Login | Register For Free | Help
Search for: (Advanced)

Mailing List Archive: Wikipedia: Foundation
Re: Controversial content software status 		 

Index | Next | Previous | View Flat


morton.thomas at googlemail

Mar 7, 2012, 3:29 PM


Views: 1058
Permalink
Re: Controversial content software status [In reply to]
On 7 Mar 2012, at 23:16, David Gerard <dgerard [at] gmail> wrote:

> On 7 March 2012 23:08, Thomas Morton <morton.thomas [at] googlemail> wrote:
>> On 7 Mar 2012, at 23:03, David Gerard <dgerard [at] gmail> wrote:
>
>>> I think you have no grasp of just how far beyond merely "mainstream"
>>> Wikipedia is.
>
>> The answer being; Not much at all.
>
>
> We're beyond mainstream and are now infrastructure. We're part of the
> assumed background. Academia and museums come to us now. While I'm
> sure someone can then say "and therefore we must filter", that's
> asserting the claim for the *opposite* reason Andreas gives, i.e.
> insufficient fame.

We're a mainstream resource, with links to academia. Whilst it is
tempting to view the movement as radical and fundamental we are
majority ruled, and the majority is mainstream.

We are progressive, but that is another matter.

All of which is irrelevant in considering the desire of the reader.

Which has been my consistent criticism of this debacle.

Tom

_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l [at] lists
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

Subject User Time
Controversial content software status z at mzmcbride Mar 1, 2012, 8:49 PM
    Re: Controversial content software status jayen466 at gmail Mar 3, 2012, 8:44 PM
    Re: Controversial content software status keegan.wiki at gmail Mar 3, 2012, 8:50 PM
    Re: Controversial content software status z at mzmcbride Mar 4, 2012, 3:10 PM
    Re: Controversial content software status phoebe.wiki at gmail Mar 4, 2012, 5:00 PM
    Re: Controversial content software status z at mzmcbride Mar 4, 2012, 7:04 PM
    Re: Controversial content software status jayen466 at gmail Mar 4, 2012, 9:03 PM
    Re: Controversial content software status dgerard at gmail Mar 4, 2012, 11:32 PM
    Re: Controversial content software status jayen466 at gmail Mar 5, 2012, 12:07 AM
    Re: Controversial content software status phoebe.wiki at gmail Mar 5, 2012, 9:07 AM
    Re: Controversial content software status cimonavaro at gmail Mar 5, 2012, 9:49 AM
    Re: Controversial content software status jayen466 at gmail Mar 5, 2012, 10:21 AM
    Re: Controversial content software status dgerard at gmail Mar 5, 2012, 11:50 AM
    Re: Controversial content software status tobias.oelgarte at googlemail Mar 5, 2012, 4:33 PM
        Re: Controversial content software status jayen466 at gmail Mar 5, 2012, 9:25 PM
    Re: Controversial content software status dgerard at gmail Mar 5, 2012, 4:41 PM
    Re: Controversial content software status phoebe.wiki at gmail Mar 5, 2012, 4:57 PM
    Re: Controversial content software status jayvdb at gmail Mar 5, 2012, 4:58 PM
    Re: Controversial content software status z at mzmcbride Mar 5, 2012, 5:01 PM
    Re: Controversial content software status dgerard at gmail Mar 5, 2012, 5:06 PM
    Re: Controversial content software status nawrich at gmail Mar 5, 2012, 5:20 PM
    Re: Controversial content software status jayvdb at gmail Mar 5, 2012, 5:29 PM
    Re: Controversial content software status phoebe.wiki at gmail Mar 5, 2012, 5:32 PM
    Re: Controversial content software status jayen466 at gmail Mar 5, 2012, 9:14 PM
    Re: Controversial content software status cimonavaro at gmail Mar 5, 2012, 11:06 PM
    Re: Controversial content software status cimonavaro at gmail Mar 5, 2012, 11:23 PM
    Re: Controversial content software status putevod at mccme Mar 6, 2012, 8:20 AM
    Re: Controversial content software status kat at mindspillage Mar 6, 2012, 6:30 PM
    Re: Controversial content software status phoebe.wiki at gmail Mar 7, 2012, 8:05 AM
    Re: Controversial content software status werespielchequers at gmail Mar 7, 2012, 8:40 AM
    Re: Controversial content software status julianadacostajose at googlemail Mar 7, 2012, 9:02 AM
    Re: Controversial content software status phoebe.wiki at gmail Mar 7, 2012, 9:27 AM
    Re: Controversial content software status julianadacostajose at googlemail Mar 7, 2012, 9:52 AM
    Re: Controversial content software status dgerard at gmail Mar 7, 2012, 10:13 AM
    Re: Controversial content software status michaeldavid86 at comcast Mar 7, 2012, 10:29 AM
        Re: Controversial content software status andreengels at gmail Mar 8, 2012, 5:26 AM
    Re: Controversial content software status delirium at hackish Mar 7, 2012, 1:00 PM
    Re: Controversial content software status jayen466 at gmail Mar 7, 2012, 2:41 PM
    Re: Controversial content software status dgerard at gmail Mar 7, 2012, 3:03 PM
    Re: Controversial content software status morton.thomas at googlemail Mar 7, 2012, 3:08 PM
        Re: Controversial content software status dgerard at gmail Mar 7, 2012, 3:15 PM
    Re: Controversial content software status morton.thomas at googlemail Mar 7, 2012, 3:29 PM
        Re: Controversial content software status saintonge at telus Mar 8, 2012, 3:01 AM
            Re: Controversial content software status morton.thomas at googlemail Mar 8, 2012, 3:23 AM
    Re: Controversial content software status tobias.oelgarte at googlemail Mar 7, 2012, 3:46 PM
        Re: Controversial content software status jayen466 at gmail Mar 7, 2012, 4:53 PM
    Re: Controversial content software status cimonavaro at gmail Mar 7, 2012, 4:56 PM
    Re: Controversial content software status tobias.oelgarte at googlemail Mar 7, 2012, 5:20 PM
    Re: Controversial content software status julianadacostajose at googlemail Mar 7, 2012, 6:42 PM
    Re: Controversial content software status jayen466 at gmail Mar 7, 2012, 9:24 PM
    Re: Controversial content software status z at mzmcbride Mar 7, 2012, 9:40 PM
        Re: Controversial content software status z at mzmcbride Mar 7, 2012, 9:45 PM
        Re: Controversial content software status putevod at mccme Mar 7, 2012, 11:37 PM
    Re: Controversial content software status morton.thomas at googlemail Mar 7, 2012, 11:13 PM
    Re: Controversial content software status cimonavaro at gmail Mar 7, 2012, 11:13 PM
    Re: Controversial content software status dgerard at gmail Mar 7, 2012, 11:40 PM
    Re: Controversial content software status de10011 at gmail Mar 8, 2012, 2:20 AM
    Re: Controversial content software status nawrich at gmail Mar 8, 2012, 6:44 AM
    Re: Controversial content software status cimonavaro at gmail Mar 8, 2012, 8:18 PM
    Re: Controversial content software status nawrich at gmail Mar 9, 2012, 5:52 AM
    Re: Controversial content software status dgerard at gmail Mar 9, 2012, 6:31 AM
    Re: Controversial content software status nawrich at gmail Mar 9, 2012, 7:11 AM
    Re: Controversial content software status coldchrist at gmail Mar 9, 2012, 7:15 AM
    Re: Controversial content software status jayen466 at gmail Mar 9, 2012, 9:48 AM
    Re: Controversial content software status saintonge at telus Mar 9, 2012, 5:50 PM
    Re: Controversial content software status saintonge at telus Mar 9, 2012, 6:16 PM
        Re: Controversial content software status jayen466 at gmail Mar 9, 2012, 9:39 PM
    Re: Controversial content software status saintonge at telus Mar 13, 2012, 12:23 AM
        Re: Controversial content software status gerard.meijssen at gmail Mar 14, 2012, 3:34 PM

  Index | Next | Previous | View Flat
 
 


Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads
 
  Web Applications & Managed Hosting Powered by Gossamer Threads Inc.