effeietsanders at gmail
Jun 16, 2009, 1:21 AM
Post #4 of 4
(574 views)
Permalink
|
|
Re: Some reflections about the governance of Commons
[In reply to]
|
|
The interface is only part of the problems which were identified. Also the
complicated procedures and the (sometimes considered hostile - although not
even always intentional) community were part of the equation. However, I do
agree that the interface is a huge problem, and fixing that would probably
make the odds to encounter a hostile community member smaller etc.
Lodewijk
2009/6/15 Michael Peel <email [at] mikepeel>
> That is more to do with the interface to Commons, as I understand it,
> rather than the governance of it. Flickr is seen as being much easier
> to use. I believe that was also the origin of Pikiwiki - essentially
> creating a better interface to Commons.
>
> BTW, to date I've never had a problem with Commons (after >2000 edits
> and >500 images uploaded).
>
> Mike
>
> On 15 Jun 2009, at 17:58, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
>
> > Hoi,
> > There is a project called "Wiki loves art/nl" In this project
> > people make
> > pictures of objects in museums in the Netherlands. The thing I have
> > been
> > wondering about is that the pictures are first published on Flickr
> > and then
> > are copied into Commons.
> >
> > This is a project of the Dutch WMF chapter and some other
> > organisations. I
> > read it as "there are too many problems with posting on Commons
> > directly".
> > The reason why I bring this up is because it demonstrates how
> > Commons is not
> > thought of as the helpful project it should be and it is not only
> > pikiwiki
> > that has a problem.
> > Thanks,
> > GerardM
> >
> > 2009/6/12 Ting Chen <wing.philopp [at] gmx>
> >
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I had started a discussion on the Village Pump of Commons. I think
> >> Commons is a very important project, and a very complicated project.
> >> With more and more projects initiated by our chapters to encourage
> >> other
> >> organizations or individuals to give their content free and upload
> >> them
> >> to Commons it also becomes a fassade project of the Foundation and
> >> its
> >> chapters. This and other reasons make me think that we should as
> >> broadly
> >> as possible to discuss a few issues on Commons. The discussion is
> >> here:
> >>
> >>
> >> http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/
> >> Commons:Village_pump#Some_reflections_about_the_governance_of_Common
> >>
> >> --
> >> Ting
> >>
> >> Ting's Blog: http://wingphilopp.blogspot.com/
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> foundation-l mailing list
> >> foundation-l [at] lists
> >> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/
> >> foundation-l
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > foundation-l mailing list
> > foundation-l [at] lists
> > Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> foundation-l mailing list
> foundation-l [at] lists
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
>
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l [at] lists
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
|
