Jung wrote: >> >>> I plan to release Zope 2.12.1 on November 2nd, 2009. > 27 Oct 2009 12:40:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224266 Am 26.10.09 22:28, schrieb yuppie: > Andreas Jung wrote: > >> I plan to release Zope 2.12.1 on November 2nd, 2009. >> >> Objections or open issues? 27 Oct 2009 12:04:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224265 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 yuppie wrote: > Andreas Jung wrote: >> I plan to release Zope 2.12.1 on November 2nd, 2009. >> >> Objec 27 Oct 2009 10:53:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224263 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 yuppie wrote: > Andreas Jung wrote: >> I plan to release Zope 2.12.1 on November 2nd, 2009. >> >> Objec 27 Oct 2009 10:53:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224264 yuppie wrote: >>>> And it doesn't work on Windows. >>> Have you tried it? >> ...if you had, you would have noticed that the Win32 service stuff as >> 27 Oct 2009 06:40:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224262 Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Mon Oct 26 13:00:00 2009 UTC to Tue Oct 27 13:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Te 27 Oct 2009 05:59:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224261 Andreas Jung wrote: > I plan to release Zope 2.12.1 on November 2nd, 2009. > > Objections or open issues? I'd like to nominate this bug: https://bug 26 Oct 2009 14:28:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224259 Hi Chris! Chris Withers wrote: > (updating myself much much later) (replying much much later) > Chris Withers wrote: >> yuppie wrote: >>>>> You ri 26 Oct 2009 14:18:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224258 Am 26.10.09 14:13, schrieb Eric Steele: > On Oct 23, 2009, at 1:15 PM, Andreas Jung wrote: >> I plan to release Zope 2.12.1 on November 2nd, 2009. >> 26 Oct 2009 06:28:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224257 On Oct 23, 2009, at 1:15 PM, Andreas Jung wrote: > I plan to release Zope 2.12.1 on November 2nd, 2009. > > Objections or open issues? > > Andreas > 26 Oct 2009 06:13:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224256 Am 26.10.09 10:25, schrieb Sylvain Viollon: > > I agree it will be great, if that issue is fixed: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope2/+bug/360761 26 Oct 2009 06:12:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224255 Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Sun Oct 25 13:00:00 2009 UTC to Mon Oct 26 13:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Te 26 Oct 2009 05:59:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224254 On 10/25/09 15:08 , Adam GROSZER wrote: > Hello, > > Custom schema properties proposal > ================================= > > The problem > --------- 26 Oct 2009 02:45:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224252 On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 19:15:54 +0200 Andreas Jung <lists@zopyx.com> wrote: Hello, > I plan to release Zope 2.12.1 on November 2nd, 2009. > > Object 26 Oct 2009 02:25:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224251 Hi Adam > Betreff: [Zope-dev] proposal: Custom schema properties > > Hello, > > Custom schema properties proposal > ============================= 25 Oct 2009 16:27:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224250 Hello, I have the bad feeling (still need to investigate further) that when running zope3 with WSGI and paster the shutdown is not a proper shutdown 25 Oct 2009 07:16:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224249 Hello, Custom schema properties proposal ================================= The problem ------------ is that we have a "baseline" project. This basel 25 Oct 2009 07:08:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224248 Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Sat Oct 24 13:00:00 2009 UTC to Sun Oct 25 13:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 16 messages: 16 from Zope 25 Oct 2009 05:59:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224247 Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Fri Oct 23 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Sat Oct 24 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Te 24 Oct 2009 04:59:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224245 On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 04:57:27PM +0200, Florian Friesdorf wrote: > I use vim with ctags And so do I. > which works fine for python code but I woul 23 Oct 2009 12:37:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224242 I plan to release Zope 2.12.1 on November 2nd, 2009. Objections or open issues? Andreas -- ZOPYX Ltd. & Co KG \ ZOPYX & Friends Charlott 23 Oct 2009 10:15:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224241 I use vim with ctags which works fine for python code but I would like to give it some understanding for page templates, genericsetup xml files and zc 23 Oct 2009 07:57:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224240 Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Thu Oct 22 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Fri Oct 23 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Te 23 Oct 2009 04:59:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224239 On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 17:42, Hanno Schlichting <hanno@hannosch.eu> wrote: > You can just name that option "eggs" in the recipe part. If it is > spec 23 Oct 2009 02:37:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224237 Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Wed Oct 21 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Thu Oct 22 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Te 22 Oct 2009 04:59:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224234 On Oct 22, 2009, at 08:32 , Andreas Jung wrote: > Am 22.10.09 08:07, schrieb Jens Vagelpohl: >> There are no microsite plans for the CMF. I was hopin 21 Oct 2009 23:38:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224232 Am 22.10.09 08:07, schrieb Jens Vagelpohl: > > On Oct 22, 2009, at 06:46 , Andreas Jung wrote: > >> Regarding the Zope3/ZTK and CMF subprojects: what 21 Oct 2009 23:32:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224231 On Oct 22, 2009, at 06:46 , Andreas Jung wrote: > Regarding the Zope3/ZTK and CMF subprojects: what are the plans > of those subjects for moving to d 21 Oct 2009 23:07:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224230 Hi there, I am currently working on the plan for the www.zope.org relaunch. Rough ideas are documented here: http://www.coactivate.org/projects/www 21 Oct 2009 21:46:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224229 [Meant to send to the list as well; sorry.] On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 12:22 PM, Leonardo Rochael Almeida <leorochael@gmail.com> wrote: > It didn't soun 21 Oct 2009 09:57:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224228 On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 18:05, Fred Drake <fdrake@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Thomas Lotze <tl@gocept.com> wrote: >> I wonde 21 Oct 2009 09:22:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224227 On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Thomas Lotze <tl@gocept.com> wrote: > I wonder: should we start requiring that the object passed to setSite() > impl 21 Oct 2009 09:05:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224226 Thomas Lotze wrote: > While writing tests for the zope.site.hooks module I'm moving to > zope.component, I notice that the module calls getSiteManage 21 Oct 2009 07:54:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224225 On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 17:42, Hanno Schlichting <hanno@hannosch.eu> wrote: > Feel free to change the code. If you want a new release just ping me > a 21 Oct 2009 05:53:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224224 Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Tue Oct 20 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Wed Oct 21 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Te 21 Oct 2009 04:59:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224223 On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 8:28 AM, Thomas Lotze <tl@gocept.com> wrote: > As these two interfaces have the same concept of a site that > zope.component h 21 Oct 2009 02:09:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224221 Baiju M wrote: > I can see your changes, but it will appear > in the site when 2.12.1 is released. > > May be we should have a '2.13' or 'dev' doc si 21 Oct 2009 00:40:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224220 On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Chris Withers <chris@simplistix.co.uk> wrote: > Baiju M wrote: >> >> Now I realize how it happened. There is an svn:e 21 Oct 2009 00:38:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224219 Baiju M wrote: > Now I realize how it happened. There is an svn:external inside > zope2docs/trunk/releases (svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main/zope2docs/re 21 Oct 2009 00:30:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224218