Mailing List Archive: Wikipedia: Wikitech

Re: Improvements for Commons; was FlaggedRevs en.wp deployment update

Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded

chrisipk at gmail

Oct 16, 2009, 5:43 AM

Post #1 of 10 (1027 views)
Permalink

Re: Improvements for Commons; was FlaggedRevs en.wp deployment update

Erik Moeller wrote:
> We met Howie during our search for the Multimedia Usability Product
> Manager position, and were impressed by his background, particularly
> with regard to user focused product development, and some great first
> thoughts he sent us on how to improve the usability of Wikimedia
> Commons.

So right now, they are only hired to roll out flagged revs on en.wp. I think
that improvements to Commons are at least as vital as en.wp problems, seeing
that Commons is a mess in many places right now. Are there any plans to hire
him for a Commons makeover? What exactly did he propose we improve? Have those
improvements been published and discussed?

Regards,

ChrisiPK

Attachments:

signature.asc (0.25 KB)

gerard.meijssen at gmail

Oct 16, 2009, 6:00 AM

Post #2 of 10 (973 views)
Permalink

Re: Improvements for Commons; was FlaggedRevs en.wp deployment update [In reply to]

Hoi,
There is a meeting of "Commons" people in Paris in November.. so Commons is
not forgotten. The issue is that it makes sense to finnish things. One of my
biggest frustrations is how long things take. It is for this reason that I
am so pleased with the Usability Initiative because it regularly produces
results. It is not an unending wait for whatever reason.

There is considerable stress to get Flagged Revisions rolled out. Let us get
it over and done with so that we can move to other things.. for instance
improvements to Commons..

FYI I have an interest in improving several things for Commons. Some things
are waiting for adoption for over a year and I am not done waiting.
Thanks,
GerardM

2009/10/16 ChrisiPK <chrisipk [at] gmail>

> Erik Moeller wrote:
> > We met Howie during our search for the Multimedia Usability Product
> > Manager position, and were impressed by his background, particularly
> > with regard to user focused product development, and some great first
> > thoughts he sent us on how to improve the usability of Wikimedia
> > Commons.
>
> So right now, they are only hired to roll out flagged revs on en.wp. I
> think
> that improvements to Commons are at least as vital as en.wp problems,
> seeing
> that Commons is a mess in many places right now. Are there any plans to
> hire
> him for a Commons makeover? What exactly did he propose we improve? Have
> those
> improvements been published and discussed?
>
> Regards,
>
> ChrisiPK
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikitech-l mailing list
> Wikitech-l [at] lists
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
>
_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l [at] lists
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Simetrical+wikilist at gmail

Oct 16, 2009, 6:31 AM

Post #3 of 10 (974 views)
Permalink

Re: Improvements for Commons; was FlaggedRevs en.wp deployment update [In reply to]

On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 8:43 AM, ChrisiPK <chrisipk [at] gmail> wrote:
> So right now, they are only hired to roll out flagged revs on en.wp. I think
> that improvements to Commons are at least as vital as en.wp problems, seeing
> that Commons is a mess in many places right now.

I don't know any more about the decision than you do, but I would
point out that a) FlaggedRevs is all coded and ready for deployment,
unlike most Commons features that are desired; and b) Wikimedia has
made a quite public commitment to deploy FlaggedRevs soon, unlike any
Commons features. It's not like Commons has been ignored, anyway --
the new-upload branch should greatly benefit Commons, from what I've
heard. It's just apparently not ready for deployment yet.

I'm not trying to discourage anyone for poking people about
improvements to Commons here, of course. I'm sure more work should be
put into Commons. But at this precise moment, prioritizing this one
specific enwiki feature seems to make sense.

_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l [at] lists
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

chrisipk at gmail

Oct 16, 2009, 8:26 AM

Post #4 of 10 (978 views)
Permalink

Re: Improvements for Commons; was FlaggedRevs en.wp deployment update [In reply to]

Gerard Meijssen wrote:
> There is considerable stress to get Flagged Revisions rolled out. Let us get
> it over and done with so that we can move to other things.. for instance
> improvements to Commons..

I was not arguing that we delay Flagged Revs for Commons' sake, I was only
interested whether Commons would also get some hired councilors (or whatever
they are). Sorry if that was how my post read. I'm surprised anyway that it
takes two employees to deploy a feature which other projects have implemented
with community consensus only and without official support, but that's not at
issue here.

Gerard Meijssen wrote:
> FYI I have an interest in improving several things for Commons. Some things
> are waiting for adoption for over a year and I am not done waiting.

So do I and I think we need to make some sort of summary what we actually want
to do. I have tried this by creating a proposal on the strategy wiki[1], but
there has not been an awful lot of input over there. If you know a better
place where such discussion should take place, please let me know.
Also some sort of watchlist would be nice where suggested improvemets are
listed, among with improvements awaiting implementation and so on.

Thanks and regards,

ChrisiPK

Attachments:

signature.asc (0.25 KB)

Platonides at gmail

Oct 16, 2009, 9:58 AM

Post #5 of 10 (971 views)
Permalink

Re: Improvements for Commons; was FlaggedRevs en.wp deployment update [In reply to]

ChrisiPK wrote:
> Gerard Meijssen wrote:
>> FYI I have an interest in improving several things for Commons. Some things
>> are waiting for adoption for over a year and I am not done waiting.
>
> So do I and I think we need to make some sort of summary what we actually want
> to do. I have tried this by creating a proposal on the strategy wiki[1], but
> there has not been an awful lot of input over there. If you know a better
> place where such discussion should take place, please let me know.
> Also some sort of watchlist would be nice where suggested improvemets are
> listed, among with improvements awaiting implementation and so on.
>
> Thanks and regards,
>
> ChrisiPK

There is http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Bugs listing a good
number of things that we want.
If Howie is going to work "improving commons" I hope him to cut down
that list, instead of working on a new feature that he thought might be
neat.
I'm not trying to discourage new ideas, they wouldprobably be good. But
I see that the Foundation POV of the issues needing tech attention is
often different than the one seen from the community, since the work for
many hires surprise me. For example, I don't think that working on
LiquidThreads would have been pointed as a priority by many members (the
current system is "not too broken").
Strategy intends to learn which things are important, but just having a
developer coming to the Village Pump to implement whatever the local
community needs [and is reasonable] could make a difference. It wouldn't
be appropiate for Big Changes, but would give an easy say for many small
changes that may simply annoy them. Making volunteers happy is
important, too.

_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l [at] lists
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

erik at wikimedia

Oct 16, 2009, 10:15 AM

Post #6 of 10 (981 views)
Permalink

Re: Improvements for Commons; was FlaggedRevs en.wp deployment update [In reply to]

2009/10/16 ChrisiPK <chrisipk [at] gmail>:
> So right now, they are only hired to roll out flagged revs on en.wp. I think
> that improvements to Commons are at least as vital as en.wp problems, seeing
> that Commons is a mess in many places right now. Are there any plans to hire
> him for a Commons makeover?

As per

http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Press_releases/Wikimedia_Ford_Foundation_Grant_July_2009

we have a $300,000 project underway to improve the usability of
Wikimedia Commons. We've just about wrapped up the hiring process for
it, and will make an announcement soon. Please note that Howie and
William are contractors, not full-time employees; they're supporting
FlaggedRevs on a part-time basis, and Howie will also provide some
support to the Commons project.
--
Erik M�ller
Deputy Director, Wikimedia Foundation

Support Free Knowledge: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate

_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l [at] lists
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

erik at wikimedia

Oct 16, 2009, 10:22 AM

Post #7 of 10 (968 views)
Permalink

Re: Improvements for Commons; was FlaggedRevs en.wp deployment update [In reply to]

2009/10/16 Platonides <Platonides [at] gmail>:
> Strategy intends to learn which things are important, but just having a
> developer coming to the Village Pump to implement whatever the local
> community needs [and is reasonable] could make a difference.

I agree that we need a healthy mix of project-based work (where we
identify priorities together, but WMF ultimately needs to make a call
of where it wants to focus its resources) and reactive work that is
about fixing or assigning small bugs, integrating existing
community-built extensions or making toolserver hacks into core
functionality, reviewing code, etc. This is why in addition to larger
scale project-based work and project contracts, we also are growing
our core team. The recently posted Code Maintenance Engineer position
falls into the core team category:

http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Job_openings/Code_Maintenance_Engineer

We have additional positions budgeted later in the year, and if the
fundraiser performs according to plan, we'll continue to expand both
project and core capacity. I think even if WMF were 10 times as large
as it is, though, we'd still have many of the same conversations about
"why this thing and not the other thing" all the time - probably more,
because there'd be more resources to compete for. :-)
--
Erik M�ller
Deputy Director, Wikimedia Foundation

Support Free Knowledge: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Donate

_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l [at] lists
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

mdale at wikimedia

Oct 16, 2009, 11:11 AM

Post #8 of 10 (973 views)
Permalink

Re: Improvements for Commons; was FlaggedRevs en.wp deployment update [In reply to]

Aryeh Gregor wrote:
> [snip]
> It's not like Commons has been ignored, anyway --
> the new-upload branch should greatly benefit Commons, from what I've
> heard. It's just apparently not ready for deployment yet.
>
... here is a quick update...

New upload branch has been deployed for a few weeks now. You can take
advantage of some of its feature set with the mwEmbed gadgets:
http://techblog.wikimedia.org/2009/10/new-media-features-gadget/

I hope to transition those gadgets to be 'enabled by default' or
'opt-in' as part of the usability efforts. Not sure how that will work yet.

The next big things coming up:

a) enabling copy-by-url uploads on commons then in-line insert from
remote repositories and in-line uploading can be exposed as seen on
http://prototype.wikimedia.org/sandbox.2/Main_Page

b) getting a api-iframe-proxy in-place so you can do those in-line
uploads and remote inserts into commons from any edit page on
*.wikipedia or arbitrary approved remote domains.

Also aim to polish up the ogg derivatives extension 'wikiAtHome'. Also
in the nearish future I should be working on sequencer support,
multi-lingual timed text for video subtitles / annotations, SVG
parametrization, and finishing up the javascript language packaging
system support for template parameters ( early version here:
http://prototype.wikimedia.org/s-2/js2/mwEmbed/tests/testLang.html (only
English showed but some progress has been made on a general cldr
interpreter)

More general overview of media projects efforts is available here:
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Media_Projects_Overview

peace,
michael

_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l [at] lists
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

rarohde at gmail

Oct 16, 2009, 11:54 AM

Post #9 of 10 (974 views)
Permalink

Re: Improvements for Commons; was FlaggedRevs en.wp deployment update [In reply to]

On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Platonides <Platonides [at] gmail> wrote:
> ChrisiPK wrote:
>> Gerard Meijssen wrote:
>>> FYI I have an interest in improving several things for Commons. Some things
>>> are waiting for adoption for over a year and I am not done waiting.
>>
>> So do I and I think we need to make some sort of summary what we actually want
>> to do. I have tried this by creating a proposal on the strategy wiki[1], but
>> there has not been an awful lot of input over there. If you know a better
>> place where such discussion should take place, please let me know.
>> Also some sort of watchlist would be nice where suggested improvemets are
>> listed, among with improvements awaiting implementation and so on.
>>
>> Thanks and regards,
>>
>> ChrisiPK
>
> There is http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Bugs listing a good
> number of things that we want.
> If Howie is going to work "improving commons" I hope him to cut down
> that list, instead of working on a new feature that he thought might be
> neat.
> I'm not trying to discourage new ideas, they wouldprobably be good. But
> I see that the Foundation POV of the issues needing tech attention is
> often different than the one seen from the community, since the work for
> many hires surprise me. For example, I don't think that working on
> LiquidThreads would have been pointed as a priority by many members (the
> current system is "not too broken").
> Strategy intends to learn which things are important, but just having a
> developer coming to the Village Pump to implement whatever the local
> community needs [and is reasonable] could make a difference. It wouldn't
> be appropiate for Big Changes, but would give an easy say for many small
> changes that may simply annoy them. Making volunteers happy is
> important, too.

Rather than having developers visit village pumps on various projects,
it would be good for a standard and well-advertised technical forum to
be set up somewhere (mediawiki.org, meta) to discuss feature requests
from the community and help communicate community desires and
priorities to the developer community. Bugzilla sort of serves that
purpose now, but I know that many people are intimidated by that
format and it isn't well suited for general consensus gauging
discussions.

-Robert Rohde

_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l [at] lists
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Platonides at gmail

Oct 16, 2009, 2:24 PM

Post #10 of 10 (986 views)
Permalink

Re: Improvements for Commons; was FlaggedRevs en.wp deployment update [In reply to]

Robert Rohde wrote:
> Rather than having developers visit village pumps on various projects,
> it would be good for a standard and well-advertised technical forum to
> be set up somewhere (mediawiki.org, meta) to discuss feature requests
> from the community and help communicate community desires and
> priorities to the developer community. Bugzilla sort of serves that
> purpose now, but I know that many people are intimidated by that
> format and it isn't well suited for general consensus gauging
> discussions.
>
> -Robert Rohde

Having the developer come to your Village Pump instead of going to The
Site* where the powerful devs live, makes him closer.

*Please, don't make yet another wiki for that.

_______________________________________________
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l [at] lists
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded

Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads