Mailing List Archive: Zope: Coders

Zope tests: 4 OK, 2 Failed

1 2

View All

Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded

stefan at epy

Jan 23, 2005, 8:30 AM

Post #26 of 30 (1171 views)
Permalink

Re: Re: Zope tests: 4 OK, 2 Failed [In reply to]

That appears to have done it. Chapeau!

Stefan

On 21. Jän 2005, at 23:25, Tim Peters wrote:

> [Stefan H. Holek]
>> I have increased the sleep timeout to 30 seconds (locally).
>> Lowering the value now to find out when it starts to bork.
>
> Note that I just checked in a different approach. The test now
> queries send_action() in a loop, for up to a minute, until
> send_action() says the child is running. On most boxes the test
> should run faster now. I expect it will repair the failures on your
> box, but won't know for sure until I know you've tried it.
>
--
The time has come to start talking about whether the emperor is as well
dressed as we are supposed to think he is. /Pete McBreen/

_______________________________________________
Zope-Coders mailing list
Zope-Coders [at] zope
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-coders

steve at canonical

Jan 24, 2005, 2:58 AM

Post #27 of 30 (1163 views)
Permalink

Re: Zope tests: 4 OK, 2 Failed [In reply to]

Stefan H. Holek wrote:
> I checked in broken tests on purpose <sheepish grin>.

Please don't do that.

> I'd like to
> discuss why they fail in Zope >= 2.7.3 and what to do about it -> zope-dev.

Find some other way of getting people to look at the tests. Don't check
in failing tests.

Doing so makes things awkward for people working on unrelated bugs or
features, and people who are using the Trunk to test their software against.

--
Steve Alexander
_______________________________________________
Zope-Coders mailing list
Zope-Coders [at] zope
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-coders

zopetests at z3u

Jan 24, 2005, 4:01 AM

Post #28 of 30 (1143 views)
Permalink

Zope tests: 4 OK, 2 Failed [In reply to]

Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Sun Jan 23 12:01:01 2005 UTC to Mon Jan 24 12:01:01 2005 UTC.
There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Unit Tests.

Test failures
-------------

Subject: FAILED (errors=6) : Zope-2_7-branch Python-2.3.4 :
Linux
From: Zope Unit Tests
Date: Sun Jan 23 23:09:48 EST 2005
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2005-January/001477.html

Subject: FAILED (errors=6) : Zope-2_7-branch Python-2.4 : Linux
From: Zope Unit Tests
Date: Sun Jan 23 23:11:48 EST 2005
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2005-January/001478.html

Tests passed OK
---------------

Subject: OK : Zope-2_6-branch Python-2.1.3 : Linux
From: Zope Unit Tests
Date: Sun Jan 23 23:05:47 EST 2005
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2005-January/001475.html

Subject: OK : Zope-2_6-branch Python-2.3.4 : Linux
From: Zope Unit Tests
Date: Sun Jan 23 23:07:48 EST 2005
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2005-January/001476.html

Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.3.4 : Linux
From: Zope Unit Tests
Date: Sun Jan 23 23:13:48 EST 2005
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2005-January/001479.html

Subject: OK : Zope-trunk Python-2.4 : Linux
From: Zope Unit Tests
Date: Sun Jan 23 23:15:48 EST 2005
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2005-January/001480.html

_______________________________________________
Zope-Coders mailing list
Zope-Coders [at] zope
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-coders

chrism at plope

Jan 24, 2005, 2:34 PM

Post #29 of 30 (1136 views)
Permalink

Re: Zope tests: 4 OK, 2 Failed [In reply to]

FWIW, I'm not opposed to checking in failing tests personally if it
means we get more good unit tests (as was the case here, which brought
to light a lingering issue).

On Mon, 2005-01-24 at 05:58, Steve Alexander wrote:
> Stefan H. Holek wrote:
> > I checked in broken tests on purpose <sheepish grin>.
>
> Please don't do that.
>
>
> > I'd like to
> > discuss why they fail in Zope >= 2.7.3 and what to do about it -> zope-dev.
>
> Find some other way of getting people to look at the tests. Don't check
> in failing tests.
>
> Doing so makes things awkward for people working on unrelated bugs or
> features, and people who are using the Trunk to test their software against.

_______________________________________________
Zope-Coders mailing list
Zope-Coders [at] zope
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-coders

lists at andreas-jung

Jan 24, 2005, 10:16 PM

Post #30 of 30 (1164 views)
Permalink

Re: Zope tests: 4 OK, 2 Failed [In reply to]

--On Montag, 24. Januar 2005 17:34 Uhr -0500 Chris McDonough
<chrism [at] plope> wrote:

> FWIW, I'm not opposed to checking in failing tests personally if it
> means we get more good unit tests (as was the case here, which brought
> to light a lingering issue).
>

I am against checking in failing tests on stable release branch. I am
"shivering" all day if I see that are
some tests broken. Please mess things up on dedicated branch or on the
HEAD/trunk if necessary.

Andreas

_______________________________________________
Zope-Coders mailing list
Zope-Coders [at] zope
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-coders

1 2

View All

Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded

Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads