<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Zope | CMF</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>04 Jul  2009 09:01:35 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>Re: Rename form</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1  On Jun 18, 2009, at 13:35 , Charlie Clark wrote: &amp;gt; Renaming via &amp;gt; folders is presumably a continuatio</description>
<pubDate>02 Jul  2009 03:40:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222768</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMF Tests: 7 OK</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Mon Jun 29 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Tue Jun 30 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 7 messages: 7 from CMF Test</description>
<pubDate>30 Jun  2009 05:00:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222734</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMF Tests: 7 OK</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Sun Jun 28 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Mon Jun 29 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 7 messages: 7 from CMF Test</description>
<pubDate>29 Jun  2009 05:00:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222725</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [CMF 2.1] Opaque items</title>
<description>Hi!  Andreas Jung wrote: &amp;gt; I am currently migrating our CMS from CMF 1.X to CMF 2.1. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; The following error is raised because the original content</description>
<pubDate>29 Jun  2009 01:52:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222718</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [CMF 2.1] Opaque items</title>
<description>On 29.06.09 08:43, David Glick wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; From &amp;gt; http://dev.plone.org/old/plone/browser/plone.app.discussion/trunk/plone/app/discussion/comment.py</description>
<pubDate>28 Jun  2009 23:55:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222717</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [CMF 2.1] Opaque items</title>
<description>On Jun 28, 2009, at 11:40 PM, Andreas Jung wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Hi there, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I am currently migrating our CMS from CMF 1.X to CMF 2.1. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; The following error</description>
<pubDate>28 Jun  2009 23:43:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222716</link>
</item><item>
<title>[CMF 2.1] Opaque items</title>
<description>Hi there, I am currently migrating our CMS from CMF 1.X to CMF 2.1. The following error is raised because the original content classes are not deriv</description>
<pubDate>28 Jun  2009 23:40:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222715</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: allowedContentTypes improvement</title>
<description>Am 28.06.2009, 09:46 Uhr, schrieb Vincent Fretin  &amp;lt;vincent.fretin@gmail.com&amp;gt;: &amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt; I patched Products.CMFCore trunk 2.2 as well. I hope I didn&amp;#039;t</description>
<pubDate>28 Jun  2009 05:35:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222713</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMF Tests: 7 OK</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Sat Jun 27 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Sun Jun 28 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 7 messages: 7 from CMF Test</description>
<pubDate>28 Jun  2009 05:00:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222712</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: allowedContentTypes improvement</title>
<description>Hi, I patched Products.CMFCore trunk 2.2 as well. I hope I didn&amp;#039;t break anything. Vincent Fretin  On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 11:13 PM, Vincent Fretin</description>
<pubDate>28 Jun  2009 00:46:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222710</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMF Tests: 7 OK</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Fri Jun 26 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Sat Jun 27 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 7 messages: 7 from CMF Test</description>
<pubDate>27 Jun  2009 05:00:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222704</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMF Tests: 7 OK</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Thu Jun 25 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Fri Jun 26 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 7 messages: 7 from CMF Test</description>
<pubDate>26 Jun  2009 05:00:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222694</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: GenericSetup 1.5 release plans?</title>
<description>Hi!  Tres Seaver wrote: &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m fine with releasing a 1.5.0b1 as soon as we establish the &amp;quot;correct&amp;quot; &amp;gt; way to test the checkout: at the moment, I have</description>
<pubDate>26 Jun  2009 02:36:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222689</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: GenericSetup proposal: upgrade profiles</title>
<description>Hi Rob, Thanks for the feedback! Rob Miller, on 2009-06-24: &amp;gt; i&amp;#039;m not actively working on GenericSetup these days, so i don&amp;#039;t know that my &amp;gt; opinio</description>
<pubDate>25 Jun  2009 15:17:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222685</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMF Tests: 7 OK</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Wed Jun 24 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Thu Jun 25 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 7 messages: 7 from CMF Test</description>
<pubDate>25 Jun  2009 05:00:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222683</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: GenericSetup proposal: upgrade profiles</title>
<description>i&amp;#039;m not actively working on GenericSetup these days, so i don&amp;#039;t know that my opinion counts for much, but i&amp;#039;m -1 on this. to me it seems to introduc</description>
<pubDate>24 Jun  2009 13:06:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222669</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: GenericSetup proposal: upgrade profiles</title>
<description>Hi Maurits, I have a product where I use an extension profile and 2 other extension profiles used with upgradeStep. For my use case, when GenericSetu</description>
<pubDate>24 Jun  2009 10:48:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222666</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMF Tests: 7 OK</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Tue Jun 23 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Wed Jun 24 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 7 messages: 7 from CMF Test</description>
<pubDate>24 Jun  2009 05:00:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222653</link>
</item><item>
<title>GenericSetup proposal: upgrade profiles</title>
<description>Hi, Products.GenericSetup/interfaces.py says: BASE, EXTENSION = 1, 2 I propose adding another one: UPGRADE = 3 and possibly a fourth one: UNINSTALL</description>
<pubDate>23 Jun  2009 17:42:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222644</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMF Tests: No messages</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Mon Jun 22 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Tue Jun 23 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were no messages. _____________</description>
<pubDate>23 Jun  2009 05:00:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222631</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [GenericSetup] Extension profile re-installing base profile</title>
<description>Andreas Jung, on 2009-06-23: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; We are currently migration from Zope 2.8/CMF 1.X to Zope 2.11/CMF 2.1. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I have a minimal base profile and two almo</description>
<pubDate>23 Jun  2009 00:04:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222629</link>
</item><item>
<title>[GenericSetup] Extension profile re-installing base profile</title>
<description>We are currently migration from Zope 2.8/CMF 1.X to Zope 2.11/CMF 2.1. I have a minimal base profile and two almost identical extension profiles for</description>
<pubDate>22 Jun  2009 22:48:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222628</link>
</item><item>
<title>allowedContentTypes improvement</title>
<description>Hi CMF people, I patched the getDefaultAddableTypes method in Products.ATContentTypes, see: https://dev.plone.org/collective/changeset/88621 https://</description>
<pubDate>22 Jun  2009 14:13:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222626</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMF Tests: 7 OK</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Sun Jun 21 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Mon Jun 22 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 7 messages: 7 from CMF Test</description>
<pubDate>22 Jun  2009 05:00:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222612</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMF Tests: 7 OK</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Sat Jun 20 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Sun Jun 21 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 7 messages: 7 from CMF Test</description>
<pubDate>21 Jun  2009 05:00:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222594</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Need new release 1.4.5 of GenericSetup</title>
<description>Thank you very much Tres! On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 8:25 PM, Tres Seaver&amp;lt;tseaver@palladion.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- &amp;gt; Hash: SHA</description>
<pubDate>20 Jun  2009 11:48:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222591</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Need new release 1.4.5 of GenericSetup</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Vincent Fretin wrote: &amp;gt; So anybody have the time to do a new release? I just released GS 1.4.5 to PyP</description>
<pubDate>20 Jun  2009 11:25:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222590</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMF Tests: 7 OK</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Fri Jun 19 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Sat Jun 20 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 7 messages: 7 from CMF Test</description>
<pubDate>20 Jun  2009 05:00:16 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222587</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Need new release 1.4.5 of GenericSetup</title>
<description>On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Vincent Fretin&amp;lt;vincent.fretin@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Wichert Akkerman &amp;lt;wichert@wiggy.ne</description>
<pubDate>20 Jun  2009 02:36:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222586</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMF Tests: 7 OK</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Thu Jun 18 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Fri Jun 19 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 7 messages: 7 from CMF Test</description>
<pubDate>19 Jun  2009 05:00:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222572</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Rename form</title>
<description>Am 18.06.2009, 12:10 Uhr, schrieb Raphael Ritz  &amp;lt;r.ritz@biologie.hu-berlin.de&amp;gt;: &amp;gt; FWIW: I find it quite natural wanting to rename &amp;quot;this specific thi</description>
<pubDate>18 Jun  2009 05:35:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222558</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMF Tests: 7 OK</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Wed Jun 17 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Thu Jun 18 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 7 messages: 7 from CMF Test</description>
<pubDate>18 Jun  2009 05:00:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222557</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Rename form</title>
<description>Charlie Clark wrote: &amp;gt; Hiya, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I recently managed to get quite a lot of work done on my form(lib) based  &amp;gt; replacement for a folder_contents view.</description>
<pubDate>18 Jun  2009 03:10:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222554</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: GenericSetup 1.5 release plans?</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Wichert Akkerman wrote: &amp;gt; Is there anything holding up a GenericSetup 1.5 release? I would like to &amp;gt; s</description>
<pubDate>17 Jun  2009 15:04:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222551</link>
</item><item>
<title>Rename form</title>
<description>Hiya, I recently managed to get quite a lot of work done on my form(lib) based  replacement for a folder_contents view. Thanks go to Yuppie for doin</description>
<pubDate>17 Jun  2009 12:23:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222550</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMF Tests: 7 OK</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Tue Jun 16 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Wed Jun 17 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 7 messages: 7 from CMF Test</description>
<pubDate>17 Jun  2009 05:00:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222540</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: GenericSetup 1.5 release plans?</title>
<description>Wichert Akkerman wrote: &amp;gt; Is there anything holding up a GenericSetup 1.5 release? I would like to &amp;gt; start using it, and as far as I can see there is</description>
<pubDate>17 Jun  2009 03:39:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222537</link>
</item><item>
<title>GenericSetup 1.5 release plans?</title>
<description>Is there anything holding up a GenericSetup 1.5 release? I would like to start using it, and as far as I can see there is nothing holding up a relea</description>
<pubDate>17 Jun  2009 00:22:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222534</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMF Tests: 7 OK</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Mon Jun 15 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Tue Jun 16 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 7 messages: 7 from CMF Test</description>
<pubDate>16 Jun  2009 05:00:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222522</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMF Tests: 7 OK</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Sun Jun 14 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Mon Jun 15 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 7 messages: 7 from CMF Test</description>
<pubDate>15 Jun  2009 05:00:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222511</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMF Tests: 7 OK</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Sat Jun 13 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Sun Jun 14 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 7 messages: 7 from CMF Test</description>
<pubDate>14 Jun  2009 05:00:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222507</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMF Tests: 7 OK</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Fri Jun 12 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Sat Jun 13 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 7 messages: 7 from CMF Test</description>
<pubDate>13 Jun  2009 05:00:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222502</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMF Tests: 7 OK</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Thu Jun 11 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Fri Jun 12 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 7 messages: 7 from CMF Test</description>
<pubDate>12 Jun  2009 05:00:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222493</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMF Tests: 7 OK</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Wed Jun 10 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Thu Jun 11 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 7 messages: 7 from CMF Test</description>
<pubDate>11 Jun  2009 05:00:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222477</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMF Tests: 7 OK</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Tue Jun 9 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Wed Jun 10 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 7 messages: 7 from CMF Test</description>
<pubDate>10 Jun  2009 05:00:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222462</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMF Tests: 7 OK</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Mon Jun 8 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Tue Jun 9 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 7 messages: 7 from CMF Test</description>
<pubDate>09 Jun  2009 05:00:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222447</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMF Tests: 7 OK</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Sun Jun 7 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Mon Jun 8 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 7 messages: 7 from CMF Test</description>
<pubDate>08 Jun  2009 05:00:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222444</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Help with tests</title>
<description>Am 07.06.2009 um 15:26 schrieb Charlie Clark: &amp;gt; Hi Tres, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;ve tried that but am not having much success:  Scratch that - invoking an unrestricte</description>
<pubDate>07 Jun  2009 06:29:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222438</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Help with tests</title>
<description>Am 07.06.2009 um 15:07 schrieb Tres Seaver: &amp;gt; Do you need to set up a security manager with &amp;#039;user_foo&amp;#039;, grep for &amp;gt; &amp;#039;newSecurityManager&amp;#039; in other CMF</description>
<pubDate>07 Jun  2009 06:26:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222437</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Help with tests</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Charlie Clark wrote: &amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m having a little trouble with writing the tests for my formlib  &amp;gt; f</description>
<pubDate>07 Jun  2009 06:07:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222435</link>
</item><item>
<title>Help with tests</title>
<description>Hi, I&amp;#039;m having a little trouble with writing the tests for my formlib  folder contents view replacement. The basic tests (based on yuppie&amp;#039;s  doctes</description>
<pubDate>07 Jun  2009 05:39:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222434</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMF Tests: 7 OK</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Sat Jun 6 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Sun Jun 7 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 7 messages: 7 from CMF Test</description>
<pubDate>07 Jun  2009 05:00:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222433</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMF Tests: 7 OK</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Fri Jun 5 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Sat Jun 6 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 7 messages: 7 from CMF Test</description>
<pubDate>06 Jun  2009 05:00:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222429</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMF Tests: 7 OK</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Thu Jun 4 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Fri Jun 5 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 7 messages: 7 from CMF Test</description>
<pubDate>05 Jun  2009 05:00:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222417</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Extending FTI.isConstructionAllowed</title>
<description>Hi Wichert!  Wichert Akkerman wrote: &amp;gt; Previously yuppie wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; 2.) The distinction between allowType() and isConstructionAllowed() was &amp;gt;&amp;gt; clear</description>
<pubDate>04 Jun  2009 05:58:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222410</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMF Tests: 7 OK</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Wed Jun 3 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Thu Jun 4 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 7 messages: 7 from CMF Test</description>
<pubDate>04 Jun  2009 05:00:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222409</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Extending FTI.isConstructionAllowed</title>
<description>Previously yuppie wrote: &amp;gt; After (re)reading all the comments and having a closer look at the code &amp;gt; I came to these conclusions: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; 1.) CMF 2.1 ch</description>
<pubDate>04 Jun  2009 00:34:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222408</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Customised permissions</title>
<description>Am 03.06.2009 um 15:47 schrieb Martin Aspeli: &amp;gt; That code is, but not the whole functionality. The functionality to &amp;gt; register Zope 2 style permissio</description>
<pubDate>03 Jun  2009 07:56:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222405</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Customised permissions</title>
<description>Charlie Clark wrote: &amp;gt; Am 03.06.2009 um 13:05 schrieb Wichert Akkerman: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Not if you use collective.autopermission. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; In which it states: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>03 Jun  2009 06:47:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222404</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Extending FTI.isConstructionAllowed</title>
<description>Hi Wichert!  Wichert Akkerman wrote: &amp;gt; I have a use case where I need to put additional restrictions on object &amp;gt; creation, in particular I need to r</description>
<pubDate>03 Jun  2009 06:35:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222403</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMF Tests: 7 OK</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Tue Jun 2 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Wed Jun 3 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 7 messages: 7 from CMF Test</description>
<pubDate>03 Jun  2009 05:00:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222401</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Customised permissions</title>
<description>Am 03.06.2009 um 13:05 schrieb Wichert Akkerman: &amp;gt; Not if you use collective.autopermission. In which it states: # This is borrowed from Products.C</description>
<pubDate>03 Jun  2009 04:33:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222400</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Customised permissions</title>
<description>Previously Charlie Clark wrote: &amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; this should be a no-brainer but apart from a recent discussion on the  &amp;gt; death of local permissions I can&amp;#039;</description>
<pubDate>03 Jun  2009 04:05:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222397</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Extending FTI.isConstructionAllowed</title>
<description>Am 03.06.2009 um 10:12 schrieb Wichert Akkerman: &amp;gt; There are two reasons I want to block creation of the object:  &amp;gt; performance, and user interface.</description>
<pubDate>03 Jun  2009 01:29:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222396</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Extending FTI.isConstructionAllowed</title>
<description>On 6/3/09 10:08 AM, Charlie Clark wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Am 02.06.2009 um 14:47 schrieb Wichert Akkerman: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; That assumes the object has already been constructe</description>
<pubDate>03 Jun  2009 01:12:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222395</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Extending FTI.isConstructionAllowed</title>
<description>Am 02.06.2009 um 14:47 schrieb Wichert Akkerman: &amp;gt; That assumes the object has already been constructed and you&amp;#039;re only &amp;gt; testing constraints for add</description>
<pubDate>03 Jun  2009 01:08:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222394</link>
</item><item>
<title>Customised permissions</title>
<description>Hi, this should be a no-brainer but apart from a recent discussion on the  death of local permissions I can&amp;#039;t much on it - how do I use custom  per</description>
<pubDate>03 Jun  2009 00:58:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222392</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Extending FTI.isConstructionAllowed</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Tres Seaver wrote: &amp;gt; Wichert Akkerman wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Previously Tres Seaver wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED</description>
<pubDate>02 Jun  2009 09:51:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222385</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Extending FTI.isConstructionAllowed</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Wichert Akkerman wrote: &amp;gt; Previously Tres Seaver wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Hash:</description>
<pubDate>02 Jun  2009 09:35:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222384</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Extending FTI.isConstructionAllowed</title>
<description>Previously yuppie wrote: &amp;gt; Wichert Akkerman wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Previously yuppie wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; A CMF specific precondition would look up type restrictions in th</description>
<pubDate>02 Jun  2009 05:47:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222379</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Extending FTI.isConstructionAllowed</title>
<description>Wichert Akkerman wrote: &amp;gt; Previously yuppie wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; A CMF specific precondition would look up type restrictions in the fti &amp;gt;&amp;gt; of the container. &amp;gt;&amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>02 Jun  2009 05:23:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222378</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMF Tests: 7 OK</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Mon Jun 1 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Tue Jun 2 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 7 messages: 7 from CMF Test</description>
<pubDate>02 Jun  2009 05:00:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222377</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Extending FTI.isConstructionAllowed</title>
<description>Previously Wichert Akkerman wrote: &amp;gt; I have a use case where I need to put additional restrictions on object &amp;gt; creation, in particular I need to rest</description>
<pubDate>02 Jun  2009 04:59:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222376</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Extending FTI.isConstructionAllowed</title>
<description>Previously yuppie wrote: &amp;gt; It&amp;#039;s no hook for adding restrictions, but it&amp;#039;s a hook for using &amp;gt; different implementations. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; and does not support p</description>
<pubDate>02 Jun  2009 04:57:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222375</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Extending FTI.isConstructionAllowed</title>
<description>Previously Tres Seaver wrote: &amp;gt; -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- &amp;gt; Hash: SHA1 &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Wichert Akkerman wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I have a use case where I need to put</description>
<pubDate>02 Jun  2009 04:21:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222374</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMF Tests: 7 OK</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Sun May 31 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Mon Jun 1 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 7 messages: 7 from CMF Test</description>
<pubDate>01 Jun  2009 05:00:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222370</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMF Tests: 7 OK</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Sat May 30 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Sun May 31 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 7 messages: 7 from CMF Test</description>
<pubDate>31 May  2009 05:00:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222368</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMF Tests: 7 OK</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Fri May 29 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Sat May 30 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 7 messages: 7 from CMF Test</description>
<pubDate>30 May  2009 05:00:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222366</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Extending FTI.isConstructionAllowed</title>
<description>Wichert Akkerman wrote: &amp;gt; Previously yuppie wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Wichert Akkerman wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; I have a use case where I need to put additional restrictions on obj</description>
<pubDate>29 May  2009 08:04:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222365</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Extending FTI.isConstructionAllowed</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Wichert Akkerman wrote: &amp;gt; I have a use case where I need to put additional restrictions on object &amp;gt; cr</description>
<pubDate>29 May  2009 06:56:16 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222364</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Extending FTI.isConstructionAllowed</title>
<description>Previously yuppie wrote: &amp;gt; Wichert Akkerman wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I have a use case where I need to put additional restrictions on object &amp;gt; &amp;gt; creation, in parti</description>
<pubDate>29 May  2009 06:50:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222363</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Extending FTI.isConstructionAllowed</title>
<description>Wichert Akkerman wrote: &amp;gt; I have a use case where I need to put additional restrictions on object &amp;gt; creation, in particular I need to restrict the ma</description>
<pubDate>29 May  2009 06:21:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222362</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMF Tests: 7 OK</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Thu May 28 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Fri May 29 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 7 messages: 7 from CMF Test</description>
<pubDate>29 May  2009 05:00:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222360</link>
</item><item>
<title>Extending FTI.isConstructionAllowed</title>
<description>I have a use case where I need to put additional restrictions on object creation, in particular I need to restrict the maximum depth of items inside</description>
<pubDate>29 May  2009 04:41:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222359</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMF Tests: 7 OK</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Wed May 27 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Thu May 28 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 7 messages: 7 from CMF Test</description>
<pubDate>28 May  2009 05:00:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222325</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMF Tests: 7 OK</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Tue May 26 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Wed May 27 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 7 messages: 7 from CMF Test</description>
<pubDate>27 May  2009 05:00:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222307</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMF Tests: 7 OK</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Mon May 25 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Tue May 26 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 7 messages: 7 from CMF Test</description>
<pubDate>26 May  2009 05:00:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222289</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: CMFDefault browser view and tests confusion</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1  On May 24, 2009, at 14:20 , Charlie Clark wrote: &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m responsible for part of the mess - I replicate</description>
<pubDate>26 May  2009 04:53:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222288</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Zope dependency</title>
<description>Previously Jens Vagelpohl wrote: &amp;gt; However, I&amp;#039;d still like to bring up the question of officially  &amp;gt; supported Zope releases for CMF 2.2.x. Speaking</description>
<pubDate>26 May  2009 02:49:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222283</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Zope dependency</title>
<description>Previously Jens Vagelpohl wrote: &amp;gt; However, I&amp;#039;d still like to bring up the question of officially  &amp;gt; supported Zope releases for CMF 2.2.x. Speaking</description>
<pubDate>26 May  2009 02:49:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222284</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Zope dependency</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1  On May 26, 2009, at 11:20 , Hanno Schlichting wrote: &amp;gt; Why doesn&amp;#039;t that generate test failures? We ar</description>
<pubDate>26 May  2009 02:45:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222282</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Zope dependency</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1  On May 26, 2009, at 11:20 , Hanno Schlichting wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m guessing you are not aware that there alr</description>
<pubDate>26 May  2009 02:29:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222281</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Zope dependency</title>
<description>Jens Vagelpohl wrote: &amp;gt; On May 26, 2009, at 10:21 , Wichert Akkerman wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Previously Jens Vagelpohl wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; The CMF eggs, even on trunk, still</description>
<pubDate>26 May  2009 02:20:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222280</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Zope dependency</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1  On May 26, 2009, at 10:21 , Wichert Akkerman wrote: &amp;gt; Previously Jens Vagelpohl wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; The CMF egg</description>
<pubDate>26 May  2009 01:57:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222279</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Zope dependency</title>
<description>Previously Jens Vagelpohl wrote: &amp;gt; -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- &amp;gt; Hash: SHA1 &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Hi all, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; The CMF eggs, even on trunk, still advertise comp</description>
<pubDate>26 May  2009 01:21:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222278</link>
</item><item>
<title>Zope dependency</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, The CMF eggs, even on trunk, still advertise compatibility with Zope  2.10. I believe we had</description>
<pubDate>26 May  2009 01:19:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222277</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Need new release 1.4.5 of GenericSetup</title>
<description>On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Wichert Akkerman &amp;lt;wichert@wiggy.net&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Previously Vincent Fretin wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; I patched two things in G</description>
<pubDate>25 May  2009 06:12:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222252</link>
</item><item>
<title>CMF Tests: 7 OK</title>
<description>Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Sun May 24 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Mon May 25 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 7 messages: 7 from CMF Test</description>
<pubDate>25 May  2009 05:00:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222251</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Need new release 1.4.5 of GenericSetup</title>
<description>Previously Vincent Fretin wrote: &amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I patched two things in GenericSetup branch 1.4 (merged on trunk as &amp;gt; well), both items have a test. &amp;gt; If</description>
<pubDate>25 May  2009 04:09:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222248</link>
</item><item>
<title>Need new release 1.4.5 of GenericSetup</title>
<description>Hi, I patched two things in GenericSetup branch 1.4 (merged on trunk as well), both items have a test. If possible, can you please release a new vers</description>
<pubDate>25 May  2009 04:08:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/zope/cmf/222247</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
