jayen466 at gmail
Aug 19, 2012, 3:04 AM
Post #3 of 5
I currently see 370 submissions pending. Does this mean that someone has
Re: [Wikimedia-l] Articles for Creation broken
[In reply to]
processed 700 articles since the beginning of this thread, or am I looking
at the wrong thing?
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Steven Zhang <cro0016 [at] gmail> wrote:
> So, I had a look at articles for creation today, and there was nearly
> 1,000 pending article submissions. Articles for creation has changed a lot
> since 2008 - it was of a similar structure to XFD - all submissions for a
> particular day were on one page, and people could come along and approve or
> reject based in certain criteria.
> I think that system worked well. True, we have a lot more article
> creations, but I think it gave more visibility than the current system
> where everything is subpaged.
> Some may think that the bar at AFC is set too high but this high bar
> discourages new users, especially when their submissions stay unreviewed
> for weeks at a time. And since editor retention is something we are trying
> to focus on, it seems a worthy project since many new users have their
> first experiences in AFC. The lack of volunteers in wikiprojects like AFC
> is not a new thing, so it's not that volunteers have reduced. I think we
> need to consider if AFC is something we still want to have, and if so, how
> can we improve it?
> Steve Zhang
> Wikimedia-l mailing list
> Wikimedia-l [at] lists
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimedia-l
Wikimedia-l mailing list
Wikimedia-l [at] lists