<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Zope | Dev</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>12 Feb  2012 14:18:09 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>zope-tests - FAILED: 2, OK: 40, UNKNOWN: 2</title>
<description>This is the summary for test reports received on the zope-tests list between 2012-02-10 00:00:00 UTC and 2012-02-11 00:00:00 UTC: See the footnotes</description>
<pubDate>11 Feb  2012 17:00:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232642</link>
</item><item>
<title>zope-tests - FAILED: 6, OK: 67, UNKNOWN: 3</title>
<description>This is the summary for test reports received on the zope-tests list between 2012-02-09 00:00:00 UTC and 2012-02-10 00:00:00 UTC: See the footnotes</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 17:00:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232640</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: zope-tests - FAILED: 9, OK: 86, UNKNOWN: 2</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 02/09/2012 08:00 PM, Zope tests summarizer wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; [1]  UNKNOWN UNKNOWN : Zope-trunk Python-2.</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 08:24:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232637</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Checkins] SVN: Zope/trunk/versions.cfg Make &amp;#039;elementtree&amp;#039; version explicit.</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 02/10/2012 02:51 AM, Michael Howitz wrote: &amp;gt; Am 09.02.2012 um 17:44 schrieb Tres Seaver: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Log mess</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 06:21:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232636</link>
</item><item>
<title>[zc.buildout] AttributeError: &amp;#039;NoneType&amp;#039; object has no attribute &amp;#039;location&amp;#039;</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I have a Plone 4.2 buildout where I upgraded the zc.buildout version from 1.4.2 to 1.5.2 for the integr</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 02:59:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232635</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Checkins] SVN: Zope/trunk/versions.cfg Make &amp;#039;elementtree&amp;#039; version explicit.</title>
<description>Am 09.02.2012 um 17:44 schrieb Tres Seaver: &amp;gt; Log message for revision 124344: &amp;gt; Make &amp;#039;elementtree&amp;#039; version explicit. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Changed: &amp;gt; U  Zope/trunk</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 23:51:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232633</link>
</item><item>
<title>zope-tests - FAILED: 9, OK: 86, UNKNOWN: 2</title>
<description>This is the summary for test reports received on the zope-tests list between 2012-02-08 00:00:00 UTC and 2012-02-09 00:00:00 UTC: See the footnotes</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 17:00:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232632</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Hello</title>
<description>On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Andreas Jung &amp;lt;lists@zopyx.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- &amp;gt; Hash: SHA1 &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Hi there, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; the committ</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 07:05:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232626</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Hello</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi there, the committer committee of the Zope Foundation lately agreed on the new naming convention &amp;lt;f</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 06:59:16 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232625</link>
</item><item>
<title>Hello</title>
<description>Hello everybody, i got commit access to the zope repository last night... would it be possible to change my username from &amp;quot;franco.pellegrini&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;frap</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 06:50:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232624</link>
</item><item>
<title>zope-tests - FAILED: 24, OK: 53, UNKNOWN: 2</title>
<description>This is the summary for test reports received on the zope-tests list between 2012-02-07 00:00:00 UTC and 2012-02-08 00:00:00 UTC: See the footnotes</description>
<pubDate>08 Feb  2012 17:00:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232617</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: TreeVocabulary in zope.schema.vocabulary</title>
<description>Hiya, ... lots cut ... I like the _populateIndexes() method. Having a single pass without a  signifying parameter makes it easier to understand. A</description>
<pubDate>08 Feb  2012 04:35:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232612</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: zope-tests - FAILED: 26, OK: 39, UNKNOWN: 2</title>
<description>On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Gediminas Paulauskas &amp;lt;menesis@pov.lt&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; The majority of failures are in zope.testrunner, due to recent update</description>
<pubDate>08 Feb  2012 02:14:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232611</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: zope-tests - FAILED: 26, OK: 39, UNKNOWN: 2</title>
<description>2012/2/8 Zope tests summarizer &amp;lt;noreply@zope.org&amp;gt;: &amp;gt; This is the summary for test reports received on the &amp;gt; zope-tests list between 2012-02-06 00:00:0</description>
<pubDate>08 Feb  2012 01:07:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232610</link>
</item><item>
<title>zope-tests - FAILED: 26, OK: 39, UNKNOWN: 2</title>
<description>This is the summary for test reports received on the zope-tests list between 2012-02-06 00:00:00 UTC and 2012-02-07 00:00:00 UTC: See the footnotes</description>
<pubDate>07 Feb  2012 17:00:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232609</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: ZAM/ZMI Demo</title>
<description>On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 13:07, Sylvain Viollon &amp;lt;sylvain@infrae.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt;  That would be great, for my part to be able to have the management tools</description>
<pubDate>07 Feb  2012 11:15:16 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232607</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [BlueBream] ZAM Demo Documentation</title>
<description>Am 06.02.2012 um 21:35 schrieb Christopher Lozinski: [...] &amp;gt; ZAM User Documentation. Nice text. [...] &amp;gt; QUESTION: So where should i put this docume</description>
<pubDate>07 Feb  2012 07:59:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232606</link>
</item><item>
<title>zope-tests - FAILED: 21, OK: 74</title>
<description>This is the summary for test reports received on the zope-tests list between 2012-02-05 00:00:00 UTC and 2012-02-06 00:00:00 UTC: See the footnotes</description>
<pubDate>06 Feb  2012 17:00:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232604</link>
</item><item>
<title>ZAM Demo Documentation</title>
<description>There are a number of people interested in ZAM, and a lot of discussion about a new ZMI, even an upcoming sprint so I am trying to do my part to get z</description>
<pubDate>06 Feb  2012 12:35:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232601</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [zope2] 2.12.x formal end-of-life</title>
<description>On Feb 6, 2012, at 9:45 AM, Hanno Schlichting wrote: &amp;gt; Hi. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I just updated the 2.12.x branch with one last batch of bugfix &amp;gt; versions. I&amp;#039;ll let th</description>
<pubDate>06 Feb  2012 10:08:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232600</link>
</item><item>
<title>[zope2] 2.12.x formal end-of-life</title>
<description>Hi. I just updated the 2.12.x branch with one last batch of bugfix versions. I&amp;#039;ll let the buildbots run and if there&amp;#039;s no troubles release one more v</description>
<pubDate>06 Feb  2012 09:45:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232599</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: ZAM/ZMI Demo</title>
<description>&amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt;  Having different roles will help greatly yes, and even if we end up with &amp;gt; multiple packages that would still be a great idea to have, but aga</description>
<pubDate>06 Feb  2012 09:41:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232598</link>
</item><item>
<title>ZTK maintenance releases coming up</title>
<description>Hi. I just updated the ZTK 1.0 and 1.1 branches to all latest bugfix versions. I&amp;#039;ll give the buildbots until Wednesday to build and find any real pr</description>
<pubDate>06 Feb  2012 08:25:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232597</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: ZAM/ZMI Demo</title>
<description>Hello, Op 6 feb 2012, om 17:06 heeft Christopher Lozinski het volgende geschreven: &amp;gt; Very good point about different user types.  Maybe we could ha</description>
<pubDate>06 Feb  2012 08:21:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232592</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: ZAM/ZMI Demo</title>
<description>Very good point about different user types.  Maybe we could have different permissions on the different roles, and people only get to see their versi</description>
<pubDate>06 Feb  2012 08:06:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232591</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Zope 4 release management</title>
<description>On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Martijn Faassen &amp;lt;faassen@startifact.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; I would actually argue that &amp;quot;Zope4&amp;quot; have no real release cycle at</description>
<pubDate>06 Feb  2012 07:59:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232590</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Zope 4 release management</title>
<description>On 11/17/2011 07:01 PM, Martin Aspeli wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; I would actually argue that &amp;quot;Zope4&amp;quot; have no real release cycle at all: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; instead, the individual pie</description>
<pubDate>06 Feb  2012 07:41:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232589</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: ZAM/ZMI Demo</title>
<description>Hello, Op 6 feb 2012, om 10:26 heeft Lennart Regebro het volgende geschreven: &amp;gt; This is at least an important attitude. &amp;gt; I think also a future admi</description>
<pubDate>06 Feb  2012 04:07:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232587</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: ZAM/ZMI Demo</title>
<description>On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 04:49, Roger &amp;lt;dev@projekt01.ch&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; It has an Add menu, but there is nothing to add by default. &amp;gt; You can see the Add menu</description>
<pubDate>06 Feb  2012 01:26:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232586</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: TreeVocabulary in zope.schema.vocabulary</title>
<description>On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 15:42 +0100, Charlie Clark wrote: &amp;gt; Am 30.01.2012, 14:33 Uhr, schrieb Jan-Carel Brand &amp;lt;lists@opkode.com&amp;gt;: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; ... lots cut ...</description>
<pubDate>06 Feb  2012 01:12:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232585</link>
</item><item>
<title>zope-tests - FAILED: 7, OK: 64</title>
<description>This is the summary for test reports received on the zope-tests list between 2012-02-04 00:00:00 UTC and 2012-02-05 00:00:00 UTC: See the footnotes</description>
<pubDate>05 Feb  2012 17:00:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232584</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: ZAM/ZMI Demo</title>
<description>Hi Christopher &amp;gt; -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- &amp;gt; Von: zope-dev-bounces@zope.org [mailto:zope-dev-bounces@zope.org] Im Auftrag &amp;gt; von Christopher L</description>
<pubDate>04 Feb  2012 19:49:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232582</link>
</item><item>
<title>zope-tests - FAILED: 2, OK: 64</title>
<description>This is the summary for test reports received on the zope-tests list between 2012-02-03 00:00:00 UTC and 2012-02-04 00:00:00 UTC: See the footnotes</description>
<pubDate>04 Feb  2012 17:00:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232581</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Zope 4 release management</title>
<description>On Thu, 2012-02-02 at 08:46 +0100, Jens Vagelpohl wrote: &amp;gt; Hi Chris, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; For what it&amp;#039;s worth, in the Pylons Project, we decided to continue &amp;gt; &amp;gt; req</description>
<pubDate>04 Feb  2012 07:44:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232579</link>
</item><item>
<title>ZAM/ZMI Demo</title>
<description>On 2/1/12 10:39 AM, Laurence Rowe wrote: &amp;gt; I wasn&amp;#039;t able to get zam.demo (svn trunk) to run, so I don&amp;#039;t have an &amp;gt; opinion on ZAM itself at the moment</description>
<pubDate>04 Feb  2012 03:34:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232578</link>
</item><item>
<title>zope-tests - FAILED: 2, OK: 64</title>
<description>This is the summary for test reports received on the zope-tests list between 2012-02-02 00:00:00 UTC and 2012-02-03 00:00:00 UTC: See the footnotes</description>
<pubDate>03 Feb  2012 17:00:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232577</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: zope-tests - FAILED: 2, OK: 64</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Yay, huge improvement! Thanks to Michael Howitz and Jim Fulton for their fixes. &amp;gt; [1]  FAILED Zope</description>
<pubDate>03 Feb  2012 11:06:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232571</link>
</item><item>
<title>zope-tests - FAILED: 2, OK: 64</title>
<description>This is the summary for test reports received on the zope-tests list between 2012-02-01 00:00:00 UTC and 2012-02-02 00:00:00 UTC: See the footnotes</description>
<pubDate>02 Feb  2012 17:00:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232569</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Zope 4 release management</title>
<description>On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 15:40, Alexandre Garel &amp;lt;alex.garel@tarentis.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m a bit amazed by this argumentation. I think one important thing i</description>
<pubDate>02 Feb  2012 14:31:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232566</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Zope 4 release management</title>
<description>On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 14:29, Alex Clark &amp;lt;aclark@aclark.net&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; On 2/1/12 8:21 AM, Lennart Regebro wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Should you then decide &amp;gt;&amp;gt; that gith</description>
<pubDate>02 Feb  2012 14:27:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232565</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Zope 4 release management</title>
<description>Hi Chris, &amp;gt; For what it&amp;#039;s worth, in the Pylons Project, we decided to continue &amp;gt; requiring the signing of a contributor&amp;#039;s agreement (more or less the</description>
<pubDate>01 Feb  2012 23:46:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232551</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Zope 4 release management</title>
<description>On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 16:29 +0100, Jens Vagelpohl wrote: &amp;gt; On Feb 1, 2012, at 15:53 , Charlie Clark wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Currently the hurdle to getting involve</description>
<pubDate>01 Feb  2012 19:01:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232550</link>
</item><item>
<title>zope-tests - FAILED: 26, OK: 41</title>
<description>This is the summary for test reports received on the zope-tests list between 2012-01-31 00:00:00 UTC and 2012-02-01 00:00:00 UTC: See the footnotes</description>
<pubDate>01 Feb  2012 17:00:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232549</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: zope-tests - FAILED: 27, OK: 40</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 02/01/2012 09:57 AM, Michael Howitz wrote: &amp;gt; Am 01.02.2012 um 02:00 schrieb Zope tests summarizer: [</description>
<pubDate>01 Feb  2012 14:48:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232547</link>
</item><item>
<title>Announcement: 2012 Zope Foundation Board Elections and General Meeting</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 (Apologies in advance for the cross-post: we need this to reach the whole Zope community).  The Zope</description>
<pubDate>01 Feb  2012 13:45:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232545</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Zope 4 ZMI sprint report</title>
<description>On 26 January 2012 04:29, Christopher Lozinski &amp;lt;lozinski@freerecruiting.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Thank you for the sprint report. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I think it is great that yo</description>
<pubDate>01 Feb  2012 07:39:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232543</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Zope 4 release management</title>
<description>On Feb 1, 2012, at 15:53 , Charlie Clark wrote: &amp;gt; Currently the hurdle to getting involved is signing and sending the committer agreement. A hurdle wh</description>
<pubDate>01 Feb  2012 07:29:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232542</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Zope 4 release management</title>
<description>On 1 February 2012 14:35, Jonathan Ballet &amp;lt;jon@multani.info&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 02:21:32PM +0100, Lennart Regebro wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; What we w</description>
<pubDate>01 Feb  2012 07:26:49 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232541</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: zope-tests - FAILED: 27, OK: 40</title>
<description>Am 01.02.2012 um 02:00 schrieb Zope tests summarizer: [...] &amp;gt; [1]  FAILED ZTK 1.0 / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit &amp;gt;    https://mail.zope.org/pipermail</description>
<pubDate>01 Feb  2012 06:57:55 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232540</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Zope 4 release management</title>
<description>Am 01.02.2012, 15:40 Uhr, schrieb Alexandre Garel  &amp;lt;alex.garel@tarentis.com&amp;gt;: &amp;gt; All I see here is usability not religion Which is pretty much what</description>
<pubDate>01 Feb  2012 06:53:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232539</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Zope 4 release management</title>
<description>Le 01/02/2012 14:21, Lennart Regebro a écrit : &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I do think the big issue is where to host it. Yes, fine, people have &amp;gt; opinions on git vs svn vs hg</description>
<pubDate>01 Feb  2012 06:40:49 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232538</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Zope 4 release management</title>
<description>On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 02:21:32PM +0100, Lennart Regebro wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; What we would like to do, of course, is to have a self-hosted github. &amp;gt; :-) (And</description>
<pubDate>01 Feb  2012 06:35:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232537</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Zope 4 release management</title>
<description>On 02/01/2012 02:29 PM, Alex Clark wrote: &amp;gt; Actually, they introduced improved Subversion client support late last &amp;gt; year: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; - https://github.com/b</description>
<pubDate>01 Feb  2012 06:15:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232536</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Zope 4 release management</title>
<description>On 2/1/12 8:21 AM, Lennart Regebro wrote: &amp;gt; On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 13:03, Alex Clark&amp;lt;aclark@aclark.net&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; - what RCS software to use &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; - w</description>
<pubDate>01 Feb  2012 05:29:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232535</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Zope 4 release management</title>
<description>On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 13:03, Alex Clark &amp;lt;aclark@aclark.net&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; - what RCS software to use &amp;gt;&amp;gt; - where to host it &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; It may be easier if we d</description>
<pubDate>01 Feb  2012 05:21:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232534</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Zope 4 release management</title>
<description>On 2/1/12 6:08 AM, Jens Vagelpohl wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; On Feb 1, 2012, at 00:05 , Alex Clark wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Bottom line: Zope stands to benefit greatly if the curren</description>
<pubDate>01 Feb  2012 04:03:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232533</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Zope 4 release management</title>
<description>On Feb 1, 2012, at 00:05 , Alex Clark wrote: &amp;gt; Bottom line: Zope stands to benefit greatly if the current active developers keep an open mind about ho</description>
<pubDate>01 Feb  2012 03:08:55 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232532</link>
</item><item>
<title>zope-tests - FAILED: 27, OK: 40</title>
<description>This is the summary for test reports received on the zope-tests list between 2012-01-30 00:00:00 UTC and 2012-01-31 00:00:00 UTC: See the footnotes</description>
<pubDate>31 Jan  2012 17:00:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232531</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Zope 4 release management</title>
<description>Hi, Late chime-in below: On 11/17/11 2:45 PM, Tres Seaver wrote: &amp;gt; -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- &amp;gt; Hash: SHA1 &amp;gt; &amp;gt; On 11/17/2011 01:01 PM, Marti</description>
<pubDate>31 Jan  2012 15:05:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232529</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Zope 2 WSGI investigation</title>
<description>On 1/11/12 5:59 AM, Sylvain Viollon wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Op 9 jan 2012, om 12:44 heeft Marius Gedminas het volgende geschreven: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 10:</description>
<pubDate>31 Jan  2012 14:31:55 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232528</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: PyConUS sprint on Zope 4</title>
<description>Am 29.01.2012, 22:29 Uhr, schrieb Leonardo Rochael Almeida  &amp;lt;leorochael@gmail.com&amp;gt;: &amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt; Anyone going to this PyConUS who would like to sprint on</description>
<pubDate>31 Jan  2012 01:40:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232527</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Checkins] SVN: z3c.form/trunk/setup.py Get ready for 2.6.1 release.</title>
<description>On Tue 31 Jan 2012 08:24:24 AM CET, David Glick wrote: &amp;gt; On 1/30/12 11:15 PM, Adam GROSZER wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Hello, &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; I think we need to automate &amp;quot;sdist u</description>
<pubDate>31 Jan  2012 01:21:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232526</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Checkins] SVN: z3c.form/trunk/setup.py Get ready for 2.6.1 release.</title>
<description>On 1/30/12 11:15 PM, Adam GROSZER wrote: &amp;gt; Hello, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I think we need to automate &amp;quot;sdist upload&amp;quot;, the .mo files are missing &amp;gt; from the release. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; An</description>
<pubDate>30 Jan  2012 23:24:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232525</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Checkins] SVN: z3c.form/trunk/setup.py Get ready for 2.6.1 release.</title>
<description>Hello, I think we need to automate &amp;quot;sdist upload&amp;quot;, the .mo files are missing from the release. Any ideas other than patching setup.py to create the</description>
<pubDate>30 Jan  2012 23:15:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232524</link>
</item><item>
<title>zope-tests - FAILED: 27, OK: 40</title>
<description>This is the summary for test reports received on the zope-tests list between 2012-01-29 00:00:00 UTC and 2012-01-30 00:00:00 UTC: See the footnotes</description>
<pubDate>30 Jan  2012 17:00:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232523</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: TreeVocabulary in zope.schema.vocabulary</title>
<description>Snip snip &amp;gt; Marius and Souheil, what do you think about this? I think it probably &amp;gt; still makes sense to have a dict_factory as Souheil suggested, bu</description>
<pubDate>30 Jan  2012 11:42:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232521</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: how to add SOAP APIs in zope 3</title>
<description>We have used http://pypi.python.org/pypi/rpclib (v2.5) for a project. Perhaps it works for you too. -Roel On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Sanjay R</description>
<pubDate>30 Jan  2012 07:15:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232520</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: TreeVocabulary in zope.schema.vocabulary</title>
<description>Hiya,  Am 30.01.2012, 14:33 Uhr, schrieb Jan-Carel Brand &amp;lt;lists@opkode.com&amp;gt;: ... lots cut ... &amp;gt; Yes, the values must be unique, because we do value</description>
<pubDate>30 Jan  2012 06:42:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232519</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: TreeVocabulary in zope.schema.vocabulary</title>
<description>On Fri, 2012-01-27 at 11:50 +0100, Souheil CHELFOUH wrote: &amp;gt; Yes, Marius got exactly what I meant, this is how I usually make the &amp;gt; not-so-pluggable s</description>
<pubDate>30 Jan  2012 06:06:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232518</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: how to add SOAP APIs in zope 3</title>
<description>On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 6:26 AM, Sanjay Rao &amp;lt;srao@noida.interrasystems.com&amp;gt; wrote: ... &amp;gt; If anybody can give some pointers, it would be greatly apprec</description>
<pubDate>30 Jan  2012 05:59:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232517</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: TreeVocabulary in zope.schema.vocabulary</title>
<description>On Sun, 2012-01-29 at 16:17 +0100, Charlie Clark wrote: &amp;lt;snip&amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; From the zope.schema 4.0.0 release notes: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;quot;Port to Python 3. This adds a depe</description>
<pubDate>30 Jan  2012 05:33:16 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232516</link>
</item><item>
<title>how to add SOAP APIs in zope 3</title>
<description>Hi, If anybody can give some pointers, it would be greatly appreciated. Thanks &amp;amp; Regards, Sanjay Rao  _____________________________________________</description>
<pubDate>30 Jan  2012 03:26:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232515</link>
</item><item>
<title>Getting REQUEST from within RESPONSE?</title>
<description>Hi. I have a patch for Zope that sets expiry dates far into the future for certain cookies. However, I would like to know something about where the</description>
<pubDate>30 Jan  2012 02:52:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232514</link>
</item><item>
<title>zope-tests - FAILED: 34, OK: 40, UNKNOWN: 1</title>
<description>This is the summary for test reports received on the zope-tests list between 2012-01-28 00:00:00 UTC and 2012-01-29 00:00:00 UTC: See the footnotes</description>
<pubDate>29 Jan  2012 17:00:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232512</link>
</item><item>
<title>PyConUS sprint on Zope 4</title>
<description>Hi, Anyone going to this PyConUS who would like to sprint on Zope4? Topics of particular interest to me include security (as I explained in a previo</description>
<pubDate>29 Jan  2012 13:29:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232509</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: TreeVocabulary in zope.schema.vocabulary</title>
<description>Hiya, Am 27.01.2012, 12:56 Uhr, schrieb Jan-Carel Brand &amp;lt;lists@opkode.com&amp;gt;: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Hang on a minute! While I&amp;#039;m not 100 % convinced of the need in the co</description>
<pubDate>29 Jan  2012 07:17:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232508</link>
</item><item>
<title>zope-tests - FAILED: 22, OK: 44</title>
<description>This is the summary for test reports received on the zope-tests list between 2012-01-27 00:00:00 UTC and 2012-01-28 00:00:00 UTC: See the footnotes</description>
<pubDate>28 Jan  2012 17:00:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232507</link>
</item><item>
<title>zope-tests - FAILED: 22, OK: 44</title>
<description>This is the summary for test reports received on the zope-tests list between 2012-01-26 00:00:00 UTC and 2012-01-27 00:00:00 UTC: See the footnotes</description>
<pubDate>27 Jan  2012 17:00:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232505</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: TreeVocabulary in zope.schema.vocabulary</title>
<description>On Thu, 2012-01-26 at 15:42 +0100, Charlie Clark wrote: &amp;gt; Hiya, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Am 26.01.2012, 15:02 Uhr, schrieb Jan-Carel Brand &amp;lt;lists@opkode.com&amp;gt;: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Ok,</description>
<pubDate>27 Jan  2012 03:56:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232503</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: TreeVocabulary in zope.schema.vocabulary</title>
<description>Yes, Marius got exactly what I meant, this is how I usually make the not-so-pluggable stuff pluggable :) About the fact to release it out of zope.sche</description>
<pubDate>27 Jan  2012 02:50:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232502</link>
</item><item>
<title>z3c.form 2.6.0</title>
<description>Hello, Anyone against a release of that? -- Best regards,  Adam GROSZER -- Quote of the day: It is better to deserve an honor and not receive it,</description>
<pubDate>27 Jan  2012 02:13:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232501</link>
</item><item>
<title>zope-tests - FAILED: 22, OK: 44</title>
<description>This is the summary for test reports received on the zope-tests list between 2012-01-25 00:00:00 UTC and 2012-01-26 00:00:00 UTC: See the footnotes</description>
<pubDate>26 Jan  2012 17:00:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232500</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: TreeVocabulary in zope.schema.vocabulary</title>
<description>On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 04:02:54PM +0200, Jan-Carel Brand wrote: &amp;gt; On Wed, 2012-01-25 at 18:56 +0100, Souheil CHELFOUH wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; A quick note : &amp;gt; &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>26 Jan  2012 12:53:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232498</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: TreeVocabulary in zope.schema.vocabulary</title>
<description>Hiya, Am 26.01.2012, 15:02 Uhr, schrieb Jan-Carel Brand &amp;lt;lists@opkode.com&amp;gt;: &amp;gt; Ok, Charlie also expressed his reservations. I&amp;#039;ll put it in a differen</description>
<pubDate>26 Jan  2012 06:42:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232497</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: TreeVocabulary in zope.schema.vocabulary</title>
<description>Hi Souheil On Wed, 2012-01-25 at 18:56 +0100, Souheil CHELFOUH wrote: &amp;gt; A quick note : &amp;gt; &amp;gt; This quite an advanced vocabulary, why not make another p</description>
<pubDate>26 Jan  2012 06:02:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232496</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Zope 4 ZMI sprint report</title>
<description>Thank you for the sprint report.  I think it is great that you are working on upgrading the ZMI. I am also turning my attention to this problem. Cl</description>
<pubDate>25 Jan  2012 20:29:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232495</link>
</item><item>
<title>zope-tests - FAILED: 23, OK: 44</title>
<description>This is the summary for test reports received on the zope-tests list between 2012-01-24 00:00:00 UTC and 2012-01-25 00:00:00 UTC: See the footnotes</description>
<pubDate>25 Jan  2012 17:00:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232494</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: TreeVocabulary in zope.schema.vocabulary</title>
<description>A quick note : This quite an advanced vocabulary, why not make another package with a dependency on zope.schema ? I don&amp;#039;t quite see the point to have</description>
<pubDate>25 Jan  2012 09:56:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232492</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: TreeVocabulary in zope.schema.vocabulary</title>
<description>On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 01:55:28AM +0200, Jan-Carel Brand wrote: &amp;gt; On Wed, 2012-01-25 at 00:52 +0200, Marius Gedminas wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; On Tue, Jan 24, 2012</description>
<pubDate>25 Jan  2012 04:14:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232490</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: TreeVocabulary in zope.schema.vocabulary</title>
<description>Hi Charlie On Wed, 2012-01-25 at 10:37 +0100, Charlie Clark wrote: &amp;gt; Hiya, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Am 24.01.2012, 18:48 Uhr, schrieb Jan-Carel Brand &amp;lt;lists@opkode.com&amp;gt;:</description>
<pubDate>25 Jan  2012 02:12:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232487</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: TreeVocabulary in zope.schema.vocabulary</title>
<description>Hiya, Am 24.01.2012, 18:48 Uhr, schrieb Jan-Carel Brand &amp;lt;lists@opkode.com&amp;gt;: &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;ve clarified some of the docstrings and added the missing one. &amp;gt; Non</description>
<pubDate>25 Jan  2012 01:37:22 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232486</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Undo product stops working with recent Zope (StorageTransactionError)</title>
<description>On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 14:50:44 +0100, Hanno Schlichting &amp;lt;hanno@hannosch.eu&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 2:14 PM, &amp;lt;lists@nidelven-it.no&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>24 Jan  2012 23:26:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232481</link>
</item><item>
<title>zope-tests - FAILED: 23, OK: 44</title>
<description>This is the summary for test reports received on the zope-tests list between 2012-01-23 00:00:00 UTC and 2012-01-24 00:00:00 UTC: See the footnotes</description>
<pubDate>24 Jan  2012 17:00:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232480</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: TreeVocabulary in zope.schema.vocabulary</title>
<description>On Wed, 2012-01-25 at 00:52 +0200, Marius Gedminas wrote: &amp;gt; On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 07:34:03PM +0200, Jan-Carel Brand wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Missing tests: by i</description>
<pubDate>24 Jan  2012 15:55:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232478</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: TreeVocabulary in zope.schema.vocabulary</title>
<description>On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 07:34:03PM +0200, Jan-Carel Brand wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Missing tests: by inheriting from SimpleVocabulary you also gain &amp;gt; &amp;gt; .fromItems()</description>
<pubDate>24 Jan  2012 14:52:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232477</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: zope.intid and zope.keyreference.interfaces.NotYet exception (patch)</title>
<description>2012/1/25 Marius Gedminas &amp;lt;marius@gedmin.as&amp;gt;: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; http://foundation.zope.org/agreements is where you can find the &amp;gt; committer agreement form. Thanks.</description>
<pubDate>24 Jan  2012 14:49:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232476</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: zope.intid and zope.keyreference.interfaces.NotYet exception (patch)</title>
<description>On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 03:10:15PM +0100, Charlie Clark wrote: &amp;gt; Am 23.01.2012, 23:20 Uhr, schrieb Cykooz &amp;lt;cykooz@googlemail.com&amp;gt;: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt;Oh ... &amp;gt; &amp;gt;Or</description>
<pubDate>24 Jan  2012 14:33:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232475</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: TreeVocabulary in zope.schema.vocabulary</title>
<description>Hi Charlie On Tue, 2012-01-24 at 15:06 +0100, Charlie Clark wrote: &amp;gt; Hiya, &amp;gt; Am 24.01.2012, 12:35 Uhr, schrieb Jan-Carel Brand &amp;lt;lists@opkode.com&amp;gt;: &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>24 Jan  2012 09:48:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232469</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: TreeVocabulary in zope.schema.vocabulary</title>
<description>On Tue, 2012-01-24 at 16:07 +0200, Marius Gedminas wrote: &amp;gt; Incidentally, please do not hijack existing threads when you start a new &amp;gt; topic, ok? Yes</description>
<pubDate>24 Jan  2012 09:34:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232468</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: TreeVocabulary in zope.schema.vocabulary</title>
<description>On 01/24/2012 03:06 PM, Charlie Clark wrote: &amp;gt; Off the top of my head I don&amp;#039;t know which Python versions support &amp;gt; classmethods. Classmethods are fin</description>
<pubDate>24 Jan  2012 07:35:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/dev/232466</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

