
lamiaposta71 at gmail
Nov 12, 2009, 2:25 PM
Post #3 of 3
(566 views)
Permalink
|
2009/11/12 Platonides <Platonides [at] gmail>: > Raffaele Recalcati wrote: >> Reading "The Art of Unix programming" I was thinking to use a >> professional way to do versioning inside mediawiki. >> Why not to use git inside? >> Another my pb is working offline, writing readme guide of my linux >> embedded setup. >> I'd like to write it on my pc and than do git push to send to mediawiki server. >> But git is good to do it, because I can manage merges. >> It is possible to do it? >> How much work can be estimated? > > git tracks the repository. MediaWiki works on articles. > Also note, git is younger than MediaWiki :-) git can work on mediawiki text, beacause is a plain text format. mmm, maybe I'm forgetting asian utf8 or unicode encodings... > > Yes, working offline is a problem. There have been talks from offline > section for fixing it on the longterm. > The solution for working offline by some people is to carry a mediawiki > on a usb stick. mediawiki on usb stick is very nice to see your mediawiki document rendered inside a browser. but when I copy and paste it to the original server it can be a problem to manage the merges of others modifications. It could be nice to extend the history diff tool to a mediawiki text that is present on the hard disk. the diff tool could work as meld, letting me choose which modification I want to pick from the mediawiki text present on the hard disk. so: work offline on usb mediawiki go online open diff-meld-like tool choose what to get save beautiful!! > > > _______________________________________________ > MediaWiki-l mailing list > MediaWiki-l [at] lists > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l > -- www.opensurf.it _______________________________________________ MediaWiki-l mailing list MediaWiki-l [at] lists https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-l
|