Login | Register For Free | Help
Search for: (Advanced)

Mailing List Archive: Zope: CMF

cmf-tests - OK: 3, UNKNOWN: 1

 

 

Zope cmf RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded


noreply at zope

May 3, 2011, 10:00 PM

Post #1 of 8 (1261 views)
Permalink
cmf-tests - OK: 3, UNKNOWN: 1

This is the summary for test reports received on the
cmf-tests list between 2011-05-02 00:00:00 UTC and 2011-05-03 00:00:00 UTC:

See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds.

An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our
buildbot documentation:
http://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit/process/buildbots.html#the-nightly-builds

Reports received
----------------

CMF-2.2 Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.5 : Linux
CMF-2.2 Zope-2.13 Python-2.6.5 : Linux
CMF-trunk Zope-2.13 Python-2.6.5 : Linux
[1] FAILED (errors=1) : CMF-trunk Zope-trunk Python-2.6.5 : Linux

Non-OK results
--------------

[1] UNKNOWN FAILED (errors=1) : CMF-trunk Zope-trunk Python-2.6.5 : Linux
https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2011-May/014709.html


_______________________________________________
Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF [at] zope
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf

See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests


noreply at zope

May 4, 2011, 10:00 PM

Post #2 of 8 (1205 views)
Permalink
cmf-tests - OK: 3, UNKNOWN: 1 [In reply to]

This is the summary for test reports received on the
cmf-tests list between 2011-05-03 00:00:00 UTC and 2011-05-04 00:00:00 UTC:

See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds.

An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our
buildbot documentation:
http://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit/process/buildbots.html#the-nightly-builds

Reports received
----------------

CMF-2.2 Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.5 : Linux
CMF-2.2 Zope-2.13 Python-2.6.5 : Linux
CMF-trunk Zope-2.13 Python-2.6.5 : Linux
[1] FAILED (errors=1) : CMF-trunk Zope-trunk Python-2.6.5 : Linux

Non-OK results
--------------

[1] UNKNOWN FAILED (errors=1) : CMF-trunk Zope-trunk Python-2.6.5 : Linux
https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2011-May/014713.html


_______________________________________________
Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF [at] zope
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf

See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests


noreply at zope

May 5, 2011, 10:00 PM

Post #3 of 8 (1201 views)
Permalink
cmf-tests - OK: 3, UNKNOWN: 1 [In reply to]

This is the summary for test reports received on the
cmf-tests list between 2011-05-04 00:00:00 UTC and 2011-05-05 00:00:00 UTC:

See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds.

An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our
buildbot documentation:
http://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit/process/buildbots.html#the-nightly-builds

Reports received
----------------

CMF-2.2 Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.5 : Linux
CMF-2.2 Zope-2.13 Python-2.6.5 : Linux
CMF-trunk Zope-2.13 Python-2.6.5 : Linux
[1] FAILED (errors=1) : CMF-trunk Zope-trunk Python-2.6.5 : Linux

Non-OK results
--------------

[1] UNKNOWN FAILED (errors=1) : CMF-trunk Zope-trunk Python-2.6.5 : Linux
https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2011-May/014717.html


_______________________________________________
Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF [at] zope
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf

See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests


noreply at zope

May 6, 2011, 10:00 PM

Post #4 of 8 (1203 views)
Permalink
cmf-tests - OK: 3, UNKNOWN: 1 [In reply to]

This is the summary for test reports received on the
cmf-tests list between 2011-05-05 00:00:00 UTC and 2011-05-06 00:00:00 UTC:

See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds.

An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our
buildbot documentation:
http://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit/process/buildbots.html#the-nightly-builds

Reports received
----------------

CMF-2.2 Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.5 : Linux
CMF-2.2 Zope-2.13 Python-2.6.5 : Linux
CMF-trunk Zope-2.13 Python-2.6.5 : Linux
[1] FAILED (errors=1) : CMF-trunk Zope-trunk Python-2.6.5 : Linux

Non-OK results
--------------

[1] UNKNOWN FAILED (errors=1) : CMF-trunk Zope-trunk Python-2.6.5 : Linux
https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2011-May/014721.html


_______________________________________________
Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF [at] zope
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf

See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests


charlie.clark at clark-consulting

Aug 7, 2011, 11:51 AM

Post #5 of 8 (922 views)
Permalink
Re: cmf-tests - OK: 3, UNKNOWN: 1 [In reply to]

Am 07.08.2011, 20:45 Uhr, schrieb Hanno Schlichting <hanno [at] hannosch>:

> So yes, while these changes look at bit evil, they do have a major
> impact.

Quite a speed-up! Unfortunately, as Jens has pointed out, it breaks
DiscussionItem in a non-obvious way.

Charlie
--
Charlie Clark
Managing Director
Clark Consulting & Research
German Office
Helmholtzstr. 20
Düsseldorf
D- 40215
Tel: +49-211-600-3657
Mobile: +49-178-782-6226
_______________________________________________
Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF [at] zope
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf

See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests


jens at dataflake

Aug 11, 2011, 12:31 PM

Post #6 of 8 (904 views)
Permalink
Re: cmf-tests - OK: 3, UNKNOWN: 1 [In reply to]

On Aug 11, 2011, at 21:10 , Hanno Schlichting wrote:

> On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Jens Vagelpohl <jens [at] dataflake> wrote:
>> After the wrapping, the discussion item has the wrong path. Even though "self", the "talkback" object, has the correct path when calling getPhysicalPath on it. I can't see anything overly stupid in the DiscussionItem code, so there has to be an issue with that Zope getPhysicalPath change. Reverting that one change in the current Zope trunk fixes the tests.
>
> Thanks for the thorough analysis!
>
> I tracked this down to a missing aq_inner call in the new
> getPhysicalPath and fixed that.
>
> The "ValueError: 'Access contents information' not found in inherited
> permissions" failures remain, which are next on my list.

Thanks for taking the time, Hanno. I wouldn't have been able to figure than one out.

jens



_______________________________________________
Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF [at] zope
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf

See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests


hanno at hannosch

Aug 11, 2011, 1:21 PM

Post #7 of 8 (905 views)
Permalink
Re: cmf-tests - OK: 3, UNKNOWN: 1 [In reply to]

On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 9:31 PM, Jens Vagelpohl <jens [at] dataflake> wrote:
> On Aug 11, 2011, at 21:10 , Hanno Schlichting wrote:
>> I tracked this down to a missing aq_inner call in the new
>> getPhysicalPath and fixed that.
> Thanks for taking the time, Hanno. I wouldn't have been able to figure than one out.

Any code that does manual __of__ wrapping is suspicious and suggests
there's Acquisition problems lurking somewhere - I just got lucky to
finding this one so fast ;)

>> The "ValueError: 'Access contents information' not found in inherited
>> permissions" failures remain, which are next on my list.

That's "fixed" as well.

The FS objects no longer have the "Access contents information"
permission. They only got that through the OFS.ZDOM base class, which
is gone in Zope 4.

Hanno
_______________________________________________
Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF [at] zope
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf

See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests


tseaver at palladion

Aug 11, 2011, 1:52 PM

Post #8 of 8 (907 views)
Permalink
Re: cmf-tests - OK: 3, UNKNOWN: 1 [In reply to]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 08/11/2011 04:21 PM, Hanno Schlichting wrote:

> Any code that does manual __of__ wrapping is suspicious and suggests
> there's Acquisition problems lurking somewhere - I just got lucky to
> finding this one so fast ;)

Hanno, didn't you hear the song? "All you need is __of___ (DAH, dah,
dadah dum)". Seriously, if manual '__of__' wrapping breaks, it is a
sign that somebody was mucking with code they didn't really understand.
;) In this case, I truly don't understand the impatience to scrap
acquisition: it is doing *exactly* what is wanted here.

>>> The "ValueError: 'Access contents information' not found in
>>> inherited permissions" failures remain, which are next on my
>>> list.
>
> That's "fixed" as well.
>
> The FS objects no longer have the "Access contents information"
> permission. They only got that through the OFS.ZDOM base class,
> which is gone in Zope 4.


Tres.
- --
===================================================================
Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tseaver [at] palladion
Palladion Software "Excellence by Design" http://palladion.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk5EQRMACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ63xgCgjuFsRSEEgUd6TB7taO2IgJRx
tSwAn3YtFAVCoFL/3ijsYhMfoX1AzxU4
=Rs6q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF [at] zope
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf

See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests

Zope cmf RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded
 
 


Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads
 
  Web Applications & Managed Hosting Powered by Gossamer Threads Inc.