
jens at dataflake
Sep 23, 2008, 10:26 AM
Post #6 of 9
(1567 views)
Permalink
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sep 23, 2008, at 19:19 , Wichert Akkerman wrote: > Previously Jens Vagelpohl wrote: >> On Sep 23, 2008, at 17:01 , Wichert Akkerman wrote: >> >>> Are there any objections to making the CMFCore interfaces derived >>> classes from zope.dublincore, or possibly even using those directly >>> where possible? >> >> Do you see any specific benefit, more than just "replace our code >> with >> other code to shift the maintenance burden"? > > I found myself writing some code which needs to get dublin core data > from > content and should work for both zope3 and zope2 applications, except > for the difference in interfaces. As you already found, the ICMFDublinCore should be supported by both, right? jens -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAkjZJrwACgkQRAx5nvEhZLLyQgCgrUojEKCwI6P5I8jvU4WNQbbr ZI4AnjesKxD+A/GNmICYY3bqlp5UrdSk =HDOn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF [at] lists http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests
|