
alk at ondore
Apr 3, 2012, 3:50 PM
Post #8 of 9
(519 views)
Permalink
|
El 03/04/12 17:34, Fajar A. Nugraha escribió: > On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 4:52 AM, Alexandre Kouznetsov<alk [at] ondore> wrote: >> I don't use network-bridge script, my Debian's /etc/network/interfaces looks >> like this (note that Dom0 has no IP on that interface in my setup): >> iface xenbr22 inet manual >> bridge_ports eth1.22 >> bridge_stp off >> bridge_fd 5 > > Any particular reason to use "5"? Why not "0", or "1"? Just the personal policy to stay as much close to the defaults as possible. I assume that FD is not set to something so small for some reason, which I wish not to have to find under pressure of something not working. I found 5 was small enough. (: >> Probably, I will end up writing some wrapper to be used with >> "bootloader" option. I would talks to TFTP, get specified pxelinux config >> file, parse it, download the kernel and inirtd, than start up the VM. >> Although, it has not been written yet. > > Isn't that what pypxeboot does? http://grid.ie/pypxeboot/ The words "modified version", "patch", and "build" scares me. But basically, yes, pypxeboot should work. Did not think about building a .deb of it instead of custom script. -- Alexandre Kouznetsov _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users [at] lists http://lists.xen.org/xen-users
|