
dmcdevit at cox
Nov 10, 2008, 2:59 PM
Post #10 of 11
(3975 views)
Permalink
|
|
Re: Thai government blocks English wikipedia page about the king
[In reply to]
|
|
Ian A. Holton wrote: > Can anybody confirm this? > > Ian > > On 11/10/08, Waerth <waerth [at] asianet> wrote: > >> It seems that the Thai government has decided to block wikipedia's page >> in English about the King .... . If going there by interwiki link from >> the Dutch wikipedia I end up here: http://w3.mict.go.th/ >> >> W I did some research to see if anyone else is reporting this, and it seems that others are experiencing the same problem, but it has not yet made the news (in reference to Wikipedia's block explicitly).The Freedom Against Censorship Thailand blog reports that it has been blocked since at least October 1, and though I can't read the Thai sites they cite, it seems pretty well independently verified. <http://facthai.wordpress.com/2008/10/22/wikipedia-blocked-by-some-thai-isps-fact-exclusive/> Thailand enforces a lese majeste law, which means people may be prosecuted for "insulting" the king (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L%C3%A8se_majest%C3%A9#Thailand). As a result, Thailand has a rather active internet censorship program that has become more active during the recent political crisis <http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7696101.stm>. (Incidentally, the author of that article, BBC's Thailand correspondent, was himself under investigation earlier this year, accused of insulting the king: <http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2008/04/08/asia/AS-GEN-Thailand-BBC.php>.) It seems that several media agencies, like BBC, reported the recent surge in censorship, but none of them mention Wikipedia explicitly, while it is likely that it was one of the sites targeted in the October crackdown. Incidentally, last year's brief blocking of YouTube by Thailand (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Media_of_Thailand#YouTube_controversy) led to much greater international media scrutiny, and it seems likely that if it continues, Wikipedia's block may yet be newsworthy, especially since unlike the inflammatory YouTube videos, the Wikipedia article seems relatively neutral. Dominic _______________________________________________ foundation-l mailing list foundation-l [at] lists Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l
|