<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Zope | CMF</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>04 Jul  2009 14:32:43 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>[CMF 2.1] Opaque items</title>
<description>Hi there, I am currently migrating our CMS from CMF 1.X to CMF 2.1. The following error is raised because the original content classes are not deriv</description>
<pubDate>28 Jun  2009 23:40:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222715</link>
</item><item>
<title>GenericSetup proposal: upgrade profiles</title>
<description>Hi, Products.GenericSetup/interfaces.py says: BASE, EXTENSION = 1, 2 I propose adding another one: UPGRADE = 3 and possibly a fourth one: UNINSTALL</description>
<pubDate>23 Jun  2009 17:42:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222644</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMF Tests: No messages</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Mon Jun 22 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Tue Jun 23 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were no messages. _____________</description>
<pubDate>23 Jun  2009 05:00:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222631</link>
</item><item>
<title>[GenericSetup] Extension profile re-installing base profile</title>
<description>We are currently migration from Zope 2.8/CMF 1.X to Zope 2.11/CMF 2.1. I have a minimal base profile and two almost identical extension profiles for</description>
<pubDate>22 Jun  2009 22:48:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222628</link>
</item><item>
<title>allowedContentTypes improvement</title>
<description>Hi CMF people, I patched the getDefaultAddableTypes method in Products.ATContentTypes, see: https://dev.plone.org/collective/changeset/88621 https://</description>
<pubDate>22 Jun  2009 14:13:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222626</link>
</item><item>
<title>Rename form</title>
<description>Hiya, I recently managed to get quite a lot of work done on my form(lib) based  replacement for a folder_contents view. Thanks go to Yuppie for doin</description>
<pubDate>17 Jun  2009 12:23:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222550</link>
</item><item>
<title>GenericSetup 1.5 release plans?</title>
<description>Is there anything holding up a GenericSetup 1.5 release? I would like to start using it, and as far as I can see there is nothing holding up a relea</description>
<pubDate>17 Jun  2009 00:22:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222534</link>
</item><item>
<title>Help with tests</title>
<description>Hi, I&amp;#039;m having a little trouble with writing the tests for my formlib  folder contents view replacement. The basic tests (based on yuppie&amp;#039;s  doctes</description>
<pubDate>07 Jun  2009 05:39:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222434</link>
</item><item>
<title>Customised permissions</title>
<description>Hi, this should be a no-brainer but apart from a recent discussion on the  death of local permissions I can&amp;#039;t much on it - how do I use custom  per</description>
<pubDate>03 Jun  2009 00:58:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222392</link>
</item><item>
<title>Extending FTI.isConstructionAllowed</title>
<description>I have a use case where I need to put additional restrictions on object creation, in particular I need to restrict the maximum depth of items inside</description>
<pubDate>29 May  2009 04:41:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222359</link>
</item><item>
<title>Zope dependency</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, The CMF eggs, even on trunk, still advertise compatibility with Zope  2.10. I believe we had</description>
<pubDate>26 May  2009 01:19:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222277</link>
</item><item>
<title>Need new release 1.4.5 of GenericSetup</title>
<description>Hi, I patched two things in GenericSetup branch 1.4 (merged on trunk as well), both items have a test. If possible, can you please release a new vers</description>
<pubDate>25 May  2009 04:08:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222247</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMFDefault browser view and tests confusion</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I just fixed an issue that made it impossible to add content to a  CMFBTreeFolder and noticed that the</description>
<pubDate>24 May  2009 03:46:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222233</link>
</item><item>
<title>Workflow transitions automatic state changing</title>
<description>Hi, I have a question about the transitions of a workflow. In ZMI you could choose the option automatic in a transition. Does the option only remove</description>
<pubDate>20 May  2009 01:45:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222177</link>
</item><item>
<title>Allow TAL in DCWorkflow Worklist catalog match configuration</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, Here&amp;#039;s the (probably last) Dieter-inspired feature addition. I have  created a patch that all</description>
<pubDate>19 May  2009 04:48:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222161</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: SVN: Products.GenericSetup/trunk/Products/GenericSetup/browser/addWithPresettings.pt - don&amp;#039;t rely on manage_page_header, manage_form_title and manage_page_footer (in Zope 2.12 they can&amp;#039;t be acquired)</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Yvo Schubbe wrote: &amp;gt; Log message for revision 100073: &amp;gt;  - don&amp;#039;t rely on manage_page_header, manage_fo</description>
<pubDate>18 May  2009 09:19:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222150</link>
</item><item>
<title>Improve encoding/charset detection for FSPageTemplate</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, Continuing the Dieter-inspired fixes, I have created a patch to  improve the encoding/charset</description>
<pubDate>17 May  2009 02:26:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222128</link>
</item><item>
<title>Making it easier to replace MemberData implementation</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, A second code change from Dieter&amp;#039;s extensions for the Haufe publishing  company deals with re</description>
<pubDate>16 May  2009 01:58:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222114</link>
</item><item>
<title>Actions growing link target attributes</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, I am currently going through the CMF code Dieter Maurer wrote during  his time at the Haufe p</description>
<pubDate>15 May  2009 07:31:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222103</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMF Tests: 5 OK, 2 Failed</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Thu May 7 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Fri May 8 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 7 messages: 7 from CMF Test</description>
<pubDate>08 May  2009 05:00:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/221940</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMF Tests: 6 OK</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Fri Apr 24 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Sat Apr 25 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from CMF Test</description>
<pubDate>25 Apr  2009 05:00:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/221624</link>
</item><item>
<title>which CMF for zope2.12</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Just easy_installed the new Zope2.12.a4 release and Products.CMFCore (2.1.2) There is a traceback at s</description>
<pubDate>24 Apr  2009 02:54:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/221575</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMF Tests: 2 OK, 5 Unknown</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Sun Apr 19 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Mon Apr 20 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 7 messages: 7 from CMF Test</description>
<pubDate>20 Apr  2009 05:00:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/221473</link>
</item><item>
<title>Migrating content w/ manage_FTPget and generic setup</title>
<description>Hey Folks, I&amp;#039;m migrating a custom content type from Plone 2.0.5 to Plone 3.2 using manage_FTPget and Generic Setup following the help on http://reino</description>
<pubDate>17 Apr  2009 09:10:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/221393</link>
</item><item>
<title>Best use of source numbers in GS upgrade steps?</title>
<description>Hi, I wonder what the best way is of specifying the source number of a GenericSetup upgrade step. Use case -------- Case in point: Products.Poi, an</description>
<pubDate>16 Apr  2009 05:09:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/221333</link>
</item><item>
<title>IIndexableObjectWrapper</title>
<description>Hi, Plone 3.3&amp;#039;s IIndexableObjectWrapper implementation (in plone.indexer) has a method _getWrappedObject(), to return the object that was wrapped b</description>
<pubDate>05 Apr  2009 03:14:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/220898</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMF Tests: 7 OK</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Thu Apr 2 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Fri Apr 3 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 7 messages: 7 from CMF Test</description>
<pubDate>03 Apr  2009 05:00:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/220836</link>
</item><item>
<title>Proposal: Action expression contexts</title>
<description>Hi, One of the things that we find slightly cumbersome here in our applications is that when defining actions, there&amp;#039;s no easy way to adjust the va</description>
<pubDate>31 Mar  2009 02:10:22 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/220689</link>
</item><item>
<title>Improvements to Discussion Items</title>
<description>Hi, I&amp;#039;ve been working on improving commenting in Plone. I&amp;#039;m not 100% sure we&amp;#039;ll stay with CMFDefault&amp;#039;s idea of Discussion Items forever, but for no</description>
<pubDate>22 Mar  2009 02:45:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/220500</link>
</item><item>
<title>Proposal: MemberDataFactory</title>
<description>Hi, We have quite a lot of copy-and-paste code here in order to support using a custom MemberData class for members in particular sites. The reason</description>
<pubDate>18 Mar  2009 08:20:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/220462</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMF Tests: 2 OK, 3 Failed, 1 Unknown</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Thu Mar 12 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Fri Mar 13 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from CMF Test</description>
<pubDate>13 Mar  2009 05:00:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/220279</link>
</item><item>
<title>[dev] five.localsitemanager: 1.0 branch dependencies</title>
<description>Hi!  setup.py says:     install_requires=[.     &amp;#039;setuptools&amp;#039;,     &amp;#039;zope.component &amp;lt; 3.5dev&amp;#039;,    ], But CHANGES.txt says: * Rewrit</description>
<pubDate>12 Mar  2009 05:06:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/220229</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: SVN: Products.CMFCore/trunk/Products/CMFCore/tests/test_CatalogTool.py Clean out module-scope imports.</title>
<description>Tres Seaver wrote: &amp;gt; Log message for revision 97800: &amp;gt;  Clean out module-scope imports. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Changed: &amp;gt;  U  Products.CMFCore/trunk/Products/CMFCore</description>
<pubDate>10 Mar  2009 09:03:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/220114</link>
</item><item>
<title>IndexableObjectWrapper</title>
<description>Hi, Can anyone tell me if it is possible to register an adapter to provide a different IndexableObjectWrapper class from the stock CMF one? There&amp;#039;s</description>
<pubDate>09 Mar  2009 12:21:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/220044</link>
</item><item>
<title>GenericSetup Zope support</title>
<description>Currently GenericSetup trunk no longer runs on Zope 2.10. If I try to run the tests I get this:  File &amp;quot;/src/Products.GenericSetup/Products/GenericSe</description>
<pubDate>05 Mar  2009 03:19:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/219858</link>
</item><item>
<title>[dev] CMF 2.2 plans?</title>
<description>Hi. Quoting a mail from Jens from September last year: &amp;quot;Is there anything to hold back a CMF 2.2.0 beta at this point?&amp;quot; I have one small todo item</description>
<pubDate>28 Feb  2009 04:55:22 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/219574</link>
</item><item>
<title>Getting started with Unittests for BrowserViews</title>
<description>Hi, I&amp;#039;ve finally got some time to work on my browser view for folders.  Based on Yuppie&amp;#039;s doctest I&amp;#039;ve started writing a unittest testsuite so  tha</description>
<pubDate>24 Feb  2009 08:18:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/219429</link>
</item><item>
<title>[dev] .zexp imports and notifyWorkflowCreated</title>
<description>Hi!  Moving the notifyWorkflowCreated call from _finishConstruction to the IObjectAddedEvent subscriber changed the behavior of .zexp imports: The</description>
<pubDate>18 Feb  2009 04:04:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/219253</link>
</item><item>
<title>GenericSetup test failures on Python 2.5&amp;#039;s tarfile</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Anybody have a clue what changed in the Python 2.5 tarfile module which triggers these failures? &amp;gt; [/h</description>
<pubDate>16 Feb  2009 10:10:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/219209</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: SVN: Products.CMFDefault/trunk/setup.py - dependency cleanup</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Yvo Schubbe wrote: &amp;gt; Log message for revision 96580: &amp;gt;  - dependency cleanup &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Changed: &amp;gt;  U  Pro</description>
<pubDate>16 Feb  2009 08:44:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/219203</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Checkins] SVN: Products.CMFCalendar/trunk/setup.py - dependency cleanup</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I&amp;#039;m wondering, ist it necessary to declare a dependency where we know  that it is a required dependenc</description>
<pubDate>16 Feb  2009 04:08:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/219191</link>
</item><item>
<title>[dev] five.localsitemanager: dependencies</title>
<description>Hi!  I have some trouble using five.localsitemanager in a buildout with Zope2 2.12.dev. This is the error I get:   Error: There is a version confl</description>
<pubDate>12 Feb  2009 05:45:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/219139</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMF Tests: 4 OK</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Sun Feb 8 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Mon Feb 9 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 4 messages: 4 from CMF Test</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2009 04:00:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/219029</link>
</item><item>
<title>Accessing skins objects</title>
<description>Hi, I&amp;#039;ve written a very simple view for concactenating resources such as  CSS or Javascript files to reduce the number of http browser requests:  f</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2009 02:12:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/219027</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMF Tests: 4 OK, 2 Failed</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Thu Feb 5 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Fri Feb 6 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from CMF Test</description>
<pubDate>06 Feb  2009 04:00:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/218964</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMF Tests: 2 OK, 1 Failed, 3 Unknown</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Wed Feb 4 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Thu Feb 5 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from CMF Test</description>
<pubDate>05 Feb  2009 04:00:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/218943</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMF Tests: 4 OK, 1 Failed, 1 Unknown</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Mon Feb 2 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Tue Feb 3 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from CMF Test</description>
<pubDate>03 Feb  2009 04:00:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/218919</link>
</item><item>
<title>Weird catalog behaviour</title>
<description>Hi, is there any reason why a portal_catalog.searchResults() returns an  empty result set when called on the command line but not from within  ZMI?</description>
<pubDate>28 Jan  2009 06:33:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/218723</link>
</item><item>
<title>zc.formlib and content types</title>
<description>Hi, I&amp;#039;ve been playing with zc.formlib and five to create some simple content types - not exactly ahead of the curve, I know! I want to create a mul</description>
<pubDate>26 Jan  2009 06:41:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/218686</link>
</item><item>
<title>[dev] type info: content_icon vs. icon_expr property</title>
<description>Hi!  I just noticed this checkin: http://svn.zope.org/?rev=94014&amp;amp;view=rev And I&amp;#039;m a bit confused. What&amp;#039;s the plan? Maintaining redundant informatio</description>
<pubDate>21 Jan  2009 13:28:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/218623</link>
</item><item>
<title>Running functional tests in a buildout environment</title>
<description>Hi, I&amp;#039;ve been struggling (and pestering Jens) with running the test on my  formlib-based contents view for folders. It seems that CMFDefault/ brows</description>
<pubDate>12 Jan  2009 08:54:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/218450</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: SVN: Products.CMFDefault/trunk/Products/CMFDefault/__init__.py Move clashing imports into body of initialize().</title>
<description>Hi Tres!  Tres Seaver wrote: &amp;gt; Log message for revision 94389: &amp;gt;  Move clashing imports into body of initialize(). &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Changed: &amp;gt;  U  Products.CM</description>
<pubDate>28 Dec  2008 04:28:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/218351</link>
</item><item>
<title>Cleaning up imports, question about odd &amp;quot;feature&amp;quot;</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 After spelunking through the maze of imports in the Zope2 core indirected throught the Globals module,</description>
<pubDate>27 Dec  2008 10:45:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/218342</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMFCatalogAware.dispatchToOpaqueItems madness</title>
<description>I really don&amp;#039;t understand this code, so maybe I&amp;#039;m missing something here, but anyone know wtf the opaqueItem code does in CMFCore.CMFCatalogAware?! W</description>
<pubDate>18 Dec  2008 13:54:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/218270</link>
</item><item>
<title>Charsets</title>
<description>Hi, I&amp;#039;m struggling with the way formlib forms handle decoding from forms.  It looks like this gets set in BrowserView using an  IUserPreferredChars</description>
<pubDate>13 Dec  2008 09:40:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/218198</link>
</item><item>
<title>GenericSetup 1.5</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I would like to get a 1.5 release of GenericSetup out over the holidays. Here is what I have on the ro</description>
<pubDate>11 Dec  2008 09:18:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/218125</link>
</item><item>
<title>Customising types with add views</title>
<description>Hi, Currently, we have this situation (on trunk):  - Add views are looked up by evaluating the FTI add_view_expr  - The default/conventional add_</description>
<pubDate>08 Dec  2008 07:20:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/218023</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMF add views and &amp;lt;browser:page /&amp;gt;</title>
<description>Hi, Thanks to yuppie, trunk now allows us to use the ++add++&amp;lt;type&amp;gt; traverser, which will look up an add view as an adapter on (context, request, ft</description>
<pubDate>08 Dec  2008 07:00:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/218022</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMF Tests: 4 OK, 2 Failed</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Fri Dec 5 12:00:00 2008 UTC to Sat Dec 6 12:00:00 2008 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from CMF Test</description>
<pubDate>06 Dec  2008 04:00:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/218000</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMF Tests: 4 OK, 2 Unknown</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Thu Dec 4 12:00:00 2008 UTC to Fri Dec 5 12:00:00 2008 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from CMF Test</description>
<pubDate>05 Dec  2008 04:00:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/217994</link>
</item><item>
<title>adding &amp;#039;context&amp;#039; as an alias for &amp;#039;object&amp;#039; in action expressions</title>
<description>Does anyone have an objection to me adding &amp;#039;context&amp;#039; as an alias for  &amp;#039;object&amp;#039; in the expression context that is built when executing CMF  action ex</description>
<pubDate>29 Nov  2008 14:26:49 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/217932</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMF write performance as poor as Plone?</title>
<description>Hi there, we are currently doing consultancy work for a bigger Zope-based CMS project (lotes of users, lots of concurrent editors/write). Plone and</description>
<pubDate>20 Nov  2008 22:31:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/217847</link>
</item><item>
<title>[dev] five.localsitemanager: site manager names</title>
<description>Hi!  Trying to clean up site creation in CMF, I noticed this issue: zope.app.component uses a hardcoded &amp;#039;++etc++site&amp;#039; as name, but five.localsitema</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2008 07:22:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/217800</link>
</item><item>
<title>[dev] Should portal_setup be registered as utility?</title>
<description>Hi!  CMFDefault registers portal_setup as utility. Some code in CMF depends on that. Plone doesn&amp;#039;t doesn&amp;#039;t register portal_setup as utility: http:/</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2008 07:17:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/217799</link>
</item><item>
<title>Registering CMF Content Types in ZCML</title>
<description>The CMF 2.1 change logs indicate it&amp;#039;s possible to register content in ZCML but I&amp;#039;m not having any luck finding any examples or documentation. I know I</description>
<pubDate>11 Nov  2008 14:46:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/217742</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMF Tests: No messages</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Mon Nov 10 12:00:00 2008 UTC to Tue Nov 11 12:00:00 2008 UTC. There were no messages. _____________</description>
<pubDate>11 Nov  2008 04:00:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/217728</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMF Tests:</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Sun Nov 9 12:00:00 2008 UTC to Mon Nov 10 12:00:00 2008 UTC. There were no messages. _____________</description>
<pubDate>10 Nov  2008 04:00:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/217703</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMF Tests: 6 OK</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Wed Nov 5 12:00:00 2008 UTC to Thu Nov 6 12:00:00 2008 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from CMF Test</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2008 04:00:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/217655</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMF Tests: 10 OK</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Wed Oct 29 12:00:00 2008 UTC to Thu Oct 30 12:00:00 2008 UTC. There were 10 messages: 10 from CMF Te</description>
<pubDate>30 Oct  2008 05:00:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/217579</link>
</item><item>
<title>Missing Event Handler for CMFCatalogAware</title>
<description>Hi, I noticed in an object derived from CMFCatalogAware that it wasn&amp;#039;t  being removed from the catalogue upon deletion. Looking at the event  handl</description>
<pubDate>29 Oct  2008 06:08:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/217570</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMF Tests: 9 OK, 1 Unknown</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Mon Oct 27 12:00:00 2008 UTC to Tue Oct 28 12:00:00 2008 UTC. There were 10 messages: 10 from CMF Te</description>
<pubDate>28 Oct  2008 05:00:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/217566</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMF Tests: 8 OK, 1 Failed</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Sun Oct 26 12:00:00 2008 UTC to Mon Oct 27 12:00:00 2008 UTC. There were 9 messages: 9 from CMF Test</description>
<pubDate>27 Oct  2008 05:00:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/217534</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMF Tests: 6 OK</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Fri Oct 17 11:00:00 2008 UTC to Sat Oct 18 11:00:00 2008 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from CMF Test</description>
<pubDate>18 Oct  2008 04:00:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/217401</link>
</item><item>
<title>Debugging GenericSetup?</title>
<description>Hi there, I am currently working on an extension profile for a Plone content-type with two content-types. Right now I am in the situation where the</description>
<pubDate>18 Oct  2008 01:12:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/217398</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMF Tests: 6 OK, 3 Failed</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Mon Oct 13 11:00:00 2008 UTC to Tue Oct 14 11:00:00 2008 UTC. There were 9 messages: 9 from CMF Test</description>
<pubDate>14 Oct  2008 04:00:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/217288</link>
</item><item>
<title>MembershipTool: Using traversal to look up the Members folder?</title>
<description>Hi, today I&amp;#039;m facing the situation where I want to support a Members folder (rare these days) but this folder should be deeper down in the site (very</description>
<pubDate>08 Oct  2008 04:36:22 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/217205</link>
</item><item>
<title>Pure CSS for main template</title>
<description>Hi, now that I&amp;#039;ve got my own branch I&amp;#039;ve finally made a start on a pure  CSS version of main_template.pr for CMFDefault. The idea is not to do  a r</description>
<pubDate>05 Oct  2008 11:06:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/217166</link>
</item><item>
<title>portal_fiveactions</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Is anyone actually using the portal_fiveactions tool and the supposed  bridging between Z3 menus and C</description>
<pubDate>04 Oct  2008 07:34:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/217154</link>
</item><item>
<title>IMember: does it exist?</title>
<description>In CMFCore/interfaces/_tools.py I found several references to an IMember interface: class IMemberDataTool(Interface):   ...   def wrapUser(user):</description>
<pubDate>02 Oct  2008 11:32:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/217135</link>
</item><item>
<title>actions tool import/export inconsistencies</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 An open Launchpad issue had me take a look at the import/export  machinery for the actions tool and ac</description>
<pubDate>24 Sep  2008 14:00:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/217066</link>
</item><item>
<title>using zope.dublincore in CMFCore</title>
<description>Currently CMFCore and zope.dublincore duplicate some of the DC interfaces. zope.dublincore even has an ICMFDublinCore interface explicitly dublicing C</description>
<pubDate>23 Sep  2008 08:01:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/217035</link>
</item><item>
<title>[dev] &amp;#039;add&amp;#039; actions and views - a proposal</title>
<description>Hi!  Thanks for all the feedback to my previous mails. I hope I now have a good solution.  Context ------- Portal types are created TTW by configu</description>
<pubDate>19 Sep  2008 05:12:55 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/216974</link>
</item><item>
<title>back-porting a GenericSetup fix to the 1.4 branch</title>
<description>hi all, currently, on the 1.4 branch of GenericSetup, there is what i consider to be a bug in the component registry import code. the issue is that</description>
<pubDate>16 Sep  2008 13:53:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/216893</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMF Tests: 7 OK, 2 Failed</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Sat Sep 13 11:00:00 2008 UTC to Sun Sep 14 11:00:00 2008 UTC. There were 9 messages: 9 from CMF Test</description>
<pubDate>14 Sep  2008 04:00:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/216811</link>
</item><item>
<title>[dev] add view traversal</title>
<description>Hi!  This mail has been lying around for a while because I&amp;#039;m not sure it&amp;#039;s the right way to start the discussion. But now I&amp;#039;ll give it a try. Maybe</description>
<pubDate>14 Sep  2008 03:26:16 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/216809</link>
</item><item>
<title>LP #254576: CMFCore.exportimport.content doesn&amp;#039;t index results of .properties</title>
<description>&amp;gt;From https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/+bug/254576:   In CMFCore/exportimport/content.py:201, the title and description   for the newly create</description>
<pubDate>13 Sep  2008 09:33:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/216804</link>
</item><item>
<title>Formlib based view of folder contents</title>
<description>Hi, currently sitting with Tres and Jens in Saarbrücken working on a  formlib based view of folder_contents and we&amp;#039;re hitting some stuff  that&amp;#039;s be</description>
<pubDate>13 Sep  2008 06:51:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/216802</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMFActionIcons vs. new-style actions</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Today I was looking at the CMFActionIcons product and wondered about a  few things. First of all, ther</description>
<pubDate>13 Sep  2008 06:28:16 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/216800</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMF 2.2.0 beta</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Is there anything to hold back a CMF 2.2.0 beta at this point? jens  -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Ve</description>
<pubDate>11 Sep  2008 08:38:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/216767</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMFDefault 2.1.2-beta egg does not install</title>
<description>While working on plonenext I get an error when trying to install the Products.CMFDefault egg. This is the buildout -vv output: Getting required &amp;#039;Prod</description>
<pubDate>07 Sep  2008 22:03:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/216697</link>
</item><item>
<title>Bug in FSPythonScript?</title>
<description>In CMFCore.FSPythonScript.py around line 170 in the _exec method, a volatile attribute is checked to see if a script has been compiled properly. The l</description>
<pubDate>04 Sep  2008 10:56:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/216670</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMF Tests: 9 OK</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Fri Aug 29 11:00:00 2008 UTC to Sat Aug 30 11:00:00 2008 UTC. There were 9 messages: 9 from CMF Test</description>
<pubDate>30 Aug  2008 04:00:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/216514</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMF Tests: 3 OK, 4 Failed, 2 Unknown</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Wed Aug 27 11:00:00 2008 UTC to Thu Aug 28 11:00:00 2008 UTC. There were 9 messages: 9 from CMF Test</description>
<pubDate>28 Aug  2008 04:00:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/216449</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMF Tests: 8 OK, 1 Unknown</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Thu Aug 14 11:00:00 2008 UTC to Fri Aug 15 11:00:00 2008 UTC. There were 9 messages: 9 from CMF Test</description>
<pubDate>15 Aug  2008 04:00:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/216259</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMF Tests: 8 OK, 1 Failed</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Wed Aug 13 11:00:00 2008 UTC to Thu Aug 14 11:00:00 2008 UTC. There were 9 messages: 9 from CMF Test</description>
<pubDate>14 Aug  2008 04:00:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/216237</link>
</item><item>
<title>&amp;lt;genericsetup:upgradeDepends&amp;gt;</title>
<description>hi all, i&amp;#039;ve got a GenericSetup branch called &amp;#039;ra-depends-tag&amp;#039; with a working implementation of a &amp;lt;genericsetup:upgradeDepends&amp;gt; ZCML tag. this tag</description>
<pubDate>07 Aug  2008 11:26:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/216137</link>
</item><item>
<title>[dev] more add menu changes</title>
<description>Hi!  We now have to support two ways to add content:  1.) oldstyle (no add view specified) ------------------------------------ The addable types a</description>
<pubDate>07 Aug  2008 03:26:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/216130</link>
</item><item>
<title>Locales in CMFDefault</title>
<description>Hi, In CMFDefault there is the locales/cmf_default.pot file but no .po files. Also, there is no domain mentioned in that pot file - it should be &amp;#039;cm</description>
<pubDate>06 Aug  2008 07:32:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/216115</link>
</item><item>
<title>Generic Setup metadata.xml</title>
<description>Hi, When providing a metadata.xml file, GenericSetup&amp;#039;s registerProfile directive crashes if &amp;lt;dependencies&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/dependencies&amp;gt; is provided as empty tag wi</description>
<pubDate>06 Aug  2008 03:44:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/216107</link>
</item><item>
<title>discussion behaviour in CMFDefault</title>
<description>Currently CMFDefault does allow you to see or even retrieve information from an object which does not have discussion allowed. This means that it is n</description>
<pubDate>05 Aug  2008 04:07:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/216083</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
