Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 04 Jul 2009 08:54:41 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg Hi, I took the Zope 3.4 KGS, removed the obvious packages that do not belong to the ZTK out of the list and created a home for the master list that d 04 Jul 2009 04:33:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222804 Hi, On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 10:44 -0400, Jim Fulton wrote: > Switching to zope-dev. > > On Jul 2, 2009, at 10:40 AM, Chris Withers wrote: > > > Jim F 04 Jul 2009 03:30:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222803 On 7/3/09 1:29 PM, Tres Seaver wrote: >> In general, I find deploying as zip files to be an anti-feature. In >> seems especially insane when extensio 03 Jul 2009 13:44:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222802 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jim Fulton wrote: > On Jul 2, 2009, at 8:39 PM, Tim Hoffman wrote: > >> Hi all >> >> Can I make a sugg 03 Jul 2009 10:29:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222801 Hi Tobias Cool Just something to note google recently upped the file limit to 3000 so don't be too agressive generating those zips ;-) T > > Great 03 Jul 2009 06:21:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222800 On 03.07.2009, at 12:33, Jim Fulton wrote: > On Jul 3, 2009, at 6:25 AM, Tim Hoffman wrote: > >> Hi Jim >> >> That is what I am doing now, the proble 03 Jul 2009 05:08:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222798 On Jul 3, 2009, at 6:25 AM, Tim Hoffman wrote: > Hi Jim > > That is what I am doing now, the problem I see though is when someone > upates (via build 03 Jul 2009 03:33:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222797 Hi Jim That is what I am doing now, the problem I see though is when someone upates (via buildout etc.... a) module they need to remember to remove 03 Jul 2009 03:25:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222796 On Jul 2, 2009, at 8:39 PM, Tim Hoffman wrote: > Hi all > > Can I make a suggestion that would make a couple of modules more gae > friendly ;-) > zop 03 Jul 2009 03:04:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222795 Tobias Rodäbel wrote: > Sorry, I don't agree. We assume an imp.load_dynamic function from what > we read in the python documentation. But the implem 03 Jul 2009 02:09:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222794 On 03.07.2009, at 10:38, Chris Withers wrote: > Tim Hoffman wrote: >> gae/1.333250465889549129/zope/i18nmessageid/ >> _zope_i18nmessageid_message.py 03 Jul 2009 02:05:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222793 I suppose that depends on your point of view. They exception is actually saying that imp.load_dynamic is not implemented, not that it can't load the 03 Jul 2009 02:05:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222792 Tim Hoffman wrote: > gae/1.333250465889549129/zope/i18nmessageid/_zope_i18nmessageid_message.py", > line 6, in __bootstrap__ > imp.load_dynamic(__ 03 Jul 2009 01:38:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222791 Hi, yes, I'd really appreciate such a modification. Then I could delete the regarding code in my rod.recipe.appengine, which provides a dummy imp 03 Jul 2009 01:33:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222790 Hi all Can I make a suggestion that would make a couple of modules more gae friendly ;-) zope.interface and zope.i18nmessageid have 'c' optimisations 02 Jul 2009 17:39:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222789 On 02.07.09 19:41, Jonas Meurer wrote: > On 02/07/2009 Andreas Jung wrote: > >>> On 02/07/2009 Andreas Jung wrote: >>> >>>>> Compiling /usr/ 02 Jul 2009 10:47:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222787 On 02/07/2009 Andreas Jung wrote: > > On 02/07/2009 Andreas Jung wrote: > >>> Compiling /usr/lib/zope2.11/lib/python/mechanize/_firefox3cookiejar.py . 02 Jul 2009 10:41:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222786 On 02.07.09 19:23, Jonas Meurer wrote: > Hello again, > > first, thanks for the fast response. > > On 02/07/2009 Andreas Jung wrote: > >>> Compilin 02 Jul 2009 10:37:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222785 Hello again, first, thanks for the fast response. On 02/07/2009 Andreas Jung wrote: > > Compiling /usr/lib/zope2.11/lib/python/mechanize/_firefox3co 02 Jul 2009 10:23:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222784 On Jul 2, 2009, at 12:11 PM, Hanno Schlichting wrote: > On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Jim Fulton<jim@zope.com> wrote: >> >> On Jul 2, 2009, at 7:58 02 Jul 2009 10:12:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222783 On 02.07.09 18:32, Jonas Meurer wrote: > Hello, > > at preparing zope2.11.3 for debian, i came across several byte-compiling > errors. > > three of th 02 Jul 2009 09:39:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222782 Hello, at preparing zope2.11.3 for debian, i came across several byte-compiling errors. three of them are due to the new tests for python2.5 and pyt 02 Jul 2009 09:32:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222781 On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 3:41 PM, Jim Fulton<jim@zope.com> wrote: > > On Jul 2, 2009, at 7:58 AM, Hanno Schlichting wrote: > >> and zope.app.zcmlfiles s 02 Jul 2009 09:11:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222780 On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 10:41 -0400, Jim Fulton wrote: > On Jul 2, 2009, at 10:06 AM, Christian Theune wrote: > > > On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 09:59 -0400, 02 Jul 2009 07:51:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222779 Switching to zope-dev. On Jul 2, 2009, at 10:40 AM, Chris Withers wrote: > Jim Fulton wrote: >> buildout works fine. The problem is the zope.testing 02 Jul 2009 07:44:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222778 On Jul 2, 2009, at 10:06 AM, Christian Theune wrote: > On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 09:59 -0400, Jim Fulton wrote: >> On Jul 2, 2009, at 9:55 AM, Christian 02 Jul 2009 07:41:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222777 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, This is a heads-up that affects anyone accessing the SVN repositories using the svn:// proto 02 Jul 2009 07:16:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222776 On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 09:59 -0400, Jim Fulton wrote: > On Jul 2, 2009, at 9:55 AM, Christian Theune wrote: > > > I just released zope.testing 3.7.7. 02 Jul 2009 07:06:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222775 On Jul 2, 2009, at 9:55 AM, Christian Theune wrote: > I just released zope.testing 3.7.7. > > It only contains a single change: installing the test r 02 Jul 2009 06:59:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222774 I just released zope.testing 3.7.7. It only contains a single change: installing the test runner callable via a console_script entry point to allow s 02 Jul 2009 06:55:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222773 On Jul 2, 2009, at 7:58 AM, Hanno Schlichting wrote: > On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Jim Fulton<jim@zope.com> wrote: >> zope.app.module provides s 02 Jul 2009 06:41:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222772 On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Jim Fulton<jim@zope.com> wrote: > zope.app.module provides support for persistemt modules. > zope.app.interface provi 02 Jul 2009 04:58:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222771 I think the KGS should define 3 categories of packages: - ZTK packages These are packages we maintain and expect people to build things on. - Te 02 Jul 2009 04:19:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222770 zope.app.module provides support for persistemt modules. zope.app.interface provides support for persistent interfaces. Both rely on a highly expe 02 Jul 2009 03:30:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222769 On Jul 1, 2009, at 1:42 PM, Stephan Richter wrote: > On Wednesday 01 July 2009, Jim Fulton wrote: >> What is the difference between zope.release and 01 Jul 2009 13:35:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222766 On Wednesday 01 July 2009, Jim Fulton wrote: > What is the difference between zope.release and zope.kgs? Is the > latter a fossil? Does it need to g 01 Jul 2009 10:42:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222765 On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Hanno Schlichting<hanno@hannosch.eu> wrote: > Just did that for Python 2.4 to 2.6. Thanks, Hanno! -Fred -- Fre 01 Jul 2009 10:38:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222764 On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Fred Drake<fdrake@gmail.com> wrote: > I've made a source distribution available via PyPI: > >  http://pypi.python.org 01 Jul 2009 09:30:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222763 I just released zope.interface 3.5.2, which adds only this bug fix: - BaseAdapterRegistry.unregister, unsubscribe: Remove empty portions of the dat 01 Jul 2009 09:01:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222762 On Jun 30, 2009, at 10:14 AM, Stephan Richter wrote: > On Tuesday 30 June 2009, Jim Fulton wrote: >> I should know this, but I don't. What is the re 01 Jul 2009 08:48:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222761 Wichert Akkerman wrote: > On 6/30/09 7:03 PM, Stephan Richter wrote: >> It is needed for the "latest-versions" script as this parses XML. I consider > 01 Jul 2009 05:47:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222760 On Jun 30, 2009, at 7:25 PM, Stephan Richter wrote: >> Given that this locks down versions, wouldn't it make more sense to >> not check in configurati 01 Jul 2009 03:18:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222759 On Jul 1, 2009, at 1:08 AM, Wolfgang Schnerring wrote: > * Tres Seaver <tseaver@palladion.com> [2009-06-30 20:41]: >> Jim Fulton wrote: >>> I should 01 Jul 2009 03:12:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222758 On Jul 1, 2009, at 1:08 AM, Wolfgang Schnerring wrote: > * Tres Seaver <tseaver@palladion.com> [2009-06-30 20:41]: >> Jim Fulton wrote: >>> I should 01 Jul 2009 02:12:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222757 On Jun 30, 2009, at 2:41 PM, Tres Seaver wrote: ... > IMO, Any ZTK package should be testable via plain 'python2.{5,6} > setup.py test'. If that does 01 Jul 2009 02:08:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222756 On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 7:08 AM, Wolfgang Schnerring<ws@gocept.com> wrote: > I think it would be useful to standardize on *one* compatibility testing > 01 Jul 2009 01:55:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222755 Hello, I think then it's the widgets bad behavour. It should do a ``newValue = previousValue.__class__(newItems)`` instead of a dumb ``newValue = 01 Jul 2009 01:26:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222754 * Tres Seaver <tseaver@palladion.com> [2009-06-30 20:41]: > Jim Fulton wrote: >> I should know this, but I don't. What is the recommended way to test 30 Jun 2009 22:08:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222753 On Tuesday 30 June 2009, Jim Fulton wrote: > > And here it is. > > OK, this sorta looks like what I got with Python 2.4. It probably > would have b 30 Jun 2009 16:25:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222752 On Jun 30, 2009, at 4:51 PM, Tres Seaver wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Jim Fulton wrote: > >> I'm not familiar with th 30 Jun 2009 14:49:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222751 On Jun 30, 2009, at 1:04 PM, Stephan Richter wrote: > On Tuesday 30 June 2009, Stephan Richter wrote: >> I'll report the full output when it is done. 30 Jun 2009 14:47:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222750 Hi Paul > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: zope-dev-bounces@zope.org > [mailto:zope-dev-bounces@zope.org] Im Auftrag von Paul Carduner > 30 Jun 2009 14:04:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222748 On Jun 30, 2009, at 1:03 PM, Stephan Richter wrote: ... > I am running the tests as I am writing this. So far I got one failure: > > Traceback (most r 30 Jun 2009 13:55:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222747 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jim Fulton wrote: > I'm not familiar with the static-deps option. To what? Its setup.py? $ wget http 30 Jun 2009 13:51:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222746 On Jun 30, 2009, at 2:35 PM, Tres Seaver wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Tim Hoffman wrote: >> I have to chime in here t 30 Jun 2009 13:35:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222745 I noticed that PersistentList and PersistentDict do not satisfy zope.schema.List or zope.schema.Dict, which is rather annoying. For example: class I 30 Jun 2009 12:17:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222744 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jim Fulton wrote: > I should know this, but I don't. What is the recommended way to test > changes t 30 Jun 2009 11:41:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222743 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Tim Hoffman wrote: > I have to chime in here too > > lxml is a real pain and seems to be problematic t 30 Jun 2009 11:35:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222742 Can't use lxml on google app engine either. I use ElementTree. If only the lxml extensions to the etree API were available in ElementTree, especiall 30 Jun 2009 10:45:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222741 On Tuesday 30 June 2009, Jim Fulton wrote: > On Jun 30, 2009, at 1:03 PM, Stephan Richter wrote: > ... > > > 2. Run python bootstrap.py > > Which Pyth 30 Jun 2009 10:44:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222740 On Jun 30, 2009, at 1:03 PM, Stephan Richter wrote: ... > 2. Run python bootstrap.py Which Python? 2.4, 2.5, 2.6? All of the above? Jim -- Jim Fult 30 Jun 2009 10:32:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222739 On Jun 30, 2009, at 1:03 PM, Stephan Richter wrote: > I consider > lxml pretty much the standard tool to do XML in Python these days. I don't want to 30 Jun 2009 10:25:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222738 On 6/30/09 7:03 PM, Stephan Richter wrote: > It is needed for the "latest-versions" script as this parses XML. I consider > lxml pretty much the stand 30 Jun 2009 10:18:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222737 On Tuesday 30 June 2009, Stephan Richter wrote: > I'll report the full output when it is done. And here it is. Regards, Stephan -- Entrepreneur and 30 Jun 2009 10:04:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222749 On Tuesday 30 June 2009, Jim Fulton wrote: > I should know this, but I don't. What is the recommended way to test > changes to core ZTK packages to 30 Jun 2009 10:03:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222736 Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Mon Jun 29 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Tue Jun 30 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Te 30 Jun 2009 05:00:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222735 I have to chime in here too lxml is a real pain and seems to be problematic to get a straightforward build for packages other than ZTK as well. I ha 30 Jun 2009 04:11:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222733 I should know this, but I don't. What is the recommended way to test changes to core ZTK packages to mitigate the risk that changes affect other 30 Jun 2009 03:28:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222732 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Aaron Lehmann wrote: > Log message for revision 101312: > Add 'zope.app.component' to the 'test' extr 29 Jun 2009 13:18:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222731 On 29.06.09 19:33, yuppie wrote: > Hi Andreas! > > > Andreas Jung wrote: > >> On 29.06.09 12:48, yuppie wrote: >> >>> 3.) remove security decl 29 Jun 2009 10:42:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222730 Hi Andreas! Andreas Jung wrote: > On 29.06.09 12:48, yuppie wrote: >> 3.) remove security declarations from ZCTextIndex and DateRangeIndex >> >> All 29 Jun 2009 10:33:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222729 On 29.06.09 12:48, yuppie wrote: > Hi! > > > I did plan to work on a small catalog improvement, but after looking at > the code I'd like to do some c 29 Jun 2009 10:14:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222728 Em Seg, 2009-06-29 às 11:18 +0100, Paul Wilson escreveu: > 2009/6/29 Martijn Faassen <faassen@startifact.com> > > > > Hi there, > > > > Paul Wilson w 29 Jun 2009 08:10:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222727 Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Sun Jun 28 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Mon Jun 29 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Te 29 Jun 2009 05:00:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222726 On 6/29/09 12:48 PM, yuppie wrote: > Hi! > > > I did plan to work on a small catalog improvement, but after looking at > the code I'd like to do some 29 Jun 2009 04:07:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222724 Hi! I did plan to work on a small catalog improvement, but after looking at the code I'd like to do some cleanup first: 1.) remove the deprecated 29 Jun 2009 03:48:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222723 2009/6/29 Martijn Faassen <faassen@startifact.com> > > Hi there, > > Paul Wilson wrote: > > I'm about to embark on a module to serialize Zope schemas 29 Jun 2009 03:18:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222722 Hello, * 2009-06-29 10:25, Martijn Faassen wrote: > Seems like a bug at first glance. Feel free to add the dependency back > (though I hope we can l 29 Jun 2009 01:34:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222721 Hi there, Paul Wilson wrote: > I'm about to embark on a module to serialize Zope schemas into the JSON > format for my application, taking inspirati 29 Jun 2009 01:26:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222720 Hi there, Fabio Tranchitella wrote: > While analyzing the dependency graph of one of our applications, I found > some missing dependencies. I'm not s 29 Jun 2009 01:24:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222719 Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Sat Jun 27 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Sun Jun 28 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Te 28 Jun 2009 05:00:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222714 Do we have a Z3 event being fired during the app-server shutdown phase (comparable to IProcessingEvent)? Andreas 28 Jun 2009 01:06:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222711 This is done. On 6/26/09 2:15 AM, Chris McDonough wrote: > Would anyone mind if I made a new release of zope.18nmessageid? It > would probably be ve 27 Jun 2009 16:14:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222709 Hi, I'm about to embark on a module to serialize Zope schemas into the JSON format for my application, taking inspiration from z3c.schema2xml. I've h 27 Jun 2009 11:23:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222708 Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Fri Jun 26 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Sat Jun 27 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Te 27 Jun 2009 05:00:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222705 Hello, While analyzing the dependency graph of one of our applications, I found some missing dependencies. I'm not sure these are bugs, but I'd like 27 Jun 2009 00:47:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222703 Hi Christian, Thanks for this! > Have a look at the attached file, it contains the code that I extracted > from a project in a hurry, but if the app 26 Jun 2009 08:38:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222700 On Thu, 2009-06-25 at 13:05 +0200, Hermann Himmelbauer wrote: > Am Mittwoch 24 Juni 2009 19:19:17 schrieb Reinout van Rees: > > Hi all, > > > > In mes 26 Jun 2009 07:42:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222699 Hi there, On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 18:30 +0800, Martin Aspeli wrote: > Hi, > > Is there any documentation on zope.proxy other than the test? I don't > 26 Jun 2009 07:34:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222698 On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 08:36 +0200, Fabio Tranchitella wrote: > Hello, > > it looks like zope.sendmail should depend on transaction (because that's > 26 Jun 2009 07:25:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222697 On Fri, 2009-06-26 at 02:15 -0400, Chris McDonough wrote: > Would anyone mind if I made a new release of zope.18nmessageid? It would > probably be v 26 Jun 2009 07:23:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222696 Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Thu Jun 25 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Fri Jun 26 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Te 26 Jun 2009 05:00:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222695 Martin Aspeli wrote: > Is there any documentation on zope.proxy other than the test? I don't > speak C anymore. :) I find ``zope.location.location.L 26 Jun 2009 03:58:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222691 Martin Aspeli wrote: > Is there any documentation on zope.proxy other than the test? I don't > speak C anymore. :) I find ``zope.location.location.L 26 Jun 2009 03:58:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222692 Hi, Is there any documentation on zope.proxy other than the test? I don't speak C anymore. :) Basically, I'm curious if it would be possible to imp 26 Jun 2009 03:30:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222690 Hello, it looks like zope.sendmail should depend on transaction (because that's what it is using, importing it) and not on the full ZODB3. Am I miss 25 Jun 2009 23:36:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222687 Would anyone mind if I made a new release of zope.18nmessageid? It would probably be version 3.5.0. The last release was in 2007, and the trunk cod 25 Jun 2009 23:15:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222686 Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Wed Jun 24 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Thu Jun 25 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Te 25 Jun 2009 05:00:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222684 Am Mittwoch 24 Juni 2009 19:19:17 schrieb Reinout van Rees: > Hi all, > > In messages like > http://www.mail-archive.com/zope3-dev@zope.org/msg05964.h 25 Jun 2009 04:05:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222682 On 2009-06-24, Gary Poster <gary.poster@gmail.com> wrote: > > zc.async can be used to do cron-like activities by starting a job, > to be performed aft 25 Jun 2009 01:18:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/222681