<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Zope | Dev</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>23 Nov  2009 10:40:52 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>Zope Tests: 6 OK</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Sun Nov 22 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Mon Nov 23 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Te</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 03:59:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224480</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Testrunner option for running tests in random order?!?</title>
<description>Hello, On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Jonathan Ballet &amp;lt;jonathan.ballet@securactive.net&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Hello Christian, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 11:07</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 01:27:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224478</link>
</item><item>
<title>Zope Tests: 6 OK</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Sat Nov 21 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Sun Nov 22 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Te</description>
<pubDate>22 Nov  2009 03:59:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224477</link>
</item><item>
<title>Zope Tests: 6 OK</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Fri Nov 20 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Sat Nov 21 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Te</description>
<pubDate>21 Nov  2009 03:59:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224475</link>
</item><item>
<title>Zope Tests: 6 OK</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Thu Nov 19 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Fri Nov 20 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Te</description>
<pubDate>20 Nov  2009 03:59:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224473</link>
</item><item>
<title>Zope Tests: 6 OK</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Wed Nov 18 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Thu Nov 19 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Te</description>
<pubDate>19 Nov  2009 03:59:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224471</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Handling instance specific configuration files with buildout</title>
<description>Am 18.11.2009, 14:48 Uhr, schrieb Hanno Schlichting &amp;lt;hanno@hannosch.eu&amp;gt;: &amp;gt; We use this snippet for something similar: &amp;gt; [link-extensions] &amp;gt; recipe =</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2009 06:19:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224469</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Handling instance specific configuration files with buildout</title>
<description>Am 18.11.2009, 14:42 Uhr, schrieb Chris Withers &amp;lt;chris@simplistix.co.uk&amp;gt;: &amp;gt; I don&amp;#039;t understand what you&amp;#039;re trying to say :-S hehe. Stuff needs to go</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2009 05:50:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224468</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Handling instance specific configuration files with buildout</title>
<description>On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Charlie Clark &amp;lt;charlie.clark@clark-consulting.eu&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; There is, however, one thing I haven&amp;#039;t quite worked out ho</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2009 05:48:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224467</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Handling instance specific configuration files with buildout</title>
<description>Charlie Clark wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; You have a few options: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; 1 - just leave them as they are &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I just need to link/copy from something parts/instance/etc/co</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2009 05:42:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224466</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Handling instance specific configuration files with buildout</title>
<description>Am 18.11.2009, 14:19 Uhr, schrieb Chris Withers &amp;lt;chris@simplistix.co.uk&amp;gt;: Hi Chris, &amp;gt; You have a few options: &amp;gt; 1 - just leave them as they are I</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2009 05:28:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224465</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Handling instance specific configuration files with buildout</title>
<description>Charlie Clark wrote: &amp;gt; There is, however, one thing I haven&amp;#039;t quite worked out how to do is add  &amp;gt; stuff to the instance&amp;#039;s &amp;quot;etc&amp;quot; folder. We have some</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2009 05:19:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224464</link>
</item><item>
<title>Handling instance specific configuration files with buildout</title>
<description>Hi, thanks to Hanno&amp;#039;s help I&amp;#039;m up and running with buildout. Having spent the  last couple of years tied to to some frozen Zope and CMF checkouts it</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2009 04:29:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224463</link>
</item><item>
<title>Zope Tests: 6 OK</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Tue Nov 17 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Wed Nov 18 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Te</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2009 03:59:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224462</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Setuptools / Distribute</title>
<description>Am 17.11.2009, 16:35 Uhr, schrieb Attila OlÃ¡h &amp;lt;attilaolah@gmail.com&amp;gt;: &amp;gt; One minor note, if you use the new bootstrap.py provided by distribute &amp;gt; ( h</description>
<pubDate>17 Nov  2009 07:39:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224458</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Setuptools / Distribute</title>
<description>Am 17.11.2009, 14:05 Uhr, schrieb Hanno Schlichting &amp;lt;hanno@hannosch.eu&amp;gt;: &amp;gt; Preference comes down to personal choice right now. For most of the &amp;gt; basi</description>
<pubDate>17 Nov  2009 05:17:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224452</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Setuptools / Distribute</title>
<description>On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Charlie Clark &amp;lt;charlie.clark@clark-consulting.eu&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m about to migrate my first Zope to project to buildout</description>
<pubDate>17 Nov  2009 05:05:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224451</link>
</item><item>
<title>Zope Tests: 6 OK</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Mon Nov 16 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Tue Nov 17 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Te</description>
<pubDate>17 Nov  2009 03:59:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224447</link>
</item><item>
<title>Setuptools / Distribute</title>
<description>Hi, I&amp;#039;m about to migrate my first Zope to project to buildout. Does it matter  whether I use setuptools or distribute? And is there any preference f</description>
<pubDate>17 Nov  2009 01:44:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224445</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Contributing initgroups upstream</title>
<description>On 05:29 pm, faassen@startifact.com wrote: &amp;gt;exarkun@twistedmatrix.com wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt;I don&amp;#039;t think there should be any licensing issues, as the ZPL is &amp;gt;&amp;gt;pr</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 13:32:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224443</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Contributing initgroups upstream</title>
<description>exarkun@twistedmatrix.com wrote: &amp;gt; I don&amp;#039;t think there should be any licensing issues, as the ZPL is pretty &amp;gt; permissive and the code is very short.</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 09:29:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224441</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Contributing initgroups upstream</title>
<description>On 11/16/2009 05:04 PM, Andreas Jung wrote: &amp;gt; Am 16.11.09 16:51, schrieb Tres Seaver: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Martijn Faassen wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; exarkun@twistedmatrix.com wrote: &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 08:41:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224440</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Contributing initgroups upstream</title>
<description>Am 16.11.09 16:51, schrieb Tres Seaver: &amp;gt; Martijn Faassen wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; exarkun@twistedmatrix.com wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; I&amp;#039;ve just contributed a patch</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 08:04:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224435</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Contributing initgroups upstream</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Martijn Faassen wrote: &amp;gt; exarkun@twistedmatrix.com wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; I&amp;#039;ve just contributed a patch to</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 07:51:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224434</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Contributing initgroups upstream</title>
<description>exarkun@twistedmatrix.com wrote: &amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;ve just contributed a patch to CPython adding os.initgroups based on &amp;gt; this extension module: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;  ht</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 07:27:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224433</link>
</item><item>
<title>Contributing initgroups upstream</title>
<description>Hi, I&amp;#039;ve just contributed a patch to CPython adding os.initgroups based on this extension module:  http://svn.zope.org/Zope/trunk/src/initgroups/</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 07:07:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224432</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Merging the zope.component&amp;#039;s conditional support for zope.security</title>
<description>Fabio Tranchitella wrote: &amp;gt; Hello, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; * 2009-11-16 10:25, Martijn Faassen wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; Anyone willing to make a new release of zope.component and zope</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 04:37:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224430</link>
</item><item>
<title>Zope Tests: 6 OK</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Sun Nov 15 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Mon Nov 16 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Te</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 03:59:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224429</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Merging the zope.component&amp;#039;s conditional support	for zope.security</title>
<description>Hello, * 2009-11-16 10:25, Martijn Faassen wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Anyone willing to make a new release of zope.component and zope.sendmmail, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; or give me the p</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 01:26:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224427</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Merging the zope.component&amp;#039;s conditional support for zope.security</title>
<description>Hey, Fabio Tranchitella wrote: &amp;gt; Anyone willing to make a new release of zope.component and zope.sendmmail, &amp;gt; or give me the pypi access to do it? W</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 01:20:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224426</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Merging the zope.component&amp;#039;s conditional support	for zope.security</title>
<description>Anyone willing to make a new release of zope.component and zope.sendmmail, or give me the pypi access to do it? Thanks, Fabio * 2009-11-08 13:35, Fa</description>
<pubDate>15 Nov  2009 07:27:55 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224422</link>
</item><item>
<title>Zope Tests: 6 OK</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Sat Nov 14 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Sun Nov 15 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Te</description>
<pubDate>15 Nov  2009 03:59:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224421</link>
</item><item>
<title>Vote on PyPI comments</title>
<description>Hi All, Apologies for the cross post, but I&amp;#039;m not sure this has received the publicity it deserves... PyPI grew a commenting and rating system a wh</description>
<pubDate>13 Nov  2009 07:39:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224412</link>
</item><item>
<title>Zope Tests: 6 OK</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Thu Nov 12 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Fri Nov 13 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Te</description>
<pubDate>13 Nov  2009 03:59:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224410</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Zope 2.12 - one more ZPublisher event</title>
<description>On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:29, Martin Aspeli &amp;lt;optilude+lists@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Wouldn&amp;#039;t it be better to just move</description>
<pubDate>12 Nov  2009 04:11:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224408</link>
</item><item>
<title>Zope Tests: 6 OK, 1 Unknown</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Wed Nov 11 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Thu Nov 12 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 7 messages: 1 from Carlos.</description>
<pubDate>12 Nov  2009 03:59:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224407</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Zope 2.12 - one more ZPublisher event</title>
<description>Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote: &amp;gt; Wouldn&amp;#039;t it be better to just move IPubFailure before the abort? Is &amp;gt; there a reason for subscribing to such an even</description>
<pubDate>12 Nov  2009 03:29:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224406</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Zope 2.12 - one more ZPublisher event</title>
<description>Wouldn&amp;#039;t it be better to just move IPubFailure before the abort? Is there a reason for subscribing to such an event which would required the transacti</description>
<pubDate>12 Nov  2009 02:55:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224405</link>
</item><item>
<title>Automated Acceptance Test</title>
<description>You may have more luck on zope-dev (cc&amp;#039;d). :-) Stefan  On 11.11.2009, at 18:37, Carlos.Solis wrote: &amp;gt; Dear all, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I&#039;m trying to find an open</description>
<pubDate>11 Nov  2009 14:36:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224403</link>
</item><item>
<title>Zope Tests: 6 OK</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Tue Nov 10 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Wed Nov 11 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Te</description>
<pubDate>11 Nov  2009 03:59:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224402</link>
</item><item>
<title>Zope 2.12 - one more ZPublisher event</title>
<description>Hi, In Zope 2.12 ZPublisher we have a good set of events now, which provide useful hooks for modifying the response before or after publication. Ho</description>
<pubDate>10 Nov  2009 23:53:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224400</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Packing and GC versus packtime</title>
<description>Reinout van Rees wrote: &amp;gt; Sounds like you&amp;#039;re working on your zeo sync tool? :-) zeoraid. It&amp;#039;s been around for a while now, but it&amp;#039;s finally going to</description>
<pubDate>10 Nov  2009 06:00:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224396</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Packing and GC versus packtime</title>
<description>On 2009-11-09, Christian Theune &amp;lt;ct@gocept.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; On 11/09/2009 02:47 PM, Jim Fulton wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 7:22 AM, Christian Theune</description>
<pubDate>10 Nov  2009 05:20:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224395</link>
</item><item>
<title>Zope Tests: 6 OK</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Mon Nov 9 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Tue Nov 10 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Te</description>
<pubDate>10 Nov  2009 03:59:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224394</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: zc.relationship - can&amp;#039;t pickle module objects</title>
<description>Hi Patrick. I do not have privileges for this egg, and am not  responsible for it. I&amp;#039;m hopeful someone can help you with it, though. Gary  On Nov</description>
<pubDate>09 Nov  2009 08:04:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224389</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Packing and GC versus packtime</title>
<description>On 11/09/2009 02:47 PM, Jim Fulton wrote: &amp;gt; On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 7:22 AM, Christian Theune &amp;lt;ct@gocept.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m wondering: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>09 Nov  2009 05:54:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224388</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Packing and GC versus packtime</title>
<description>On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 7:22 AM, Christian Theune &amp;lt;ct@gocept.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m wondering: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Scenario 1: I pack a storage to a time T and appe</description>
<pubDate>09 Nov  2009 05:47:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224387</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Packing and GC versus packtime</title>
<description>On 11/09/2009 01:22 PM, Christian Theune wrote: &amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m wondering: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Scenario 1: I pack a storage to a time T and append X transactions afte</description>
<pubDate>09 Nov  2009 04:59:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224386</link>
</item><item>
<title>Packing and GC versus packtime</title>
<description>Hi, I&amp;#039;m wondering: Scenario 1: I pack a storage to a time T and append X transactions after that Scenario 2: I append X transactions to a storage a</description>
<pubDate>09 Nov  2009 04:22:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224385</link>
</item><item>
<title>Zope Tests: 6 OK</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Sun Nov 8 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Mon Nov 9 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Te</description>
<pubDate>09 Nov  2009 03:59:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224384</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: zc.relationship - can&amp;#039;t pickle module objects</title>
<description>Hi, while this &amp;quot;can&amp;#039;t pickle&amp;quot; issue is fixed in zc.relationship, the latest packaged egg of plone.relations still depends on zc.relationship&amp;lt;1.1. Thu</description>
<pubDate>09 Nov  2009 02:55:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224383</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Merging the zope.component&amp;#039;s conditional support	for zope.security</title>
<description>Hello, * 2009-11-06 20:34, Fabio Tranchitella wrote: &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m going to merge the code on Sunday, if nobody objects. I merged the branch back to zope.co</description>
<pubDate>08 Nov  2009 04:35:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224379</link>
</item><item>
<title>Zope Tests: 6 OK</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Sat Nov 7 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Sun Nov 8 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Te</description>
<pubDate>08 Nov  2009 03:59:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224376</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Writing output logs from zope.testing.testrunner</title>
<description>Martin Aspeli wrote: &amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m trying to turn the results of a test run using zope.testing &amp;gt; (zc.recipe.testrunner) into a JUnit compliant XML f</description>
<pubDate>07 Nov  2009 08:46:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224370</link>
</item><item>
<title>Zope Tests: 6 OK</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Fri Nov 6 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Sat Nov 7 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Te</description>
<pubDate>07 Nov  2009 03:59:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224369</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: persistent product registry optional?</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Chris Withers wrote: &amp;gt; Hanno Schlichting wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; Does anyone know how to correctly fix this? We coul</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 13:31:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224360</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: persistent product registry optional?</title>
<description>On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 10:02 PM, Chris Withers &amp;lt;chris@simplistix.co.uk&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Hanno Schlichting wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Maybe my work &amp;gt;&amp;gt; in making the persistent</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 13:12:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224359</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: persistent product registry optional?</title>
<description>Hanno Schlichting wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Does anyone know how to correctly fix this? We could make the tear-down &amp;gt;&amp;gt; code in Five more robust, obviously, but I fear</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 13:02:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224358</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Merging the zope.component&amp;#039;s conditional support	for zope.security</title>
<description>* 2009-11-06 18:36, Thomas Lotze wrote: &amp;gt; I obviously don&amp;#039;t. The sooner, the better. I&amp;#039;m going to merge the code on Sunday, if nobody objects. Best</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 11:34:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224357</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Merging the zope.component&amp;#039;s conditional support for	zope.security</title>
<description>Fabio Tranchitella wrote: &amp;gt; Hello, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;d like to finally merge my branch which adds conditional support for &amp;gt; zope.security, removing the hard dep</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 09:35:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224349</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Writing output logs from zope.testing.testrunner</title>
<description>Martin Aspeli wrote: &amp;gt; Obviously, this is a Java test case, but you get the idea. Incidentally, &amp;gt; I think nose supports this kind of thing already, b</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 07:33:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224348</link>
</item><item>
<title>Writing output logs from zope.testing.testrunner</title>
<description>Hi, I&amp;#039;m trying to turn the results of a test run using zope.testing (zc.recipe.testrunner) into a JUnit compliant XML format so that I can graph it</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 07:12:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224347</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Zope 2.12 and Five - setting of Products.meta_types</title>
<description>On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 7:14 AM, Martin Aspeli &amp;lt;optilude+lists@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Something has changed in Zope 2.12 that is causing tests that use &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 05:01:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224345</link>
</item><item>
<title>Zope Tests: 6 OK</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Thu Nov 5 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Fri Nov 6 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Te</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 03:59:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224344</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Zope 2.12 and Five - setting of Products.meta_types</title>
<description>Martin Aspeli wrote: &amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Something has changed in Zope 2.12 that is causing tests that use &amp;gt; PlacelessSetup&amp;#039;s tearDown() with Five to fail: &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 00:21:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224341</link>
</item><item>
<title>Zope 2.12 and Five - setting of Products.meta_types</title>
<description>Hi, Something has changed in Zope 2.12 that is causing tests that use PlacelessSetup&amp;#039;s tearDown() with Five to fail: Error in test /Users/optilude</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 22:14:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224339</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Relative path support for z3c.recipe.paster?</title>
<description>On 11/5/09 14:18 , Jonathan Ballet wrote: &amp;gt; Hi Adam, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 7:11 PM, Adam GROSZER&amp;lt;agroszer@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Hello Jonathan, &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 14:42:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224338</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Relative path support for z3c.recipe.paster?</title>
<description>Hi Adam, On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 7:11 PM, Adam GROSZER &amp;lt;agroszer@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Hello Jonathan, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; bin/buildout -N does not fit you? In fact, w</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 05:18:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224337</link>
</item><item>
<title>Zope Tests: 6 OK</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Wed Nov 4 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Thu Nov 5 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Te</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 03:59:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224335</link>
</item><item>
<title>Merging the zope.component&amp;#039;s conditional support for zope.security</title>
<description>Hello, I&amp;#039;d like to finally merge my branch which adds conditional support for zope.security, removing the hard dependency between zope.component[zcml</description>
<pubDate>04 Nov  2009 23:58:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224333</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Relative path support for z3c.recipe.paster?</title>
<description>Hello Jonathan, bin/buildout -N does not fit you? Wednesday, November 4, 2009, 5:50:45 PM, you wrote: JB&amp;gt; Hi Roger, JB&amp;gt; On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 5:1</description>
<pubDate>04 Nov  2009 10:11:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224330</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Relative path support for z3c.recipe.paster?</title>
<description>Hi Roger, On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 5:15 PM, Roger Ineichen &amp;lt;dev@projekt01.ch&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Hi Jonathan &amp;gt; &amp;gt; In general any improvment is welcome as long as</description>
<pubDate>04 Nov  2009 08:50:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224328</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Relative path support for z3c.recipe.paster?</title>
<description>Hi Jonathan &amp;gt; Betreff: [Zope-dev] Relative path support for z3c.recipe.paster? &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Since zc.recipe.egg 1.2.0, there&amp;#039;s an option to generate</description>
<pubDate>04 Nov  2009 08:15:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224325</link>
</item><item>
<title>Relative path support for z3c.recipe.paster?</title>
<description>Hi, Since zc.recipe.egg 1.2.0, there&amp;#039;s an option to generate scripts which contains relative paths to eggs installed in the eggs/ directory [1] This</description>
<pubDate>04 Nov  2009 07:34:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224324</link>
</item><item>
<title>Zope Tests: 6 OK</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Tue Nov 3 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Wed Nov 4 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Te</description>
<pubDate>04 Nov  2009 03:59:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224321</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Where does ISite belong conceptually?</title>
<description>Martijn Faassen wrote: &amp;gt; Thomas Lotze wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; I wonder: should we start requiring that the object passed to setSite() &amp;gt;&amp;gt; implement (or even be adap</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 23:21:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224319</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: A note on the PyCon Program committee.</title>
<description>On Nov 3, 2009, at 4:48 PM, Chris McDonough wrote: &amp;gt; Gary Poster wrote: ... &amp;gt;&amp;gt; It is an advocacy piece only in the sense that we are saying that,</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 14:14:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224318</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: A note on the PyCon Program committee.</title>
<description>Gary Poster wrote: &amp;gt; I had a &amp;quot;rethinking interfaces&amp;quot; talk accepted. It&amp;#039;s about the positives &amp;gt; and negatives of zope.interface and zope.component, d</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 13:48:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224329</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: A note on the PyCon Program committee.</title>
<description>On Nov 3, 2009, at 3:28 PM, Lennart Regebro wrote: &amp;gt; 2009/11/3 Gary Poster &amp;lt;gary.poster@gmail.com&amp;gt;: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; I had a &amp;quot;rethinking interfaces&amp;quot; talk accepted.</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 12:32:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224317</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: A note on the PyCon Program committee.</title>
<description>2009/11/3 Gary Poster &amp;lt;gary.poster@gmail.com&amp;gt;: &amp;gt; I had a &amp;quot;rethinking interfaces&amp;quot; talk accepted.  It&amp;#039;s about the &amp;gt; positives and negatives of zope.inte</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 12:28:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224316</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: A note on the PyCon Program committee.</title>
<description>I had a &amp;quot;rethinking interfaces&amp;quot; talk accepted. It&amp;#039;s about the  positives and negatives of zope.interface and zope.component, driven  primarily from</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 12:11:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224315</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: A note on the PyCon Program committee.</title>
<description>Chris McDonough wrote: &amp;gt; So were any Zope talks/tutorials accepted? I have no idea, besides BFG, which is at the very least Zope related. :) Lennart</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 11:36:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224314</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: A note on the PyCon Program committee.</title>
<description>I also proposed a Grok tutorial, but I&amp;#039;ve had no word about its acceptance or declination. My zope talk where I would discuss Grok, buildout and zope.</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 11:34:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224313</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: A note on the PyCon Program committee.</title>
<description>So were any Zope talks/tutorials accepted? FWIW, Tres had a BFG talk accepted, and Carlos had a BFG talk and a BFG tutorial accepted. I proposed a</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 11:13:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224312</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: CMF/Zope3-ZTK Microsites</title>
<description>Andreas Jung wrote: &amp;gt; Hi there, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I am currently working on the plan for the www.zope.org relaunch. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Rough ideas are documented here: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; http</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 08:52:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224310</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Where does ISite belong conceptually?</title>
<description>Thomas Lotze wrote: &amp;gt; Thomas Lotze wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; While writing tests for the zope.site.hooks module I&amp;#039;m moving to &amp;gt;&amp;gt; zope.component, I notice that the</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 08:49:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224309</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: A note on the PyCon Program committee.</title>
<description>Chris McDonough wrote: [snip] &amp;gt; Another way to avoid this in the future besides joining the committee would be &amp;gt; for notable members of the Zope comm</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 08:47:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224311</link>
</item><item>
<title>Zope Tests: 6 OK</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Mon Nov 2 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Tue Nov 3 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Te</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 03:59:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224307</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Testrunner option for running tests in random order?!?</title>
<description>Hello Christian, On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Christian Theune &amp;lt;ct@gocept.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; [...] btw: do you log the seed if &amp;gt; you generated one?)</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 02:21:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224306</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Testrunner option for running tests in random order?!?</title>
<description>On 10/19/2009 11:57 AM, Jonathan Ballet wrote: &amp;gt; Hello there, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; as I mentioned by Sebastien, the patch has been commited into the &amp;gt; sdouche-shuffle</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 02:07:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224304</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Zope Tests: 6 OK, 2 Failed</title>
<description>FWIW, Martijn is correct. Python 2.4 does not like values &amp;gt; 2**31-1  for list indexes, slices, e.a. even on 64 bit systems. I have disabled  the res</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 01:23:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224303</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: A note on the PyCon Program committee.</title>
<description>2009/11/2 Chris McDonough &amp;lt;chrism@plope.com&amp;gt;: &amp;gt; Another way to avoid this in the future besides joining the committee would &amp;gt; be for notable members o</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 00:03:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224302</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: A note on the PyCon Program committee.</title>
<description>Am 02.11.2009, 14:44 Uhr, schrieb Chris McDonough &amp;lt;chrism@plope.com&amp;gt;: &amp;gt; It&amp;#039;s &amp;quot;who you know&amp;quot;, not &amp;quot;what you know&amp;quot; unfortunately, even in open  &amp;gt; sour</description>
<pubDate>02 Nov  2009 10:49:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224301</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Zope Tests: 6 OK, 2 Failed</title>
<description>On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Andreas Jung &amp;lt;lists@zopyx.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; I am going one step further and propose to support officially only &amp;gt; Python 2.</description>
<pubDate>02 Nov  2009 08:34:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224300</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Zope Tests: 6 OK, 2 Failed</title>
<description>Andreas Jung wrote: &amp;gt; I am going one step further and propose to support officially only &amp;gt; Python 2.6 I thought that was Zope 2.13 with Zope 2.12 as</description>
<pubDate>02 Nov  2009 08:03:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224299</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: A note on the PyCon Program committee.</title>
<description>Lennart Regebro wrote: &amp;gt; The result of this was that yesterday it looked like almost no Zope &amp;gt; talks would be accepted, because during the last weedin</description>
<pubDate>02 Nov  2009 05:44:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224298</link>
</item><item>
<title>Zope Tests: 7 OK, 1 Failed</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Sun Nov 1 13:00:00 2009 UTC to Mon Nov 2 13:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Te</description>
<pubDate>02 Nov  2009 04:59:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224297</link>
</item><item>
<title>A note on the PyCon Program committee.</title>
<description>I was on the PyCon-PC this and last year. Unfortunately, I had less time this year, and the workload was higher, and the time shorter, so they were fo</description>
<pubDate>01 Nov  2009 23:37:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224292</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Zope Tests: 6 OK, 2 Failed</title>
<description>2009/10/31 Tres Seaver &amp;lt;tseaver@palladion.com&amp;gt;: &amp;gt; I can&amp;#039;t reproduce this failure when running the Acquisition 2.12.4 tests &amp;gt; with Python 2.4 on my mac</description>
<pubDate>01 Nov  2009 05:43:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224289</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Zope Tests: 6 OK, 2 Failed</title>
<description>Am 31.10.09 18:53, schrieb Tres Seaver: &amp;gt; Zope Tests Summarizer wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Period Fri Oct 30 13:00:00</description>
<pubDate>01 Nov  2009 05:09:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/224288</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
