Mailing List Archive: Wikipedia: Foundation

Google knol launches with CC BY default

Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded

shizhao at gmail

Jul 23, 2008, 8:09 PM

Post #1 of 6 (528 views)
Permalink

Google knol launches with CC BY default

Google Knol is live. It launches with CC BY default.

Mike Linksvayer say, s prior to its launch Knol was often speculatively
compared to Wikipedia, it should be noted that the default Knol license (CC
BY) could permit using Knol content in Wikipedia (with attribution of
course), but knols under more restrictive options could not be incorporated
into Wikipedia. On the other hand Wikipedia content could not be
incorporated into knols (except in the case of fair use of course), even in
the case Wikipedia migrates to CC
BY-SA<http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/8213>ā€” Knol doesn't
offer a copyleft license.

see
http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/8506
http://blogoscoped.com/archive/2008-07-23-n20.html

--
Chinese wikipedia: http://zh.wikipedia.org/
My blog: http://talk.blogbus.com

[[zh:User:Shizhao]]
_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l [at] lists
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

wikimail at inbox

Jul 23, 2008, 10:12 PM

Post #2 of 6 (519 views)
Permalink

Re: Google knol launches with CC BY default [In reply to]

On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 11:09 PM, shi zhao <shizhao [at] gmail> wrote:
> Google Knol is live. It launches with CC BY default.
>
> Mike Linksvayer say, s prior to its launch Knol was often speculatively
> compared to Wikipedia, it should be noted that the default Knol license (CC
> BY) could permit using Knol content in Wikipedia (with attribution of
> course), but knols under more restrictive options could not be incorporated
> into Wikipedia.

Why can't you just pick "all rights reserved" and then add a GFDL
license notice? The phrase "all rights reserved" doesn't preclude
releasing a work under a license. In fact, nowadays the phrase is
pretty much legally meaningless.

_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l [at] lists
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

sean at silentflame

Jul 25, 2008, 10:44 AM

Post #3 of 6 (488 views)
Permalink

Re: Google knol launches with CC BY default [In reply to]

On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 04:09, shi zhao <shizhao [at] gmail> wrote:
> Google Knol is live. It launches with CC BY default.
>
> Mike Linksvayer say, s prior to its launch Knol was often speculatively
> compared to Wikipedia, it should be noted that the default Knol license (CC
> BY) could permit using Knol content in Wikipedia (with attribution of
> course), but knols under more restrictive options could not be incorporated
> into Wikipedia. On the other hand Wikipedia content could not be
> incorporated into knols (except in the case of fair use of course), even in
> the case Wikipedia migrates to CC
> BY-SA<http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/8213>— Knol doesn't
> offer a copyleft license.
>
> see
> http://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/8506
> http://blogoscoped.com/archive/2008-07-23-n20.html

It's been pointed out on another list that there is a clause somewhere
that says you give Google a load of rights allowing them to relicense
your content as they please. So it's not quite as free and open as we
might like.

--
Regards,
Sean Whitton <sean [at] silentflame>
http://seanwhitton.com/
GPG: 0x25F4EAB7

_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l [at] lists
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

thomas.dalton at gmail

Jul 25, 2008, 11:01 AM

Post #4 of 6 (491 views)
Permalink

Re: Google knol launches with CC BY default [In reply to]

> It's been pointed out on another list that there is a clause somewhere
> that says you give Google a load of rights allowing them to relicense
> your content as they please. So it's not quite as free and open as we
> might like.

That sounds like an additional freedom (to Google), rather than a
restriction. Just because Google can license it under something else
doesn't mean we can't continue to use it under the original license.

_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l [at] lists
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

wikipedia at verizon

Jul 25, 2008, 11:17 AM

Post #5 of 6 (491 views)
Permalink

Re: Google knol launches with CC BY default [In reply to]

Thomas Dalton wrote:
>> It's been pointed out on another list that there is a clause somewhere
>> that says you give Google a load of rights allowing them to relicense
>> your content as they please. So it's not quite as free and open as we
>> might like.
>>
> That sounds like an additional freedom (to Google), rather than a
> restriction. Just because Google can license it under something else
> doesn't mean we can't continue to use it under the original license.
>
Technically it's not a restriction, right, rather it's a caution about
being aware of what kinds of control you surrender when entering into
such an arrangement.

--Michael Snow

_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l [at] lists
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

wikimail at inbox

Jul 25, 2008, 11:26 AM

Post #6 of 6 (484 views)
Permalink

Re: Google knol launches with CC BY default [In reply to]

On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 2:17 PM, Michael Snow <wikipedia [at] verizon> wrote:
> Thomas Dalton wrote:
>>> It's been pointed out on another list that there is a clause somewhere
>>> that says you give Google a load of rights allowing them to relicense
>>> your content as they please. So it's not quite as free and open as we
>>> might like.
>>>
>> That sounds like an additional freedom (to Google), rather than a
>> restriction. Just because Google can license it under something else
>> doesn't mean we can't continue to use it under the original license.
>>
> Technically it's not a restriction, right, rather it's a caution about
> being aware of what kinds of control you surrender when entering into
> such an arrangement.
>
No more than the rights you surrender when licensing your work under
CC-BY (especially in states where attribution is a right that can't be
surrendered).

_______________________________________________
foundation-l mailing list
foundation-l [at] lists
Unsubscribe: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/foundation-l

Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded

Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads