birgitte_sb at yahoo
May 15, 2009, 11:40 AM
Post #2 of 4
(396 views)
Permalink
|
|
Re: Wikipedia is not the Kama Sutra, was Re: commons and freely licensed sexual imagery
[In reply to]
|
|
--- On Fri, 5/15/09, Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+wikilist[at]gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+wikilist[at]gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Wikipedia is not the Kama Sutra, was Re: commons and freely licensed sexual imagery
> To: "Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List" <foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org>
> Date: Friday, May 15, 2009, 1:26 PM
> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 9:33 AM,
> Birgitte SB <birgitte_sb[at]yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> > Your really didn't address my question. Why do you
> think WMF resources are best used to create and support a
> mirror for people who are disgusted by sexuality rather than
> making easier for third-parties to create mirrors for *any*
> of different of audiences in the world that find various
> different things unacceptable?
>
> I don't, and I'm not sure why you think I do. I
> explicitly stated
> that I favored a categorization system whereby users can
> filter out
> whatever content they personally find objectionable, and
> display
> whatever they don't. I also never said WMF resources
> should be spent
> on anything, and I definitely don't support creating entire
> mirrors
> just for the sake of image content when you could just hide
> or display
> the images inline. So I'm not sure what you mean at
> all.
Well you now snipped it all, but someone suggested creating mirror under a different domain name for schools. I replied to that saying how I thought resources were best spent. Then you replied to me.
If you weren't replying to me to disagree with me, I have no idea what you intended. But I thought disagreement with me was a pretty safe assumption from the tone of your message.
Birgitte SB
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l[at]lists.wikimedia.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
|
