Login | Register For Free | Help
Search for: (Advanced)

Mailing List Archive: Zope: CMF
[dev] Should portal_setup be registered as utility?
 

Index | Next | Previous | View Flat


y.2008 at wcm-solutions

Nov 16, 2008, 7:17 AM


Views: 1706
Permalink
[dev] Should portal_setup be registered as utility?

Hi!


CMFDefault registers portal_setup as utility. Some code in CMF depends
on that.

Plone doesn't doesn't register portal_setup as utility:
http://dev.plone.org/plone/changeset/18763

That causes some trouble in Plone:
http://dev.plone.org/plone/ticket/7714

The same issue was reported as CMF bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/+bug/263525

Due to a misunderstanding the CMF bug was marked as 'Won't Fix'.


Questions: Is there a good reason why Plone doesn't register
portal_setup as utility? Does the same reason apply to CMFDefault? Do we
have to support registered and not registered portal_setup tools?


Cheers,

Yuppie


_______________________________________________
Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF[at]lists.zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf

See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests

Subject User Time
[dev] Should portal_setup be registered as utility? y.2008 at wcm-solutions Nov 16, 2008, 7:17 AM
    Re: [dev] Should portal_setup be registered as utility? charlie at begeistert Nov 16, 2008, 7:32 AM
    Re: [dev] Should portal_setup be registered as utility? hannosch at hannosch Nov 16, 2008, 8:23 AM
        Re: [dev] Should portal_setup be registered as utility? wichert at wiggy Nov 16, 2008, 8:59 AM
        Re: [dev] Should portal_setup be registered as utility? y.2008 at wcm-solutions Nov 16, 2008, 9:11 AM
            Re: [dev] Should portal_setup be registered as utility? jens at dataflake Nov 16, 2008, 12:57 PM
            Re: [dev] Should portal_setup be registered as utility? wichert at wiggy Nov 16, 2008, 1:30 PM
                Re: [dev] Should portal_setup be registered as utility? charlie at begeistert Nov 16, 2008, 1:55 PM
                Re: [dev] Should portal_setup be registered as utility? jens at dataflake Nov 16, 2008, 2:05 PM
                    Re: [dev] Should portal_setup be registered as utility? wichert at wiggy Nov 16, 2008, 11:21 PM
                        Re: [dev] Should portal_setup be registered as utility? dieter at handshake Nov 17, 2008, 11:43 AM
                            Re: [dev] Should portal_setup be registered as utility? y.2008 at wcm-solutions Nov 18, 2008, 3:00 AM
                                Re: [dev] Should portal_setup be registered as utility? optilude at gmx Nov 18, 2008, 8:25 AM
                                    Re: [dev] Should portal_setup be registered as utility? dieter at handshake Nov 19, 2008, 10:50 AM
                                    Re: [dev] Should portal_setup be registered as utility? me at rpatterson Nov 19, 2008, 11:33 AM
                                Re: [dev] Should portal_setup be registered as utility? dieter at handshake Nov 19, 2008, 10:47 AM
                                    Re: [dev] Should portal_setup be registered as utility? y.2008 at wcm-solutions Nov 20, 2008, 3:42 AM
                                        Re: [dev] Should portal_setup be registered as utility? charlie at begeistert Nov 20, 2008, 11:33 AM
            Re: [dev] Should portal_setup be registered as utility? wichert at wiggy Nov 16, 2008, 1:30 PM
    Re: [dev] Should portal_setup be registered as utility? wichert at wiggy Nov 16, 2008, 9:02 AM
    Re: [dev] Should portal_setup be registered as utility? dieter at handshake Nov 23, 2008, 12:00 AM

  Index | Next | Previous | View Flat
 
 


Interested in having your list archived? Contact lists@gossamer-threads.com
 
  Web Applications & Managed Hosting Powered by Gossamer Threads Inc.